Shortened to Vicky as in Vicky Pollard
Shortened to Vicky as in Vicky PollardOoh yes Victoria. No one has dared use that as a name.
Victoria Elizabeth Diana
Archie was Prince George’s family alias / nickname. He once told a dog Walker that was his name. Smeg was pregnant at the time the article came out.
Prince George 'tells dog walker he's actually called Archie'
He apparently had a secret nickname we didn't know about.metro.co.uk
Id say the men in grey suits would have been prepared for another baby in their many plans. They have been doing this a lot longer than meggy.God I had the most awful thought, what if this is part of her fkn bullshit narrative for the megxit review?? We all know there is no coincidence with these shady cunts but being the grifters they are Rachael has set this narrative up quite nicely. Announcing she is expecting (not pregnant) after a catastrophic mythcarriage in Nov sets the stage for the extension being granted. Be warned and prepared. I really think BP has got it wrong with these two and methinks there will be an extension
Jane Moore will know a lot - she's a good, old school, thorough journalist and very well connected.Jane Moore is / was a tabloid journalist. Didn‘t she work for The Sun (part of ANL)? I bet she is seething underneath at what these two grifters have done straight after their court case ‘win’. She will be able to see right through them.
Not sure about the 'close to five months pregnant' bit, if pregnancy was the confidential reason for the trial delay at the end of October. Think she/surrogate is more like 26 weeks now, due in May or even earlier. Remember, she's got that May People cover organised!Plans are already in place for a “low-key” celebration to mark the Duke of Edinburgh’s 100th birthday on June 10 which, ordinarily, Harry would be expected to attend.
The centenary conveniently falls two days before the Queen’s annual birthday parade on June 12, meaning this year’s will be a “super” Trooping the Colour.
While no one knows quite what travel restrictions will be in place by then due to the coronavirus pandemic, the Sussexes are guaranteed to be on the guest list.
Meghan’s pregnancy, however, has not only put paid to her travel plans but also potentially those of her husband if her due date is around the same time.
Although the couple have not confirmed any timings, the 39-year-old former Suits star is thought to be close to five months pregnant - making mid-June a potential no fly zone for Harry.
Sources close to the couple have so far refused to speculate on which, if any, of the key engagements Harry may attend, continuing to cite the uncertainty around Covid.
One date that is thought to have been firmly inked into the diary, however, is July 1. Marking what would have been the 60th birthday of Diana, Princess of Wales, it is when a statue in her honour is finally being unveiled in Kensington Palace Gardens.
Daily Mail on how she hid bump
She was never given a fair trial?Harry was a darling of the press when he was with the Cressidas and the Chelsea's.Blonde,upper class.There was a very interesting article in the daily mail about 10 years ago,Harry went to some miss world show(details are sketchy,dont know where this was)anyway out of a long line of women he chose a black woman to take out for a dance.The comment section picked up on this and said Harry always had a preference for black women and would go on to marry a black woman one day.I found it interesting as this was well before Megs.I still think there is strong enough racist view held in British establishments like the media and royalty that would have never have given her a fair shot.I dont like her but she was never given a fair trial.I'm surprised that this is never picked up on but all the royal women are treated like shit,the media never fawned over the only female child the queen had,Princess Ann..Meghan you never stood a chance.
Was it this one?Harry was a darling of the press when he was with the Cressidas and the Chelsea's.Blonde,upper class.There was a very interesting article in the daily mail about 10 years ago,Harry went to some miss world show(details are sketchy,dont know where this was)anyway out of a long line of women he chose a black woman to take out for a dance.The comment section picked up on this and said Harry always had a preference for black women and would go on to marry a black woman one day.I found it interesting as this was well before Megs.I still think there is strong enough racist view held in British establishments like the media and royalty that would have never have given her a fair shot.I dont like her but she was never given a fair trial.I'm surprised that this is never picked up on but all the royal women are treated like shit,the media never fawned over the only female child the queen had,Princess Ann..Meghan you never stood a chance.
HaHa...almost 29,000 now!I'm absolutely loving the top comment on the Daily Mail's story about the pregnancy/surrogacy announcement
Top trolling and shade!
If you haven't already, everyone head over there and green arrow it. The sugars are absolutely fuming about it!
View attachment 437098
Rubbish!Harry was a darling of the press when he was with the Cressidas and the Chelsea's.Blonde,upper class.There was a very interesting article in the daily mail about 10 years ago,Harry went to some miss world show(details are sketchy,dont know where this was)anyway out of a long line of women he chose a black woman to take out for a dance.The comment section picked up on this and said Harry always had a preference for black women and would go on to marry a black woman one day.I found it interesting as this was well before Megs.I still think there is strong enough racist view held in British establishments like the media and royalty that would have never have given her a fair shot.I dont like her but she was never given a fair trial.I'm surprised that this is never picked up on but all the royal women are treated like shit,the media never fawned over the only female child the queen had,Princess Ann..Meghan you never stood a chance.
I really liked Meghan when she first came on the scene. I thought she was a breath of fresh air and had high hopes for her bringing about positive change. I watched the wedding and thought it was great. I admired her for walking down the aisle on her own for the first part. I had nothing at all negative to say about her.Harry was a darling of the press when he was with the Cressidas and the Chelsea's.Blonde,upper class.There was a very interesting article in the daily mail about 10 years ago,Harry went to some miss world show(details are sketchy,dont know where this was)anyway out of a long line of women he chose a black woman to take out for a dance.The comment section picked up on this and said Harry always had a preference for black women and would go on to marry a black woman one day.I found it interesting as this was well before Megs.I still think there is strong enough racist view held in British establishments like the media and royalty that would have never have given her a fair shot.I dont like her but she was never given a fair trial.I'm surprised that this is never picked up on but all the royal women are treated like shit,the media never fawned over the only female child the queen had,Princess Ann..Meghan you never stood a chance.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?