Are you sure you can’t find my dad??So...last year we had a discussion who Dafydd is since Alice was particulary enraged about him welcoming Bianca, especially after Alice asked him to help her winning Ioan back (I always thought it might be a uncle since Alice always talked a lot on twitter about his plumber uncle, but I doubt this now, they seem similar age)... @SusanC suggested back then that he could be a lawyer that....well, specializes in exactly what Ioan's custody case is about, especially if he does decide to move back to the UK.
Profile | Dafydd Griffiths | 29 Bedford Row
www.29br.co.uk
Dafydd is a child care practitioner with extensive expertise in all areas of both private and public law.
The emphasis of his practice is in the field of children private law which covers a wide ambit from external and internal relocation to acrimonious private law children matters involving implacable hostility and parental alienation. His cases routinely feature expert psychiatric and/or psychological opinion and sometimes require a nuanced and sensitive approach. He has further expertise in cases involving substance misuse (both drug and alcohol) and mental health issues.
He is frequently briefed in cases of domestic violence and where emotional and psychological harm is present. He undertakes injunctive relief work, both Non – molestation and Occupation Order applications, pursuant to the Family Law Act 1996
He also specialises in the fields of jurisdiction and abduction in the High Court as well as public law. In the field of Public Law he usually represents either parents or Guardians. His cases involve complex medical issues (including NAHI & FFI) or cases involving allegations of serious sexual abuse.
But we werent sure since there are many Dafydd Griffiths and didnt further discuss it.
Well, now check the video of the bloke in the water (tagged as him too) that asks Ioan if he took a video of Bianca's fall...I think it's him lol.
It's interesting to say the least.
This is such a stupid lie from Alice.(btw the character IS named)
That's right.So does this mean if they had gone collaborative Ioan would've paid it all? And Alice could be living of $58k per annum + child support for doing nothing? Is that right or am I misreading? Because if that's the case she is stupider than I thought
Tone doesn't even know what day it isTone does realise the cost of Dr Dupee is halved, right??![]()
Of course Alice will now say collaborative divorce is different, and in a way it is because you have lawyers sitting there too. But look, Alice wanted to not honour those agreements despite lawyers being there, Alice is not honouring agreements now despite the court ordering it. Alice couldnt even stick to the BASIC FOUNDATION of a divorce without lawyers of keeping your gob shot in public (the moment you write about your divorce in public lawyers are completely inevitable, everyone knows it). She outright even says in that video that if something isnt binding there is no reason why she should do it. And...with that attitude you CANNOT have a divorce without lawyers because when you do a divorce without lawyers you have to TRUST the other party to be fair. And clearly at no point she was.'At the moment we're doing something called collaborative divorce which is somewhere between a really kind way of doing divorce and a phenomenal scam.
'Because in one way it's "okay, let's hear what you would want and take it to the court afterwards" and in another way it's like, people in the acting business will know when an agent says to you "we just can't find you the roles".
'It's a bit like, I'd like my daughter to stay with me on Saturday nights, "it's just not within our possibilities".
'And then I read nothing is binding in collaborative, absolutely nothing.
'So if I want my daughter to stay one more night in my house, the court hasn't said anything so I can do it. So my husband is winding the s**t up me, saying what he says is the law, well we haven't got to the law yet.
'Lawyers aren't the law. Lawyers are there to f*** the law. That's what I always said.
Weinstein can’t disclaim what she says because that implicates him in the other cases were he was actually found guilty.“Surely he can see I’m an intelligent person”
What does she even mean by that.
I don’t believe a lot of what she’s saying here. I would believe they were in the same place at the same time so others could confirm they were present in the same location but after that I think it’s made up. She over describes everything unnecessarily which is very common with liars. It sounds very well rehearsed but untrue.