When I tell you I GASPED!Did anyone notice in Ls pod she said on multiple occasions “the token black”… how the duck does she think it’s in any way acceptable to speak about POC like that?
The way she speaks about woke culture, you’d swear she was way older than she is. It’s not that hard to get with the times, especially as a woman in your 30sOr when she said shes coming around the idea of woke culture and is “learning”, witch you just had a stand up full of rape jokes, sit down and be humble
Start from thread 3 I guessNew to this thread guys just picking up bits and pieces here what's the best thread to read about the split and why it happened TIA
I could not believe she said that. “The token black” wtf she made another comment about “the black” but the podcast was so horrible I can’t bear to relisten to find out where it was in the ep.Did anyone notice in Ls pod she said on multiple occasions “the token black”… how the duck does she think it’s in any way acceptable to speak about POC like that?
Perfect thread name imho, it doesn’t rhyme and isn’t meanThread suggestion
It galz #13 And just like that it galz became ‘your gal’
Along this thought process then could it be possible then that L is deliberately devaluing the company so that the 3-5 year income projections will decrease and then she’ll owe J way less money? Or is the business valued at a certain point of time?If there is a buyout the person who buys the other out has full rights and usage of the existing brand. Otherwise there would be no point in a buyout. You’re paying the other owner for their good will of building 50% of the brand.
For example if we owned a biscuit company but I wanted it for myself, I’d have to get it evaluated and we would agree on a figure that represents the projected income for the company (usually for a 3-5 year period) and pay you a good-will fee which reflects the time and effort put into building the company. After we settle I can then do whatever I want with the brand as it’s 100% mine, but I’d still have to pay you out for the company you once owned. Nothing I do going forward changes the fact that you once owned 50% of said business, so no matter what, even if we never sell a biscuit again, I still owe you that original figure we agreed upon. This is why I was surprised that L began speaking of a buyout, they’re quite risky and the person taking over has to be very confident it’s financially a good idea.
if all it took was a name change to get out of paying the other owner, then people would just constantly change a business name after the contracts are signed and not pay.
Even aside from the racist remarks the episode is so negative, it’s like she’s confused critique with outright criticism. She has nothing good or nuanced to day about any of the show. The worst part is she doesn’t actually analyse the show she just talks through each scene, blow by blow, with snide remarks peppered throughoutI could not believe she said that. “The token black” wtf she made another comment about “the black” but the podcast was so horrible I can’t bear to relisten to find out where it was in the ep.
Again that wouldn’t make sense, L has been running It Galz solo for 6 months now, so safe to presume they had a figure and agreed upon it. this is why I feel J is suing (she never got the money so is suing for a debt rather than losses )Along this thought process then could it be possible then that L is deliberately devaluing the company so that the 3-5 year income projections will decrease and then she’ll owe J way less money? Or is the business valued at a certain point of time?
Ah I get you now, thanks for explaining!Even aside from the racist remarks the episode is so negative, it’s like she’s confused critique with outright criticism. She has nothing good or nuanced to day about any of the show. The worst part is she doesn’t actually analyse the show she just talks through each scene, blow by blow, with snide remarks peppered throughout
Again that wouldn’t make sense, L has been running It Galz solo for 6 months now, so safe to presume they had a figure and agreed upon it. this is why I feel J is suing (she never got the money so is suing for a debt rather than losses )
Aside from that again it wouldn’t make sense to do a valuation of a business 6 months after one of the partners left. A buyout is based on the worth of a persons shares of the company at the time of leaving. These things are straight forward, there’s no 5D chess you can play to get out of paying less
I really didn’t get this from her SATC episode at all- she said she really liked how they are now actually showing the women as parents and not as perfect parents which is valuable for the audience to see and she loved seeing Carrie and Mr Big together ? She also said she liked the Brady storyline because it’s the reality of what parents of teens have to deal with. She said she hopes they continue with the Miranda drinking problem storyline because it’s something a lot of people struggle with and again, a real problem the audience may have experienced. She called the final scene incredible and said their acting was amazing and that she cried? I agree she criticised a good few things but she also praised plentyEven aside from the racist remarks the episode is so negative, it’s like she’s confused critique with outright criticism. She has nothing good or nuanced to day about any of the show. The worst part is she doesn’t actually analyse the show she just talks through each scene, blow by blow, with snide remarks peppered throughout
Again that wouldn’t make sense, L has been running It Galz solo for 6 months now, so safe to presume they had a figure and agreed upon it. this is why I feel J is suing (she never got the money so is suing for a debt rather than losses )
Aside from that again it wouldn’t make sense to do a valuation of a business 6 months after one of the partners left. A buyout is based on the worth of a persons shares of the company at the time of leaving. These things are straight forward, there’s no 5D chess you can play to get out of paying less.
Think of it this way, if you buy a car brand new the value could be 20k, the second it drives off the lot it goes down to about 15k. You don’t get to drive it off and pay the dealer the lower worth, even though you know it’s value depreciates the second you do so.
I found it overwhelmingly negative. I’ve no issue with a negative review, it’s all subjective but I found her points most of the time to be contrarian for the sake of it. Again I feel there was a lack of analysis and it was basically a synopsis of events, like explaining scenes in the show. Would have been better if she got a cohost for that one as it lacked nuance imo but each to their ownI really didn’t get this from her SATC episode at all- she said she really liked how they are now actually showing the women as parents and not as perfect parents which is valuable for the audience to see and she loved seeing Carrie and Mr Big together ? She also said she liked the Brady storyline because it’s the reality of what parents of teens have to deal with. She said she hopes they continue with the Miranda drinking problem storyline because it’s something a lot of people struggle with and again, a real problem the audience may have experienced. She called the final scene incredible and said their acting was amazing and that she cried? I agree she criticised a good few things but she also praised plenty
Yeah kinda over the whole rhyming thread namesPerfect thread name imho, it doesn’t rhyme and isn’t mean
What’s wrong about commenting on tv shows having a token black character for the sake of racial diversity? I haven’t listened to the ep so maybe I’m missing some context.Did anyone notice in Ls pod she said on multiple occasions “the token black”… how the duck does she think it’s in any way acceptable to speak about POC like that?
The issue is referring to a black person as “a black” or “the token black” it’s dehumanising and ignorant.What’s wrong about commenting on tv shows having a token black character for the sake of racial diversity? I haven’t listened to the ep so maybe I’m missing some context.
Yeah my point was more on the choice of wording rather than the critique of tokenismThe issue is referring to a black person as “a black” or “the token black” it’s dehumanising and ignorant.
The issue is referring to a black person as “a black” or “the token black” it’s dehumanising and ignorant.
Ah, I get youYeah my point was more on the choice of wording rather than the critique of tokenism
Absolutely Gas!I thought her new episode was great tbh