I love the 'oww' on the opening credits when Seann appears
I listened to her book last week on audible. It just sounded like the end of a bad relationship, cheating sucks, but I don’t think it classes as abusive.The thing with Sean is that none of us will ever know what actually happened in his relationship. Someone can be a very nice person, a great friend and still be toxic in a relationship. Also his ex could have been angry and reacting out of hurt.
We won't know.
I find it hard to know what to feel about him.
Yes I would. I’m a nosy fucker who would want to know. I just don’t get all the bullying claims, he’s no victim. He in my opinion is playing the biggest game in there. Are people trying to say they haven’t talked about anyone behind their backs, because that’s bullshit we all have.I think those in glass houses shouldn’t throw stones! Let’s look at those who’ve been the worst towards him - BG - convicted criminal who’s spent time in prison, Mike Tindall, twice convicted drink driver, Sue Cleaver, drink driver, Chris Moyles - tax avoider and offering to take the virginity of an underage girl. Please.
The ones looking down their left wing noses the most at MH are hardly paragons of virtue themselves are they?
Presumably if you were in there asking him questions you’d be asking a fair few more of this lot about their dubious pasts too?
Agreed. I personally don't think people should be there if they have to have exemptions for things, however then ITV might run the risk of discrimination suits because it would exclude a lot of people, so it's a difficult one.Doodlebug005 said:Should she be there if she is not fit? How do some of them pass medicals ( the trial exclusion people not just picking on Sue) I would love to see footage of George throwing a hissy fit , stealing the apple and hiding behind a treecourse they won’t show that or the being ferried around on golf carts
I don’t think any of the camp mates would be saying what they really think of their in laws, even those that aren’t famous!Yes I would. I’m a nosy fucker who would want to know. I just don’t get all the bullying claims, he’s no victim. He in my opinion is playing the biggest game in there. Are people trying to say they haven’t talked about anyone behind their backs, because that’s bullshit we all have.
Although in Mikes case I’d be more interested to find out what he thinks of the royal family.
Its funny mike hasnt mentioned the royals...guess hes banned.I don’t think any of the camp mates would be saying what they really think of their in laws, even those that aren’t famous!
“Crying anxiety”?I admire Matt for his resilience im over the whole Covid debacle, but i admire a few qualities in him. Least you survive life that way unlike the younger generation crying anxiety every 2 minutes. It was interesting them saying hes not authentic i guess thats not great but theyre not all friends are they? Hes doing what he can to stay in. I loved what BG said too about creative people cause a stir its so right and thats what makes them more interesting. They go against convention.
TrueI don’t think any of the camp mates would be saying what they really think of their in laws, even those that aren’t famous!
I agree there is a pattern, and maybe im being very basic here but its basic demographics…maybe black people are less inclined to watch and vote for reality tv shows….There's no theory behind why black people, especially women, are consistently unpopular with the British public whenever there's a vote. It's an uncomfortable truth, but it takes some impressive mental gymnastics to deny there's a pattern.
Yup. Young people love a label. Its called life and you get on with it.“Crying anxiety”?
Bit harsh.
Ah yes but where do you draw the line? Take me for instance, I can't swim so water trials would be out. I'd have a panic attack in a confined space, so exempt from going down holes or locked in boxes. I have a fear of heights and I'd get a funny tummy if I ate the wrong stuff - so more exemptions. And if I even see ONE spider I'd run a mile.Agreed. I personally don't think people should be there if they have to have exemptions for things, however then ITV might run the risk of discrimination suits because it would exclude a lot of people, so it's a difficult one.
This is them inciting this. Then the brain dead people who hang onto the DMs every word will blame POC for being extra sensitive and ‘woke’ (btw I hate how that word has been co-opted and is completely misused now. Ugh)The DM caption on the article about IAC being racist after two black women are “voted out” first. You couldn’t make this up
View attachment 1749702
Mental illness is a real thing, so is ignoranceYup. Young people love a label. Its called life and you get on with it.
Oh, for FUCKS sake!!!!!!!!!Sorry if this has been posted already:
View attachment 1748921
Can’t say I’m surprised. Charlene is not very reflective and I suspect she will jump on this to save face.
I'd be crap too. I wouldn't be able to do those eating trials. Just watching that one Mike and Jill did made me feel queasyAh yes but where do you draw the line? Take me for instance, I can't swim so water trials would be out. I'd have a panic attack in a confined space, so exempt from going down holes or locked in boxes. I have a fear of heights and I'd get a funny tummy if I ate the wrong stuff - so more exemptions. And if I even see ONE spider I'd run a mile.
Basically, I like my creature comforts - and I'm a wuss at times
I am a POC and race has absolutely nothing to do with who I vote for or notI agree there is a pattern, and maybe im being very basic here but its basic demographics…maybe black people are less inclined to watch and vote for reality tv shows….
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?