Her January tweet. Yes, Alice, we CAN believe he left because you were abusive and also insane. These past days with your destructive tweeting have reinforced it.
View attachment 1348181
If you are asked to respond to a suit, or motion or other issue pending before a court and you don't....after a set amount of time the other side wins. They win by default. And that court order is valid and enforceable. You can try to overturn it but that's usually a lot of money and time. Especially if you have been jerking the court around, ignoring its prior orders, etc.@welp ahhh ok I see! That sucks. What does 'default the divorce' mean?
So that’s her strategy? Then she can play the victim of a justice system?If you are asked to respond to a suit, or motion or other issue pending before a court and you don't....after a set amount of time the other side wins. They win by default. And that court order is valid and enforceable. You can try to overturn it but that's usually a lot of money and time. Especially if you have been jerking the court around, ignoring its prior orders, etc.
The former chief FM said that - I don’t care what you might think. We got shown the door after offering her good advice for the prior several months. She dumped us, trampled us, laughed at us, told us to piss off. 8 years of ‘servitude’ down the drain.All sorts of people have made those suggestions to her. She doesn't want to hear it. She just blows up at them and blocks them.
https://giphy.com/65os7odbIW6paSo that’s her strategy? Then she can play the victim of a justice system?
I dare Betty to spray paint it on Alice's gate.This is the best thing I’ve ever seen
CA lawyers - are there circumstances where she will be ordered to pay his costs for the DVRO? Or does that not happen?Sounds like the court told her she is responsible for her own legal fees. AAhhh, the sweet... sweet... sight of reality hitting that mountain troll smack in the face
would we get away with it as next thread title?
Oh please let this be true!CA lawyers - are there circumstances where she will be ordered to pay his costs for the DVRO? Or does that not happen?
not know - but definitely worth a trywould we get away with it as next thread title?
Listen missy - I'm fucking Meredith Gray after being with Dad in the hospital all week.She’s researching how to be a lawyer by watching tv shows or asking on Instagram isn’t she? Omg she’s Alky McBeal(ing)
August 2 is about the PRO, not custody or support or the divorce more generally. If she doesn't show up, the judge will make a decision based solely on Ioan's evidence. And is even more likely than he currently is to receive the PRO.If she fails to turn up on August 2nd, can Ioan apply for bifurcation there and then, or would they need to apply afterwards and have another court date?
That weird email to nAlice which laughably 'proves' there was no abuse.Victims of abuse learn to hide the truth of what's happening at home.
That's why we stay. We know it's going to get worse when we try to leave and it does.I cannot imagine being married to her, but divorcing her is definitely hell on earth.
Exactly this. It’s coercive control.That weird email to nAlice which laughably 'proves' there was no abuse.
IG: I am nearby the gate number on the ticket and also near the help desk.
It's like she had to know exactly where he was at all times. Who the hell would write that?? Someone under coercive control, that's who.
No wonder Tattle takes so long to load. We're on at the same time.Nah she’s using @Mad Betty internet and squatting in Ioan’s house.
she will not (though the judge might decide differently) because Ioan didnt request itCA lawyers - are there circumstances where she will be ordered to pay his costs for the DVRO? Or does that not happen?
I know that silly!It wasn't me saying she was! Tattle swear!
Yes, he could ask for his costs to paid. The judge can also order it without him requesting it.CA lawyers - are there circumstances where she will be ordered to pay his costs for the DVRO? Or does that not happen?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?