just saw this tweet and, while I have no idea what it means, it fits with our interests
Gammonuendo?!just saw this tweet and, while I have no idea what it means, it fits with our interests
View attachment 794739
Ely Radio? Without wanting to offend any Ely Fraus, that's a bit niche innit.I’m confused by this tweet, not investigated it, but it looks like Jack might have been on the radio again?!
View attachment 794760
oooohhhhhhh! that makes sense! I prefer an explicable egg, see, that's why I didn't get itGammonuendo?!
Maybe it was Jack Monroe, 76, from the allotments with his massive pumpkin.Ely Radio? Without wanting to offend any Ely Fraus, that's a bit niche innit.
A lightly fried egg, under easy?oooohhhhhhh! that makes sense! I prefer an explicable egg, see, that's why I didn't get it
eta for other stumped fraus, imagine you're at a Bernie Inn with 1970s jack and guessing what she'd have with her gammon steak
FTFYMaybe it was Jack Monroe, 76, from the allotments with his massivepumpkin.Kumquat!
Evening Jack, having a late night grunk? Couldn't resist showing off your handwriting after the cabal complimented it?
sorry, what bollocking? And given that Insta was out yesterday evening… she waited until it was back to post that?Evening Jack, having a late night grunk? Couldn't resist showing off your handwriting after the cabal complimented it?
Shameless
It isn’t 22 pages if you leave a line.
Is sentient mirror not her friend?
Same old waffling on with no solutions. I get that's generally the way with politics, but at least put in a bit of effort.
This ! I don’t understand why it’s always her they call on. I can only think it’s laziness because why repeatedly go back to someone who had an unknown “level” of poverty (she can’t keep to the same lie) many, many years ago when so many people are living and breathing this right now?Oh wow, wonder why they bothered inviting Jack if they had the real deal from the TT? Wouldn’t it make more sense to have brought someone service user facing along with her who could discuss the complex challenges their SUs have in the year 2021, rather than Jack’s tired old tit? How much would a bus or cab across Manchester cost versus Jack’s mammoth expense account…
There are numerous studies (some pretty hefty longitudinal ones to boot ) that have found the impact of poverty on later negative outcomes.This ! I don’t understand why it’s always her they call on. I can only think it’s laziness because why repeatedly go back to someone who had an unknown “level” of poverty (she can’t keep to the same lie) many, many years ago when so many people are living and breathing this right now?
I can only think it’s because they know she’s a puppet who will toe the party line. If they wanted to make a difference, the Tories could find their voters up and down the country who never thought they would have to use a foodbank, yet here they are. In Aberdeen there’s still this self-perpetuating myth that we’re all rich because of the oil. It’s not true, it’s never been true. The industry is probably the worst it’s ever been and a lot of people have lost their comfortable income and find themselves in similar circumstances to those who have had generations of the same family in poverty.
Her comment about the childhood trauma of food poverty causing issues into adulthood. I 100% believe this is the case but I think, as MR has done, she should also have acknowledged the parents who are doing what they can to make sure their kids don’t know the half of what is going on. Those who don’t eat nearly enough so their kids don’t go without. The ones who are worrying about heating or eating. The ones who are already crying themselves to sleep worrying about Christmas. But she simply cannot deviate away from her ownJackanoryexperience and that coupled with zero empathy makes me shake my head every time I see she’s at one of these time wasting, back patting tit shows.
A conspiracy minded frau mught conjecture that their are some Tories who might prefer a poverty "activist" whose backstory is dubious to a more relevant and competent speaker who has done the research. It also goes a long way to explaining the expression of the Trussell Trust rep. Just imagine the double bind of knowing that someone is spouting exaggerated lying bollocks in front of an audience predisposed to believe in "scroungers"There are numerous studies (some pretty hefty longitudinal ones to boot ) that have found the impact of poverty on later negative outcomes.
Has she done the research and quoted any of them?
Not convinced. She just bangs on about her own experience, which is unique and irrelevant to anyone else and the research community.
Charlatan. Any A-level or university psychology student worth their salt could recall Farrington’s Cambridge Study.