Appropriate for a yacht girl!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Or some part of Marcus Anderson's anatomy.It may be her minge
IMDb didn’t have this picture for Rachel. They do now.
anything to do with surrogacy and the Harkles, I keep in mind how close they were at this time to Elton and his husband. Remember the flying away to the South of France rather than Balmoral that August when pregnant with Archie after the passports had been "stolen" ahead of that other trip to New York for the baby shower - ha ha, her stories have so many holes.
We know Elton is very experienced with injunctions and also with surrogates. I expect also being friends with Amal (invited to the baby shower at that time) would have come in handy. Celebs with "open" secrets that are reported on but not officially reported were invited to the wedding - Amal, Elton, Oprah, Beckhams etc. The Queen as you say wouldn't have needed an injunction - just maybe steer the press away from a subject is what we assume, but we know ole Megz (the legal whizz from Suits) would have sprung into injunction mode and told the RF to stuff their advice.
So I think plans for hiding a surrogacy could easily have been discussed with maybe uncle Elton or someone else ahead of the announced pregnancy.
We know injunctions happen in the middle of the night and Judges get woken in the night so they don't need much planning, they just happen.
I'd imagine that unpleasant Jenny Afia and team could have already been available on speed dial to the Harkles at that time via Elton and his mates. Any number of privacy solicitors would be willing to spring into action.
It was on Elton's holidays that he'd also invited the celeb's barrister at the same time as Harry and they had their chat/influence over the dimwit Harry. This appears to be where the imaginary idea that Harry had simply been "unaware" previously of the phone hacking/claims while he was in the army and that William had definitely never made Harry aware of phone hacking prior to that. This meaning Harry could now proceed with a case along with those celebs giving maximum publicity. So scratch Elton's mates backs and some back scratching from many numerous contacts in the privacy law teams are available.
As we know, these injunctions happen immediately, so it wouldn't need any preparation, just instructing the legals get to work. A phone call from the Harkles is as much effort as would be needed from them. We know they love chatting to legal teams.
I expect the Harkles are very capable of setting this up at a moment's notice via Elton or Amal or.... and I don't think the RF would be involved in saying don't report on this. I think it's the Harkles and one of the other surrogate celebs that has given them all the contacts for keeping it out of the press.
Last edited:
She wanted to be top dog or nothing, and had no idea how anything worked despite looking at photos of bearskins. She and Harold are dangerous, and wanted the loot and prestige without toeing the line, and they've got that but want more. The lack of children will keep her away forever, not necessarily Harold.
Like Kim J.Un is a psychopath and predator she is too. We can't believe how merciless she is, but I think that the hard drugs Snakebite was using while pregnant resulted in a damaged Ho brain as well as her odd uncoordinated body, inability to relate to any living thing, the feral way she eats and the underbite, the carrion crow walk and colour-blindness. How children and animals sense the coldness drifting off her like vapour from ice and shrink back. She couldn't possibly be married to an animal-lover, and she isn't.
They'd have never fitted into the rigid hierarchy of the Monarchy and never intended to. Doesn't Tom M Jnr look seedy!
Why was she always holding her bump
And how can she walk in those heels
I was never with out my 5 inch heels till I was pregnant when I could not walk or stand in them
Or kneel down with my legs together towards the end kneeling was impossible
She obviously never searched being pregnant
more like she's said "duck it. Life's too short - do what you want (and she wouldn't be blamed for saying "but do it without me") if indeed she has given in.
Kate Middleton gives in to King Charles, Prince William plans about Harry
Kate Middleton, who's getting stronger after undergoing 'preventative Chemotherapy' following cancer diagnosis, has made a big sacrifice to save the monarchy.The Princess of Wales has reportedly...www.thenews.com.pk
I don't believe this. As if Catherine hasn't got enough to deal with.
A comprehensive look at all things bump
Rubbish!
That witch took photos of her sleeping daughter. Made her daughter cry and dressed her in an ill fitting bridesmaids dress. Called her children feral.
Do you really think she’s going to welcome her back?
you can forgive a lot of things, but not if it affects your children
That’s such a tit article, the Harkles aren’t coming back , it simply isn’t going to happen and if by some act of lucifer they did, that would signal the end of the monarchy.
Check out this guy's commentary on Smeg scenes. This one where she obviously didn't want to be with Catherine at Wimbledon
I'm in a different foxhole right now. But have we seen this? Wtf is this Jacquellyn King? That's an alternative name for the sea going skank?
One of Harry’s over inflated ballsIt may be her minge
Am sure she keeps his balls in her purse, they were probably pretty small, like his todger!
I think if you re-read my original post, you might see that at no point did I intimate she was going to welcome anyone. Exactly the opposite in fact. I was trying to express that she would throw up her hands and say enough.
I will refrain from telling you that I think your post was rubbish.
Now, I think she was constantly holding the bump to keep it in situ and prevent it from falling down.
Years ago, when I was teaching communications, including non-verbal communications, to business students I was intrigued to learn that the vulnerable inner wrist exposure gesture smegs is using there signifies submission and 'come hither' to the object of her interest. Not only is she signalling her availability, she's also grooming herself (a vestigial attempt at making herself more presentable to the object of desire).
Watch any woman with a man she's sexually interested in, guaranteed she'll signal in this way quite frequently. Restaurants are good places to observe these sort of gestures.
In other words, this photo shows a woman who is a lying, cheating, bleeping tart.
It looks like a piece of boiling ham, or ham hock. It's not rubbery or plastic ....nicked from the butcher's stall at the market for a Date Nite Dinner with Harald?
Thanks for your reply.
I understand what you're saying about the surrogacy, and that Elton could be involved so the Stoats could carry this off themselves, but it's far more in the Monarchy's interest to suppress reporting on the Flatpacks, and this is a constitutional matter far bigger than Elton. No response to questions about the fake christening or why they're in the Line of Succession. These are the important points, not surrogacy.
Plus there's all the other reporting suppression over the last 5 years, dodgy birth notice outside BP which can only be from the Palace. Basically the suppression of ALL negative reporting about the Sussexes, so I can't see it being down to anyone but the Palace.
The bottom line is that the King has put two frauds in the Line of Succession, surrogates or not, and all the rest is gaslighting. This is what needs to be sorted out and they need to be removed, and they can't retrospectively change the law, as it stands as it was at the time. A big mistake and now a big problem.
Exactly. He'll publish in his book about putting cream on his todger and thinking of his mummy, but not a single plausible anecdote about their kids, the birth etc. It does not make sense that they would be so open and descriptive about old hurty feelings and todgers but nothing about their current life.
- Status