leave him with Commodore of Small Ships. oh my goodness that would be perfect
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
New Thread Title Suggestion:
Harry & Megan #58: Ginge n Cringe have gone all shy?! Now, THAT is just ANOTHER lie! Sigh.
My first thoughts were Tim Inskip as well! Can you imagine if is it him? 
Harry & Megan #58: Ginge n Cringe have gone all shy?! Now, THAT is just ANOTHER lie! Sigh.
HaHa
My first thoughts were Tim Inskip as well! Can you imagine if is it him? 
I agree with you, but maybe he's gone with the fact that even if 50 guys helped word it and fact check it ... it was still a personal letter and he's likely bored off his tits with it all so stripped it to that basic fact. No different to an author using factcheckers and proof readers, the finished item is still the authors.
I'm hoping ANL appeal and get to produce the evidence of just how non-personal it was before Thomas even got a sniff of it. The fact checkers, palace aides etc are one thing, but sharing content with 5 twats who swim in the same cess pool of fame whores and whose noses should have been kept out of it makes it more like an open letter to the New York Times.
***********************************************
I accepted your last night's challenge, here you go.
The aftermath.
omg - that is .... that is.... just.... so ..... wrong! on so many levels!
[hushed voice - (but brilliant! omg!! thank you!!! and with a chaser? - masterpiece.)]
[hushed voice - (but brilliant! omg!! thank you!!! and with a chaser? - masterpiece.)]
As far as I’m aware Skippy is a middle age woman who lives in Canada with her husband. She claims to have many sources including a woman who worked for a PR company that Meghan tried to hire when she first came to the UK. There is a lot of stuff but she is adamant that there is a bigger picture beyond Meghan & there are backers who put Meghan in place with Harry to blackmail the Royal Family. I will find some stuff to post here.
Welcome @SnowyCal ! Good to see you delurking and ready to join in the fun discussing the gruesome twosome!
I think I have seen a screenshot or two from this Skippy character. It’s not Harry’s former BFF Tom Inskip is it?!?!?!? Wouldn’t that be hilarious! Does this Skippy mention their connection or source to M&H? Do you have anything interesting from this person to share here as I don't think many use Tumblr?
I fully agree with you. ANL did not get chance to gather and present all their evidence regrading all those who had already seen the letter, helped to write it, proof read it, fact checked it, emailed it back and forth, talked about it, checked its legality, shared it with five friends, revealed its existence to People Magazine. Megz had not provided access to her texts and emails to the five friends nor had the Palace Four been asked to provide statements to declare how involved, or not, they were. I just hope one or more of the Palace Four stakes a claim to part of the copyright so that any damages will have to be shared. If it becomes known that MM did not own full copyright, this would most certainly aid ANL’s appeal of the privacy ruling. Come on THE PALACE FOUR!!!Sorry Freda - I hit send too quickly!! my point (which I didn't make but instead made a bolognese) - is that ANL weren't saying that she is not entitled to her privacy. I think they fully agreed that she is entitled to her privacy. and she is! but that the publication of the letter, which had been seen by many and was willingly handed to them by the wronged person trying to make clear what was said (as the letter was being misquoted/misrepresented) was NOT a breach of her privacy as the letter was no longer, had never been and wasn't intended to be private. they were trying to point out she had broken her own privacy already. and that so many sentences were included was to to set straight the SO MANY misrepresentations that had been made.
Sorry - just trying to point out that 1) I'm in no way qualified to opine on such matters, however, 2) in my quiet little Tattler corner, rocking back and forth, murmuring to myself on my keyboard maniacally, I might armchair Perry Mason on a matter
he might also double down.... and man that would piss me off NO END. has anyone checked his meds lately? hmmmm
I had been reading the army forum but I cant remember the URL, please can you provide a link so I can have another nosey. Those guys, and gals (I noted one) are brutal!!! We should join them for a party if Megz and Haz get dethroned etc!What can I say?...Just amazing!
Maybe you're onto something and Smeggy will reveal it's a multiple pregnancy during the interview.
Is anyone still reading the arrse Army forum thread? It's come to life in the last couple of days. For those who were worrying that we were too nasty on here, they make us look like pussycats
How could she deny they don’t have tabloid type press in the US? Did she think we were all thick oiks like her? In fact, due to more relaxed privacy and libel laws in the US, their tabloids go even deeper and present complete untruths as fact. She is a bleeping balloon knot!
Cheers! I will have a lookSkippy on Tumblr
I will link it for you
SKIPPY
Here to support the BRF! Any stories offered and any articles published are the opinion of the...
Last edited:
I’ve tried to find some of the photos they reckon were photoshopped but one of the main ones was the airport runway picture of them going away on holiday before they got married. People who are good at photoshop did stuff to the photo to try prove Meghan edited the photo.
The Skippy community also believe Meghan is using a Harry lookalike for pictures too & also believe Archie does not exist, he’s a doll & she used a surrogate but I get the impression from reading here, that’s a wide spread thought.
Wow! I’ve seen this a few times recently and it drops my jaw every time. Smeggy really is a total twit. And she couldn’t even be bothered to get a nice crisp properly white shirt to get it right. Just a crusty, much-washed and no longer white travesty. At least she’s consistent
Sure, here it is...enjoy! https://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/harry-and-megan-how-long-will-it-last.277296/page-475I had been reading the army forum but I cant remember the URL, please can you provide a link so I can have another nosey. Those guys, and gals (I noted one) are brutal!!! We should join them for a party if Megz and Haz get dethroned etc!
How could she deny they don’t have tabloid type press in the US? Did she think we were all thick oiks like her? In fact, due to more relaxed privacy and libel laws in the US, their tabloids go even deeper and present complete untruths as fact. She is a bleeping balloon knot!
Cheers! I will have a look
Balloon knot, that's brilliant
My husband was completely flummoxed by that expression a few years ago when he had some old guy come to see him about his 'balloon knot".
Laughter is the greatest music in the world and audiences come to my shows to escape the cares of life. They don't want to be embarrassed or insulted. They want to laugh and so do I - which is probably why it works.
@freda19 I understand what you are saying about the judge stripping the privacy case down to its bare bones BUT there were still many other people involved in its drafting, checking, publication, and eventual sharing. Well before her dad even got to read it.
To quote a line in your earlier post: “No different to an author using factcheckers and proof readers, the finished item is still the authors.”
This is very true of many authors, I agree, they do use several other sources in order to complete their works. However, the difference to Smeggy is that authors of books, screenplays or whatever usually publish their work for wider public consumption. That is the aim of their game - to publish and let others read their work. They seek facts and advice and then publish it for public consumption. They do not claim their work to be completely private and confidential, like Smeggy, and they do not start suing libraries or shops for stocking their work because it breaches their privacy. Smeggy has done what authors do but, unlike authors, she has claimed erosion of privacy and misuse copyright when she had no grounds to do so, IMO.
To quote a line in your earlier post: “No different to an author using factcheckers and proof readers, the finished item is still the authors.”
This is very true of many authors, I agree, they do use several other sources in order to complete their works. However, the difference to Smeggy is that authors of books, screenplays or whatever usually publish their work for wider public consumption. That is the aim of their game - to publish and let others read their work. They seek facts and advice and then publish it for public consumption. They do not claim their work to be completely private and confidential, like Smeggy, and they do not start suing libraries or shops for stocking their work because it breaches their privacy. Smeggy has done what authors do but, unlike authors, she has claimed erosion of privacy and misuse copyright when she had no grounds to do so, IMO.
Sorry, should've quoted that - they were the words of Ken Dodd.
We all know that Harry and whatsiname are a pair of what Freda says; but hey, they give us some great entertainment!
We all know that Harry and whatsiname are a pair of what Freda says; but hey, they give us some great entertainment!
That picture of Harry on the bus without Meghan is California. And it looks like Harry.
They may not be together, but, he was definitely in California.
Look at the minging pit sweat stains!!!!!Wow! I’ve seen this a few times recently and it drops my jaw every time. Smeggy really is a total twit. And she couldn’t even be bothered to get a nice crisp properly white shirt to get it right. Just a crusty, much-washed and no longer white travesty. At least she’s consistent
She must reek of onions
You’d think she would invest in a good deodorant for hot climes. Smegma? I thoroughly recommend Mitchum roll-on.
It’s a great euphemism isn’t it?! Along with rusty Sheriff’s badge and chocolate starfish!Sure, here it is...enjoy! https://www.arrse.co.uk/community/threads/harry-and-megan-how-long-will-it-last.277296/page-475
Balloon knot, that's brilliant
Thank you very much for sharing the link to those bitchy army boys! They really are worse than us lot!
I thought it was a bit strange that Smegma didn’t accompany Hazzno on the James Corden bus tour and karaoke singalong. We know she doesnt usually let him out of her sight. It would‘ve been the perfect opportunity to showcase her sparkling wit and bantz with Corden, along with her sweet angelic singing voice.
I reckon the invite was for Hazzno only to push the ‘two Brits having a laugh in the US’ theme. Smegma was surplus to requirements and would’ve dampened down the laddish bantz. I bet she gave him HELL when he got home. Hazzno had probably got really drunk and spilled his guts to Corden. Hey! Has anyone checked Corden’s Twitter? He may know some juicy stuff, but unfortunately for us, will keep schtum.
Attachments
Last edited:
Rather annoyingly, ANL had the chance/time to gather their evidence, having asked *(and were granted) the right to include FF. They did not present a challenge to the postponement -- so all terribly accommodating.
Ergo the "Palace 4". which is - and tattlers please correct me as I am swimming out of my depth here - unprecedented.
They were primed, primped.... and ready to pounce..... and then a princely ""poof!"
******
nay nay you shall not present a single WORD of your position [even though I said you should get access to , and be granted to present, email and sms and FF a few weeks ago]
SHE IS UNTOUCHABLE
sunburnt bald patch. oh man......
Smegma didn’t go on the bus with Hazard because she’s “pregnant” and wanted to keep it hidden at that time.
Please, excuse me, I have had a few drinks. I cannot understand what your post is alluding to. Please can you just ’say it how it is’? I am trying to read between the lines and I am drawing a blank.
Seriously, I usually love your posts as they are so on point. Alas, I cannot make head nor tail of your last one. Please could you summarise? I don’t wish to offend but I don’t understand your meaning.
- Status