Thanks for posting this. I saw a brief snippet this morning suggesting an imminent announcement but the presenters weren't turning themselves inside out so I assumed it was the usual daily speculation
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Off topic but l don't think l can bear 2 months of electioneering thrust down out throats at every whipstitch
At least it'll give us a bit of a break from 2 months of Harkle PR and/or Catherine-bashing. So there is that.Off topic but l don't think l can bear 2 months of electioneering thrust down out throats at every whipstitch
General election called, woohoo!
The NHS may survive after all! Despite the Tories trying so hard to get rid of it.
Loved the backing track
The NHS may survive after all! Despite the Tories trying so hard to get rid of it.
Loved the backing track
I'm quite enjoying the protestors blasting 'things will only get better' over Rishi lol
Confirmed. GE 4July.
Anything to keep harkles off the front pages
Anything to keep harkles off the front pages
Was this a DEI commission?
www.telegraph.co.uk
Sorry, who is she meant to be? The Princess of Wales? You could have fooled me. Even by the standards of modern royal portraiture (and there have been many abominable likenesses of senior members of our royal family produced over the past century), Tatler’s new cover image – an “exclusive” portrait of the Princess of Wales by the British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – is egregiously, intolerably, jaw-hits-the-floor bad.
Whatever you made of Jonathan Yeo’s recently unveiled crimson portrait of King Charles III – which, as various wags observed, looked as if it had come pre-attacked with tomato soup by Just Stop Oil protesters – at least the damn thing resembled its subject.
But this? I’ve spent the past hour or so – time, incidentally, that I will never get back – scrutinising Uzor’s “likeness”, and, still, I cannot divine any flicker of resemblance between it and the woman it’s supposed to depict. At first, my editor thought it was meant to represent Meghan, Duchess of Sussex; its subject’s smirk made me think, initially, of Anne Robinson fronting The Weakest Link.
Tatler’s Princess of Wales portrait is intolerably bad
Tatler’s new cover image – an ‘exclusive’ painting by British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – shows no flicker of resemblance to its subject
Sorry, who is she meant to be? The Princess of Wales? You could have fooled me. Even by the standards of modern royal portraiture (and there have been many abominable likenesses of senior members of our royal family produced over the past century), Tatler’s new cover image – an “exclusive” portrait of the Princess of Wales by the British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – is egregiously, intolerably, jaw-hits-the-floor bad.
Whatever you made of Jonathan Yeo’s recently unveiled crimson portrait of King Charles III – which, as various wags observed, looked as if it had come pre-attacked with tomato soup by Just Stop Oil protesters – at least the damn thing resembled its subject.
But this? I’ve spent the past hour or so – time, incidentally, that I will never get back – scrutinising Uzor’s “likeness”, and, still, I cannot divine any flicker of resemblance between it and the woman it’s supposed to depict. At first, my editor thought it was meant to represent Meghan, Duchess of Sussex; its subject’s smirk made me think, initially, of Anne Robinson fronting The Weakest Link.
Rishi is getting grey super quick .
I am a tad worried about Labour getting .in because if they run the country like they run My town it will be a complete shitshow They have had overall control of the town council for two years the town is a mess shops closing pot holes everywhere and we are nearly bankrupt .
He really is a prick
I was wondering where British Zambia is?Was this a DEI commission?
Tatler’s Princess of Wales portrait is intolerably bad
Tatler’s new cover image – an ‘exclusive’ painting by British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – shows no flicker of resemblance to its subject
Sorry, who is she meant to be? The Princess of Wales? You could have fooled me. Even by the standards of modern royal portraiture (and there have been many abominable likenesses of senior members of our royal family produced over the past century), Tatler’s new cover image – an “exclusive” portrait of the Princess of Wales by the British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – is egregiously, intolerably, jaw-hits-the-floor bad.
Whatever you made of Jonathan Yeo’s recently unveiled crimson portrait of King Charles III – which, as various wags observed, looked as if it had come pre-attacked with tomato soup by Just Stop Oil protesters – at least the damn thing resembled its subject.
But this? I’ve spent the past hour or so – time, incidentally, that I will never get back – scrutinising Uzor’s “likeness”, and, still, I cannot divine any flicker of resemblance between it and the woman it’s supposed to depict. At first, my editor thought it was meant to represent Meghan, Duchess of Sussex; its subject’s smirk made me think, initially, of Anne Robinson fronting The Weakest Link.
It's probably Clitheroe way...
I think it's the same everywhere, we're in a tory stronghold and it's the worst it's ever been.
On the royal family threads, there are paintings of various royals, that made me cry laughing when I found them.Was this a DEI commission?
Tatler’s Princess of Wales portrait is intolerably bad
Tatler’s new cover image – an ‘exclusive’ painting by British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – shows no flicker of resemblance to its subject
Sorry, who is she meant to be? The Princess of Wales? You could have fooled me. Even by the standards of modern royal portraiture (and there have been many abominable likenesses of senior members of our royal family produced over the past century), Tatler’s new cover image – an “exclusive” portrait of the Princess of Wales by the British-Zambian artist Hannah Uzor – is egregiously, intolerably, jaw-hits-the-floor bad.
Whatever you made of Jonathan Yeo’s recently unveiled crimson portrait of King Charles III – which, as various wags observed, looked as if it had come pre-attacked with tomato soup by Just Stop Oil protesters – at least the damn thing resembled its subject.
But this? I’ve spent the past hour or so – time, incidentally, that I will never get back – scrutinising Uzor’s “likeness”, and, still, I cannot divine any flicker of resemblance between it and the woman it’s supposed to depict. At first, my editor thought it was meant to represent Meghan, Duchess of Sussex; its subject’s smirk made me think, initially, of Anne Robinson fronting The Weakest Link.
They are so bad, and the comments are priceless.
This story is a complete lie.
Kate did try to help, she bought him a new dog bowl.
Good for her! I hope she just completely ignores him for the rest of time. Imagine him thinking he could count on her to help after what he's said. If this is true, he's beyond delusional!
Same in my town, Lib Dems got in and it's a mess. They did manage to paint the town lampposts in rainbow colours - yay - that couldn't be better spent elsewhere could it.
---
The woman who stepped back so he could talk to his brother after a funeral? Didn't help at all. No way was she saying anything that could be twisted against her by the recorded calls. If there were any.
Thanks @wibble
Neil seems to be taking this Nigerian ancestry story seriously in that the Ho's not managed to provide any proof. He says the Nigerians are willing to help Snakebite trace her ancestry too, as surely she must be Nigerian? Because of this Snakebite ducked out of the trip as she was supposed to come along with the Flatpacks.
What a load of rubbish.
Her artwork is rubbish. I could print a better picture of Kate.
Another person benefitting from DEI at the expense of more talented artists
I doubt that even happened but he has definitely burnt his boats there.
I imagine Catherine didn't speak a word to either of that pair when they were over for the queen's funeral. We saw the looks she gave them, at the walkabout and rightly so.
Also Meghan tried to touch her sleeve or something along those lines, as they got into the pew at the service. Shudder.
And then her being named as one of the 'racists'
by plastic face, in his book. Ugh.- Status