Thanks
@LadyMuck
Video on the Sussex wedding and royal photographer Arthur Edwards. Arthur is a lovely man, kind and loyal, a RF favourite, knew Harald well and made allowances for him until eventually he had to face the truth and is now free to speak.
Arthur said the Sussex wedding was a miserable affair. Harald was angry, the professional victim Sussexes love-hate relationship with the press very evident. In the carriage the Sussexes turned away from Arthur, which was cruel. Harald was angry because the Ho's true colours were coming out, and he was hearing things he didn't like from his family and friends who were trying to make sure he wasn't making a mistake. He'd heard he was her third husband, not her second, that she'd had a daughter and now couldn't have children.
Above all, that she'd been pregnant, and had lost the baby that morning so it was too late to cancel the wedding. Hence the too-big dress, and the triumph on Doria's and her daughter's faces. Their plan had worked. Plus he'd had an emotional phone-call with his ex Chelsy Davy the night before. The Ho blamed her miscarriage on stress caused by the press, the enemy.
The Sussexes had undergone a marriage ceremony in Botswana. This is why The Queen invited the Ho for Christmas. A stickler for protocol, she invited her only because the Sussexes were legally married - not because she was indulging the Ho. They were married and there was no going back, and the Stoats would now have a proper formal wedding as well.
The whole world has been gaslighted.
........................
Fascinating video, so the rumours about the secret Botswana wedding were likely true. As they say, no smoke.... the Sussexes will have produced some sort of marriage certificate from a Botswana church, and I wonder what religion it was? Maybe Welby was involved in sorting this mess, baptizing her or whatever, and I always wondered what the private meetings they had with him were about. Certainly not "spiritual guidance" as we were told.
Unbelievable in this day and age, and just shows how the strict protocol of the Monarchy allowed the Ho and Snakebite to trap them as surely as the Ho and her mother trapped Harald. A family like the Gettys for example would have demanded proof, and / or cut her and her filthy mother down at a stroke.
---
I am 100% sure that this picture is photoshopped. Here, William looks to be in his late teens/early twenties. And it's a face stuck on top of a collar - no neck. Totally unbelievable.
But...but .....this is GETTY, who killed Catherine's Mother's Day photo along with AfP and PA!
---
Stigma if published???? What's that supposed to mean? Stigma for whom? Haz? The US? The UK? The RF?
And law enforcement records?????
The development comes after a hearing in February in which a think-tank argued that details of the Duke of Sussex's March 2020 visa application should be made public.
www.dailymail.co.uk
.
"Law enforcement records" could mean anything and not about drug use at all. Harald has already admitted drug use in Spare and there's not exactly been much stigma attached to it.
An immigration lawyer said it's "highly unusual" for the word "stigma" to be used n connection with a visa application so it's likely something worse than drugs.
The list of "Law enforcement" bodies that could be involved covers everything including Police, Airport Police, FBI, Secret Services and more.
Harald is a nasty violent man and something is being covered up.