The logical reasons are sex selection (not legal in the UK) and the surrogacy theory. Or both. Although if you have a flaky and potentially uncooperative husband, that's another reason to bank 'multiple viable embryos' pre-wedding.Exactly. The success rate for IVF is 20-35% (decreasing with every round. After 3 full cycles you are at 45-53% success rate). So not much different than normal IF you don’t have a reason to use IVF. Going the IVF route will not have brought any benefit if there wasn’t a need to do. I can definitely see her doing some fertility treatments (medicinal) or IVF (but this means she would have had several diagnostics and medicinal treatment rounds before, if there wasn’t an obvious reason to go straight to IVF), but the timeline for the first pregnancy was just too close. IVF is not a success guarantee and even a surrogate pregnancy (if you believe that) cannot be timed like that.
'Princess Lives Matter'The amount of mental gymnastics these two do with regards to their privacy is mind boggling and by and large, utterly frivolous.
I hope that the interview isn’t dominated with their viewpoint on Diana and the media in an attempt to start a Princess Lives Matter movement.
Speedy recovery to the DoE
I dont have a clear idea about what went on!Exactly. The success rate for IVF is 20-35% (decreasing with every round. After 3 full cycles you are at 45-53% success rate). So not much different than normal IF you don’t have a reason to use IVF. Going the IVF route will not have brought any benefit if there wasn’t a need to do. I can definitely see her doing some fertility treatments (medicinal) or IVF (but this means she would have had several diagnostics and medicinal treatment rounds before, if there wasn’t an obvious reason to go straight to IVF), but the timeline for the first pregnancy was just too close. IVF is not a success guarantee and even a surrogate pregnancy (if you believe that) cannot be timed like that.
If it were up to me I would give you Anne Sacoolas no strings attached. We have no use for her and she is only causing problems.That bloody wedding.As I watched it, it was like Richard Curtis wrote it. It was like "Notting Hill 2-Wokester Boogaloo"
If they did go for gender selection (even it was for a girl), how does that jive with their superior moral values? This process is used to eliminate female foetuses, how is that feminist?
To that I would say to the Americans, handover Anne Sacoolas and then we will talk.
It's possible she could have had eggs frozen when she was with Trevor. Weren't they supposedly planning children at one point? She could have had them frozen with no intent on follow-through with him, and when Hazzno came along, she had them ready to go.That 'blind' not sure if I trust it, pretty sure they are drip fed info from Sunshite sucks. However it makes sense that a psycho such as her would have had her aging eggs frozen at the first hint of the crown jewels. I mean she probably had him wanking into a pot on the second date
Probably as part of a roast chicken session
Are you Ok?Just like Meghan wanted to take over the Royal Family, eh?
Please feel free as ‘yanks‘ to ‘take over the boards’ (your words, not mine). I, for one, will not be posting here ever again if you ‘yanks‘ ’take over the boards’.
How very tone deaf at this moment in time to make such a crass statement when international relations are all over the place. I seek solidarity with other countries, not division and take overs. You may say your comment was meant to be light hearted but it really struck a nerve with me and I found it very insensitive and rude, especially in the midst of a global pandemic. And especially after Brexit where the EU seems determined to make the UK regret leaving.
I have no wish to fall out, I just wanted to put my point across to say that your comment was offensive to me.
Don't apologise for welcoming a fellow countryman in a humourous way.I'm very sorry and you would be the last person I would mean to offend. You're one of the kindest people here and have a heart too valuable to be broken. Please accept my apology.
I know, it's so bizarre but this is missy perfect. Everything must be perfect. Smelly dipstix in the church FFS! The emerald tiara that poor Eugenie is still getting abuse over. Her child must not be born imperfectly. The birth will be perfect, everything wonderful, no problems . She couldn't even take a shit in the woods without birdies dipped in paint decorating the skies overhead. It's all about her controlling everything to the nth.IVF - but with a surrogate? Since there were concerns whether she could carry to term?
Oh, and my bet is on Canada the first time round - what about now? (Given various covid restrictions etc).
About the secrecy - if they used the surrogate, then obvious reasons for secrecy (succession line etc), but IVF with her carrying? No reason to be ashamed of it at all, could have done it all in the open - EXCEPT that when you have things to hide from your past, you don't want people to start asking questions...and she wanted a baby boy, quick, to cement any potential alimony payments in the future.
I was literally about to ask that. If he does have a squint, is that not something you can genetically mess about with? I don't know how far it goes with all that side of things. It'll be really interesting to see if this baby gets pushed front and centre compared to how they've hidden Archie away.I know, it's so bizarre but this is missy perfect. Everything must be perfect. Smelly dipstix in the church FFS! The emerald tiara that poor Eugenie is still getting abuse over. Her child must not be born imperfectly. The birth will be perfect, everything wonderful, no problems . She couldn't even take a shit in the woods without birdies dipped in paint decorating the skies overhead. It's all about her controlling everything to the nth.
It scares me that the genetics can be messed with just because she must produce perfection. It's ironic that archiedoll def has/had that slight eye defect (that was perfectly nicely put) and she had no control over that.
I thought that last night. I recall reading somewhere from a PR guy that celeb PR sometimes pay for blind items to do the rounds.That 'blind' not sure if I trust it, pretty sure they are drip fed info from Sunshite sucks. However it makes sense that a psycho such as her would have had her aging eggs frozen at the first hint of the crown jewels. I mean she probably had him wanking into a pot on the second date
Probably as part of a roast chicken session
Perhaps the squint is a hereditary thing. After all, Lady Louise has one.I know, it's so bizarre but this is missy perfect. Everything must be perfect. Smelly dipstix in the church FFS! The emerald tiara that poor Eugenie is still getting abuse over. Her child must not be born imperfectly. The birth will be perfect, everything wonderful, no problems . She couldn't even take a shit in the woods without birdies dipped in paint decorating the skies overhead. It's all about her controlling everything to the nth.
It scares me that the genetics can be messed with just because she must produce perfection. It's ironic that archiedoll def has/had that slight eye defect (that was perfectly nicely put) and she had no control over that.
Was going to suggest that. They are never truthful. I wondered if the "Fell to the floor singing lullabies " poetic miscarriage was a loss of one twin and the second twin survived and is either about to be born or has been born already. Hence all the "WOO-HOO!" celebratory unusual image release ... as in "We can do this now that baby is safely arrived or about to pop out".Looking at a lightened photo of M & H wearing masks and coats (Oct/Nov time) on the previous thread made me wonder whether a second baby has already arrived?
They were either bored or laughing/frowning/wincing. Elton John's face was priceless . Cam and Kate used their hats to hide that they were laughing. Bea kept looking around trying to not laugh. It was all so mega cringe!Yes, the preacher at the wedding did not read the room. AT ALL. Like those who hired him, he was too self absorbed and full of his own self importance, esp at a Royal Wedding. He should’ve looked at the bored faces in the crowd. - people examining their nails and looking thorough the Hymn book - and then wrapped the boring diatribe up.
Alas, he didn’t. He carried on. Even Camilla and Kate were giving each other the side eye as if to say, “When will this prick shut the fuck up! I am dying for a fag and there are glasses of champagne with my name on them inside!”
It seemed SMeghan Didn’t pick up on the public mood that day, ie shut the fuck up and let’s move on! Nowt against the religious fella. He should’ve kept it short and sweet, that’s all. Instead, like Smeggy, he used the opportunity to his advantage. He milked his appearance dry. Everyone thought he was a bit of a boring twat afterwards.
Could it be that only Brits can pick up these things? There were personal slights. Etiquette no-nos, show off vicars and all the rest of it. Did only the U.K. public recognise these things?
Sarcasm for one thing is very misunderstood outside the U.K. We can call our best mate ‘a bit of a knob’ and laugh about it. We can tell someone to ‘get a life!’ and still be best pals forever. We can joke about our friends’ hair, “Who cut THAT?! Did you pay them????’.
Piers Morgan would be THE best person to grill this grifter! If given free rein, which I bet he wouldn’t be granted, he would go very deep, and very hard (Ooh! I say!). Smegz would end up revealing stuff she never meant to as Piers would flummox the stupid, vacuous bint.
Question: who is thickest? Smegz or Hazzno?
I vote Hazzno, but she ain’t far behind. The British public has seen through her good and proper. Like I said before...Fool us once, more fool us. Fool us twice, more fool YOU. THAT is how the British public feel now. They are determined not be fooled again by this fake-as-fuck Disney Princess any more.
Well, hello there! Great to have you posting here, especially as you are from over the pond! A very warm welcome to you
Go, go go! Welcome! So amazing to have all you lurkers come out and join in. It really shows the strength of feeling across the world. I noticed lots of DM comments were from people in places like Norway, Sweden, Australia, NZ, Canada, and USA. It is not just people in the U.K. who are rung out by these two. It is a worldwide feeling.
I think it was said that Lady Louise's squint is a result of the traumatic birth (could be wrong). I remember someone at the time suggesting that they were worried that she might be blind. It was a really serious situation and Sophie + baby nearly died.Perhaps the squint is a hereditary thing. After all, Lady Louise has one.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?