I'm sure Doria looks at Harry like that....
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Reply to @TickTickTick 's post below, sorry it's not a joke. It's all over the internet, is very murky and I only posted a bit of it. The point was in connection with the tweet about someone "close to the Stoat" we were wondering about, if this could be the link to the surrogacy. It rang a bell as there was a scandal.
"WHAT the Fluffing Fluff!!!!!? (Trying out swearing in YouTube dog-swear) Cinnie, is this a joke??!!! It is repulsive.
Also, just goes to show, always avoid things boasting about "wellness". Here in NZ it means Forget about Healthcare, you didn't work hard enough to be "well".
---
"WHAT the Fluffing Fluff!!!!!? (Trying out swearing in YouTube dog-swear) Cinnie, is this a joke??!!! It is repulsive.
Also, just goes to show, always avoid things boasting about "wellness". Here in NZ it means Forget about Healthcare, you didn't work hard enough to be "well".
---
As I recall, if it's any consolation, education has always tended to the left. There have always been loony lefty lecturers pushing their own ideologies.
I well remember it when I was at uni, yonks ago.
The leftists have had some significant advances. But their victories have only laid bare the sheer impracticality and idiot ineffectiveness of their policies.
The pendulum will swing back at some point.
It's been removed by the uploader.
It's partly that it's decision making by committee, and people who do well on committees tend to be those with too much time on their hands.
And as Oscar said, "the trouble with socialism is it takes too many evenings."
Pov. M's injunction on British media ends
Doxxing is when people try to find out who's behind anonymous accounts on the Internet and then threaten to expose them. Sometimes they report people to their employers or post pictures of their children and let others know where someone lives to intimidate them:Jesus raises some very valid points here!
I also came to ask who Natasha is - am confused as the replies don't include the original post! Are we saying that it's Taz?
Also, what is Doxxing? I know I could Google it, and probably will now, but I really hate all these new terms! Why can't people speak properly and say what they mean?! Am I alone in this?
I Googled 'what does IlBW mean' the other day, and stumbled upon a Reddit post with a list of abbreviations in relation to the Royal Family. What a revelation that was! Maybe we should have it pinned to the top for all the newer members like me
"search for and publish private or identifying information about (a particular individual) on the internet, typically with malicious intent.
"hackers and online vigilantes routinely dox both public and private figures"
Thanks @LadyMuck []
Neil Sean reported that allegedly some Easter Eggs hsve been reduced from £10 pounds to 62p.
Stephen Colbert of CBS gave the Stoat a platform to promote Spare.
CBS are hoping that Colbert's half-apology will draw the line under this matter, but execs are worried at the high backlash about Colbert's attack on the Waleses and are furious at how this has played out.
If the Waleses return to the States, this could impact on any access given to CBS.
Comedian Colbert's half-apology wasn't funny, he's not laughing now and may be forced to issue a proper apology. This is a developing story as ever.
Correct. You are spot on, and this is the nub of what I believe still threatens to become a existential constitutional crisis. I don't think you have to be a raving conspiracy theorist to recognise that:So if the markle children are born from surrogates it's ILLEGAL they've been put in the LoS and we are boldly being deceived in plain sight.
1. As a matter of law, the succession is determined by Parliament by statute, and in turn Parliament must act with the consent of the people. It would be aq. Least of all is it a matter for casual variation by the monarchy.
Good point
Perhaps that was the plan.
The end of primogeniture (males first) in the LOS had to be approved by the Commonwealth too. Assuming that would be true with allowing surrogate children in the LOS and tbh some of the Commonwealth countries may be too conservative with a small c to approve that imho. Also as mentioned above these things never apply in retrospect.
Sorry - posted this before my rant was exhausted!
2. Having acknowledged the flatpacks and included them in the line of succession, the only comfort Charles can take is that NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER IS PERMITTED TO EMERGE that they were anything other than born of the body.
3. We can see for ourselves that strange goings-on have been tolerated, which would appear to serve the purpose of ensuring that no evidence whatsoever is permitted to emerge of surrogacy etc.
4. It would only take Smegma's confirmation that she did indeed have a hysterectomy when she was 28, or that in some other way the flatpacks were not born of the body, for the whole miserable house of cards to come tumbling down. I doubt she'd do that just to clear up any confusion ("never give the milk away for free") - but she might be tempted not to implicate Charlie boy if indulged ad nauseam.
I remember posting a little while ago about Hansard, the debate confirming that LoS children need to be born of the body by law. Fark is mentioned but not Legless in Hsnsard.So if the markle children are born from surrogates it's ILLEGAL they've been put in the LoS and we are boldly being deceived in plain sight.
I tried for ages to find anything relating to amending the Line of Succession, but found nothing and didn't know where to look as was completely out of my depth.
Apparently a Private Members Bill is brought and put before Parliament, is debated and If accepted gets Royal assent for the LoS to be amended. We've no idea when this was done for the Flatpacks or who brought the Bill, as the Flatpacks suddenly appeared in the LoS on 23rd March 2023 so it must have had Royal assent.
The idea of the Flatpacks blindsiding Chuck and seizing the titles is ridiculous. They can call themselves whatever they want in the States, Prince Flatpack or whatever, but until this is ratified in Parliament and has the Monarch's seal it's meaningless. The press made out that the RF couldn't do anything about it, they were taken by surprise but this is damage limitation. The Ho made clear long ago she wanted the titles and was going to get them and the Monarch obliged.
Remember that baby doctor who delivered "Harry's daughter"?
The one who closed down her clinic at short notice and abandoning several expectant mothers.
Any further info on where she is and why she shut up shop almost overnight?
The one who closed down her clinic at short notice and abandoning several expectant mothers.
Any further info on where she is and why she shut up shop almost overnight?
Her husband was in a similar field too I think? Very odd to have left all of their upcoming patients in the lurch.
---
This is the Mail article.
Meghan Markle's obstetrician who helped deliver Lilibet shuts practice
Dr Melissa Drake made the announcement on Instagram, where she said it had been 'the honor of my life to work with the women of Santa Barbara' before announcing a 'leave of absence' from June 30.
www.dailymail.co.uk
Ok, have watched POV's video, and I can see Lady C has her latest, with 'Surrogacy' in the title. Am going in!
POV said the Palace want to release a statement before anything emerges, maybe this is the Twitter chatter?
POV said the Palace want to release a statement before anything emerges, maybe this is the Twitter chatter?
Apparently, TM Jrs YT vid is now gone! Wonder if the Gruesome’s forced that to happen? 
For those who haven't watched POV's video, here is the transcript.
---
---
If you see what POV said, someone called in to claim that smeg took out an injunction against the press. I wonder if this is the reason the video was pulled?Apparently, TM Jrs YT vid is now gone! Wonder if the Gruesome’s forced that to happen?
View attachment 2860014
Attachments
- Status