TheMiceInTheShed
VIP Member
Before I got caught up in the drama of these threads, I remember seeing stuff on YouTube which speculated that Sprog No1 was H's sperm and possibly M's shrivelled up, dehydrated egg (or possibly surrogate's egg - but deffo H's little swimmers), so was of the Royal bloodline, but wouldn't have been in the line of succession because not "born of the body" (also illegitimate). Sprog No2 was allegedly definitely nowt to do with M, may or may not have been H's, but was again arranged by surrogate. It was speculated that there had been twins but one had been lost.
Speculation also was that Sprog No1 was not neurotypical, and Sprog No2 looked nothing like either H or M, and that these were among the reasons that no photographs were forthcoming (another reason being that charming as they might be (all infants are), they weren't as photogenic as the Walses' children, and M wasn't prepared to present them to the public gaze).
I could believe the last bit.
Speculation also was that Sprog No1 was not neurotypical, and Sprog No2 looked nothing like either H or M, and that these were among the reasons that no photographs were forthcoming (another reason being that charming as they might be (all infants are), they weren't as photogenic as the Walses' children, and M wasn't prepared to present them to the public gaze).
I could believe the last bit.