- Notice
heejeebejee
Active member
Why is Iain Lee skint. He’s getting money from his mum. Why? His grifting has been on point.. what went wrong?
I don’t get it.
Also, there’s a very predatory vibe re him using the “ohh don’t cancel me “ phrase, after everything he says, that is dodgy. It’s just dodgy… (this is textbook behaviour from a troubled individual,like him)
In years to come , we will say why did we miss it…) Always the way.
This chancer is a qualified counsellor now . He’s bought a new sofa bed. FFS.
Serouisly?
I don’t get it.
Also, there’s a very predatory vibe re him using the “ohh don’t cancel me “ phrase, after everything he says, that is dodgy. It’s just dodgy… (this is textbook behaviour from a troubled individual,like him)
In years to come , we will say why did we miss it…) Always the way.
This chancer is a qualified counsellor now . He’s bought a new sofa bed. FFS.
Serouisly?
Charles the Furred
Active member
I think the contents could have been written by anyone in this thread, given the mass of speculation about these things in recent days. However, it turns out they were unequivocally written by Gregorian, which presumably means they're true.
As for his style, I'm only familiar with his short form tweets, so it wasn't immediately obvious to me. I have no doubt now though.
As for his style, I'm only familiar with his short form tweets, so it wasn't immediately obvious to me. I have no doubt now though.
Gingerbread King
Member
General Kim
Chatty Member
WOPHD is comedy gold. The beady eyed toad does make me laugh so much...even before he opens his gob and says something thick and banal on his Twitch. It's so much better than TLNA.
I honestly can't work out why his wife dumped him.
A video capture card isn't expensive and WOPHD is grifting for money.
What next? DogFacedDave is going to crowd fund for a new record player? Matty Stevo will do a GoFundMe to pay for some TLNA merch?
How about stop buying VHS tapes for a bit and buy the video capture card? Or an even better idea. Just stop.
I'm sure we will manage without WOPHD's grubby little weirdo hobby.
Pat Mustard
Active member
Books that tell stories that involve sexual acts.
Mermaids and Stonewall are pushing such "age inappropriate" reading material to pre teens.
Anyway.
I'm aware this has strayed way off course as to Iain Lee.
But all the same I as a parent will always challenge the creeping acceptance of mainstreaming paedophilia.
Or grooming as it is known.
How about the case when some "act" sat down with his legs open "displaying" himself in front of primary school kids?
As for Iain.
Your right.
There's only so much to say.
I think the subject is well and truly covered.
What adults choose to see is their own affair.
I've nothing against Drag Acts.
Just not around the kids, eh.
Last edited:
ohannie
VIP Member
Yes, I've listened to every show so far. I've already given my thoughts on the "bantz"in the post you quoted.
Apart from the only callers being the dull and annoying idiots that call him on everything else (Alistair, Fatford, Sloop, that Irish guy, etc - WOPHD hasn't called yet) it's actually a pretty good show (though I would recommend only listening on repeat so you can skip through the relentless adverts, news, songs and traffic updates.
Pat Mustard
Active member
I was thinking the same thing.
It's the sort of settee that gets "gifted" to a chara shop, who come and collect, to save a trip to the tip.
I'm sure the fu*kwit fanclub are beside themselves with the promise the "pay per view" show.
This will make up for the Benn vs Eubank canceled event.
"Confirmed batchelors"
That's an old term for the likes of "loose in his loafers" Cliff Richard.
In fact I think it was one of his early hits.
No. It was "Batchelor Boy"
The signs were all there though.
Sue Barker was just Cliff's "beard"
You know like Renate was Elton's
No the Gays wouldn't want the likes of Alistair, WOPHD, and Gutfood.
Oh no.
Last edited:
heejeebejee
Active member
Ok. I’m a bit gutted that it’s still working for them on that level, cos that’s going to prolong the problem.
My feelings are very black and white but they clearly have created enough grey to get by.
thislifesucks
Active member
Lol, he blocked the account I made already!! But at least he knows, that we know!
General Kim
Chatty Member
That's a new and different point.
The original point being that exactly what "y5mwqwrx4m" published (the four page statement) could have been done by anyone on this thread.
That means: wording up the statement word-for-word as The Big G did, presenting it in the identical way The Big G did and most importantly the content. All based on copying the writing style of The Big G's tweets - which is totally different to how he wrote in the four page statement.
If people want to believe "anyone" could have done that statement, then fine. It's their right to immediately jump to the conclusion that it was a set-up, ostensibly in a TLNA cultist hope that it wasn't true and Eyan is the righteous victim of a smear.
It's almost like a TLNA cultist can't bear the thought The Big G has exposed and blown the lid off Mr Eyan Lee.. and the undercover TLNA cultist was desperately looking for any excuse to dismiss and discredit The Big G.
The "factual content" on this thread doesn't come close to the content in The Big G's statement. So the point that someone reading this thread could knock up that four page statement based on what they've read is an absolute non-starter.
If anything, it was my speculation that turned out to be 100% correct. All of it. It was specifically my analysis that The Big G has confirmed as being correct.
I was speculating and got it 100% correct. At the time it wasn't a fact. Now it is.
So is it being suggested that it's possible someone read this thread, read my speculation, wrote that four page statement, pretended to be The Big G and emulated with perfect accuracy his professional legal writing style, thought processes and content plus added a load of facts that are not contained on this thread?
All in a bid to fool us.
"Could have been written by anyone". OK. I suppose anything is possible...
The original point being that exactly what "y5mwqwrx4m" published (the four page statement) could have been done by anyone on this thread.
That means: wording up the statement word-for-word as The Big G did, presenting it in the identical way The Big G did and most importantly the content. All based on copying the writing style of The Big G's tweets - which is totally different to how he wrote in the four page statement.
If people want to believe "anyone" could have done that statement, then fine. It's their right to immediately jump to the conclusion that it was a set-up, ostensibly in a TLNA cultist hope that it wasn't true and Eyan is the righteous victim of a smear.
It's almost like a TLNA cultist can't bear the thought The Big G has exposed and blown the lid off Mr Eyan Lee.. and the undercover TLNA cultist was desperately looking for any excuse to dismiss and discredit The Big G.
The "factual content" on this thread doesn't come close to the content in The Big G's statement. So the point that someone reading this thread could knock up that four page statement based on what they've read is an absolute non-starter.
If anything, it was my speculation that turned out to be 100% correct. All of it. It was specifically my analysis that The Big G has confirmed as being correct.
I was speculating and got it 100% correct. At the time it wasn't a fact. Now it is.
So is it being suggested that it's possible someone read this thread, read my speculation, wrote that four page statement, pretended to be The Big G and emulated with perfect accuracy his professional legal writing style, thought processes and content plus added a load of facts that are not contained on this thread?
All in a bid to fool us.
"Could have been written by anyone". OK. I suppose anything is possible...
SquirrelWatch
Member
Yes they are all hoping for promotion in the BBC. One of them even said it makes the energy bills theft look insignificant.#goodinnings
How much more can they squeeze out of the sad passing of a elderly woman?
The inane drivel of reporters with their "say what you see" desciption of what is clearly visible on ANY modern television set for the viewer to observe themselves.
"It ain't radio no more, darlin'"
And spare me the kneeling down at the flowers and reading the messages.
Especially the scribblings of some halfwit's imagination of what is going on in the after life , yer know, "up there".
Then there's the literal serious face emoji expressions they wear and the "give it some gravitas" utterances.
Speculation abounds as to what each member of the Royal family may be thinking and feeling.
It really does pad out the content.
They'll get some old royal brownoser who will bang on about procedures like that awful Witchell character.
And I'm really sure that Iain's ex made the right decision changing her coat from a practical everyday affair to a big news garment.
And to be like a royal correspondent for a moment
"I wonder what Prince Philip would make of this?"
Phil the Greek "Just bloody get on with it."
Excellent scene
Iain would have joined in with this if he was a BBC reporter...
SquirrelWatch
Member
Where did he reply - on Twitter? I can't see anything unless you mean thisIain has replied!
What a time to be alive
Attachments
whybrows
Well-known member
dontfalter
Member
Did he speak about this when he first came out of the jungle? Just curious as I’ve only seen him talking about her bullying him since the whole wagatha Christie debacle…Back on the radio
Back in the news
Iain Lee tells 'bully' Becky Vardy not to use him as part of her rehabilitation
Iain Lee has passionately responded to Rebekah Vardy's claim she doesn't have a bad word to say about him, amid his belief she bullied him during their stint in the jungle together five years ago - something she denieswww.mirror.co.uk
Pat Mustard
Active member
I shall do as that other chap suggests and will not engage with correspondents that....well.... we'll leave it there, shall we.
Bunking off will covid.
That's so 2021.
You're right that he has most probably grown tired of the daily grind.
He isn't getting the money or audience.
He may have a point on the station's music and heavy ad saturation.
Iain has found himself in an Alighierian 90's hits purgatory.
Last edited:
thislifesucks
Active member
So…. Who’s going to call in??
heejeebejee
Active member
If you want to feel that way you can.
I’ve been clear about my objective. Iain Lee should not have access to callers numbers because he abuses them. He has done this at at least 2 stations that have employed him. It’s grubby and a bit dodgy.
When he was given a new platform on Jack FM, for me, that red flagged because of the previous behaviours.
I raised my concerns. I received a response that indicated an assurance that Iain did not deal with calls or have access to numbers. I thought…ok.
However, he is having access to callers numbers and dealing with calls. So there goes that assurance. I think that’s a problem.
I will say, I think referring to someone as insane, it’s unpleasant.
I have different views to you. That’s all.
I know why I’m making my posts and I’m happy with my reasoning.
Pat Mustard
Active member
Ooff!
You REALLY don't like Trigger Happy Dom.
I've not bothered to listen since his controversial/contrived stunt.
That and he immediately went into blue haired student mode by callling other radio presenters facists.
That's an insult to facists for starters.
Well ...you have seen them.
They wouldn't pass muster with Mussolini. And that's for sure.
Facists indeed!
And don't even get me started on the everyone being a blinking nazi, nowadays.
I think Hitler has suffered enough posthumous abuse without lumping him in with the sorry state of people that pass for "nazis" these days.
Anyway lifey. (I can call you that can't I?)
Don't get lobbing the trannie out the window the next time you hear Dom.
thislifesucks
Active member
I quite enjoyed watching him cry, might watch it again.