Its so hard to know to believe on this thread sometimes. When she did a live a few weeks back and people were reporting back here, I had just watched the live and people were over dramatising some of the things she said to make it sound way worse. I’m not an L Stan but I can’t stand people over exaggerating to make someone else look worse so their post looks more dramatic/juicyHm that sounds v different from ‘ugly men have to rape’ …which a few people have quoted her as saying I think
She did make a comment that not all rapists are what they seem, they're not always muscly good-looking lads, in her case it was an artsy type guy.Hm that sounds v different from ‘ugly men have to rape’ …which a few people have quoted her as saying I think
What the fuck is she talking aboutShe did make a comment that not all rapists are what they seem, they're not always muscly good-looking lads, in her case it was an artsy type guy.
She invited the girl on the pod so we'll seeWith L’s track record of lying I think I’ll believe someone who was at the show over L’s account of what happened. It’s pretty safe to assume that what was said is worse than what she’s saying now considering someone stood up in a crowded room to challenge her about it. She down plays everything she does / says and makes out that she’s just misunderstood constantly. She seems to have a big issue with repeal in general..
This is a gossip page I think we all know that comments like that are what they are. But I think rule of thumb is if something is majorly through the grapevine with little to no fact in it, then don’t say it if you don’t want it spreading furtherI'm the one who said I'd heard on the grapevine that it's thought Lindsay reached out to Michael for the pod. That was met with a flurry of "OMG that is VILE" "How could she" as if it was fact.
Put me off spilling little bits of tea here because people seem so eager to blindly believe everything they read here if it's negative about Lindsay.
Ammm…the consensus here seems to be that this “isn’t that bad” but I think this is pretty bad. With her personal history of repeal I don’t think she’s the one to say people who support it are rapists?! That’s so so wrongFrom today's pod she mentions: She has experience with sexual assault, her way of dealing with it is by making jokes. Joke was about male feminists and they are the ones we should look out for. Refers to how a lot of men who support women's rights are likely to assault etc.
Her joke that night was that a lot of repeal jumpers should be used as evidence and they should say the word rapists, and if she was a rapist she would go to repeal marches. She also comments that rapists are not usually who you think they are. Then the girl in audience was like this is not funny and that's offensive and was coming towards her.
Her response was that it's a joke and some will be offensive and she should be able to make lighthearted jokes.
Anyone else who has listened feel free to chime in, hopefully I haven't misconstrued what was said.
I was at the show and said about the joke here - this is exactly it. There wasn’t one clear joke it was kind of a ramble, which I think made it worseReading everything that’s been said the main thing that sticks out is that it was really confused, lots of things were said and maybe she didn’t have a clear thread of what point she was making. I think with those kind of risky jokes you need to have a v clear point so you’re not harming or traumatising survivors. But then again I don’t know what her intentions were and I know she does like to be controversial
This.What the fuck is she talking aboutwho thinks rapists are any kind of “type”.
It’s like saying All murderers are blonde, rapists are muscly, pedos are tall and kidnappers have brown eyes.
The jokes aren’t funny cos they’re fucking dumb Lindsay not even because of the offense. She has the world views of a 14 year old
This was it for me, as if she’s the first person to notice this?As if women who have the means to pay for a ticket and get themselves into town in a Saturday night need to have their eyes opened to the phenomenon of wolves in woke jumpers.
Nail on the headWhatever the alleged punchline to the ‘joke’ was, I find this topic of comedy and offending or ‘no go’ topics so interesting and I think the biggest issue for L is that she’s not staying in her lane
when u buy a ticket to see Frankie Boyle and a joke offends you, I believe it’s your own issue,you know going in there that some of the content will be sharp however, you can’t be a podcaster who publishes episodes covering these topics seriously, sharing your own experiences and inviting victims on to share their own stories, and then get on stage a make ‘jokes’ about the same issues?!!
Joanne McNally suffered an ED and has a show about it but she stays in her lane as a professional comedian, u don’t see her asking people on her pod to share their ED stories?! Or raising funds for ED charities
L is just a shite talker who gets paid for it
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?