So prices are rising across the board, not disproportionately targetting value ranges, but obviously this will affect the poorest people most.
Why is Jack arguing about this? Her point that the poorest suffer most still stands? Just not that they are being systematically starved on purpose while Charlie Bigham rubs his hands in glee.
Two months ago when she first started this
people like Dresserman and Chris Giles were calming pointing this out but she was off on her pompous high horse by then.