The third outfit is very Melania Trump on her way to the Republican National Convention.
The Max Mara coat is way to big on her and looks schlubby and I can’t stand all the Holland Cooper tat. Those gaudy logos should be illegal.
The third outfit is very Melania Trump on her way to the Republican National Convention.View attachment 1767207View attachment 1767208View attachment 1767210
Normally, it's just one outfit disaster. But today, she graced up with three winter outfits! They're all awful, but living in the cold part of Canada, the third outfit would give me hypothermia!
I think that she likes to say "you've all asked where I got this" so she can post an affiliate link. Because I believe they get SOMETHING for every click of an affiliate link... Probably no one has asked her where she gets her stuff from but she's always got to try and make the sale.I just realized something. If she allegedly has gotten hundreds of people asking her where her camel Max Mara coat is from, obviously these are not people who consume her content regularly. She’s talked about it weekly since she received it (brag brag “omg I can’t beeeeelieve how lucky I am that MM sent me this!” brag brag). We’ve seen it in multiple stories and Reels. I’m starting to think us Tattlers are more familiar with where her free shit is from then her own followers. Must be that pesky algorithm 🫠
Well here's the thing, no one actually asked...I just realized something. If she allegedly has gotten hundreds of people asking her where her camel Max Mara coat is from, obviously these are not people who consume her content regularly. She’s talked about it weekly since she received it (brag brag “omg I can’t beeeeelieve how lucky I am that MM sent me this!” brag brag). We’ve seen it in multiple stories and Reels. I’m starting to think us Tattlers are more familiar with where her free shit is from then her own followers. Must be that pesky algorithm 🫠
Is the ASA naming and shaming now?She got an ASA ruling. They considered that writing "a d" was not done deliberately.
Full statement and description on asa site
View attachment 1771080
So it’s it’s a mistake on Vic’s part (whatever!) we technically shouldn’t see it again. Hmmmm we will see!Is the ASA naming and shaming now?
But good on them for seeing the (a) space (d) as absolute malarkey. “Not deliberate” my ass. It’s not deliberate once or twice, not every single time.
I honestly think they just get a slap on the wrist. I’ve seen numerous rulings against boohoo, PLT, Molly Mae etc and they just continue as normalWhat exactly happens when there is an ASA ruling like this? Is it like strike one? Are there actually repercussions for influencers?
Bummer. I was hoping that Instagram would have to be a false advertising or something like that across all her posts.I honestly think they just get a slap on the wrist. I’ve seen numerous rulings against boohoo, PLT, Molly Mae etc and they just continue as normal
Where are you reporting it? Their contact form on their site? I report people quite regularly and have always heard back.That intro to vlogmas is so cringe.
I've reported her on 3 separate occasions where she has gone on holiday, clearly gifted, and not declared until weeks later and heard nothing back. I provided about 15 instagram images of her Clearly at the hotels (tagged) and no declarations, along with the posts weeks later where she suddenly declares it. They don't care or seem to follow up at all.
I’ve only reported once before and just got an automatic email advising that they would be in touch only if they decide to investigate, and everything else will be stored on a file in case they see trends, etc. I think they pick their battles.Where are you reporting it? Their contact form on their site? I report people quite regularly and have always heard back.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?