Exactly.So all those Paypal and Patreon donations are going to instruct a lawyer.
I think we should all dress alike.See you in court Tattlers, we’re gonna need a bigger Dock!
Exactly.So all those Paypal and Patreon donations are going to instruct a lawyer.
I think we should all dress alike.See you in court Tattlers, we’re gonna need a bigger Dock!
These threads are going nowhere!Didn’t realise she’s tweeting the head honcho I thought it was all still simply being eluded to.
It seems very clear she just wants the threads gone which feels different to the first round of threats which felt more like she wanted contributors bankrupted with the “legal action is very expensive ladies” tweet. Which was then contradicted with her message that some of the posts were funny. But clearing the posts seems like an achievable legal goal so makes sense?
The thing is, we can’t delete our posts. We can’t even edit them after 10 odd mins of publishing. If we all deleted our accounts our posts would still come up. It appears she wants the threads gone, and the only people who can do that are the site themselves...
Agreed. How about this, it's bound to sway the jury.Exactly.
I think we should all dress alike.
I for one would be very angry if the threads etc were to go. No one is forcing Jack to come on here and look at anything, just like we are not forced to go to hers and look. She was on the BBC, paid for by us and we are allowed to voice our opinions on how bad, or good it was. If somethings seemed hinky we are well within our right to research it. Everything posted on here was widely available on the internet.Didn’t realise she’s tweeting the head honcho I thought it was all still simply being eluded to.
It seems very clear she just wants the threads gone which feels different to the first round of threats which felt more like she wanted contributors bankrupted with the “legal action is very expensive ladies” tweet. Which was then contradicted with her message that some of the posts were funny. But clearing the posts seems like an achievable legal goal so makes sense?
The thing is, we can’t delete our posts. We can’t even edit them after 10 odd mins of publishing. If we all deleted our accounts our posts would still come up. It appears she wants the threads gone, and the only people who can do that are the site themselves...
Good shop by Borough market.Honestly ladies I swear to god I'm going to have to go and change my knickers in a minute, I'm laughing so hard!
I wouldn't worry about the threads going anywhere. I think tattle are used to getting a threat of legal action everyday and know the law far better than Jack.I for one would be very angry if the threads etc were to go. No one is forcing Jack to come on here and look at anything, just like we are not forced to go to hers and look. She was on the BBC, paid for by us and we are allowed to voice our opinions on how bad, or good it was. If somethings seemed hinky we are well within our right to research it. Everything posted on here was widely available on the internet.
That's the thing, unless there is something we aren't seeing and people have directly harassed and intimidated her/employers/colleagues. In which case, where's the proof that it's someone from here?Is it harrassment if you go looking for negative opinions about yourself in the middle of the night on a gossip forum?
Jfc.
There isn't, because it didn't happen.where's the proof that it's someone from here?
I do love a M&S petrol garage, they always feel like such a luxury when you stumble upon them in the wild. Same with a Starbucks drive throughI’ll car share with any Midlanders for the journey to court , I’ll bring the corned beef sarnies .... actually I won’t , I’ll buy from Marks, fancy!
Nearly forgot myself for a minute.