Harry & Meghan #433 Meghan Serves Other People's Children Up On A Silver Platter

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I think she faked a pregnancy when she showed up at the Inskip wedding.
I think she faked a miscarriage (maybe more than one) along the line.

I think the Queen was wary of her and wanted to advise a long engagement to see how she behaved long term but then I think a fake pregnancy made them arrange the wedding (and move Eugenie's to a later date.)

I also think the Queen had guilt and regret about not letting her sister marry Townsend or Charles marry Camilla or Andrew marry Koo Stark. And this made her take her eye off the ball and let Meghan in because she didnt want to deprive Harry of the love of his life like she had with the other three.
In hindsight she should have allowed the other three marriages and should have forbidden Harry to marry Meghan and should have written Meghan a large cheque to walk away from Harry.
---




thankyou.


PS-
Bookworm is South African.
I think that's a really good point. TLQ was looking at a variety of disastrous decisions marriage wise and thought she was doing the best thing. We're stuck quoting Monty Python 'No one expects the Spanish Inquisition'.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 32
Even if they change the rules so that surrogate children are seen a legitimate not adopted would it be not retrospective?

A bit like when PoW was first pregnant and they changed the rules so a female child would stay in their position. If it were retrospective Princess Anne and her children would now be above Prince Andrew and his. Much as we may like that it never happened.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 34
I think she faked a pregnancy when she showed up at the Inskip wedding.
I think she faked a miscarriage (maybe more than one) along the line.

I think the Queen was wary of her and wanted to advise a long engagement to see how she behaved long term but then I think a fake pregnancy made them arrange the wedding (and move Eugenie's to a later date.)

I also think the Queen had guilt and regret about not letting her sister marry Townsend or Charles marry Camilla or Andrew marry Koo Stark. And this made her take her eye off the ball and let Meghan in because she didnt want to deprive Harry of the love of his life like she had with the other three.
In hindsight she should have allowed the other three marriages and should have forbidden Harry to marry Meghan and should have written Meghan a large cheque to walk away from Harry.
---




thankyou.


PS-
Bookworm is South African.
The miscarriage story appears to come into being when the case against the Mail begins to unravel.
And is then used to make the claim that it is the Mail's fault for putting her through the stress of the court case that she miscarried.

We'll ignore for now that it was il Duce that brought the case.

Though I suspect that the judge was taken in by it, and it may have played a part in the ruling.

And without checking, were they in Oxfordshire at the time of the supposed occurrence?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 29
Random thought that came into my head just now: Harry gives me the ick so much, yet his brother William is dashing and lovely. I'd say yes to one and helllllll no to the other. I just can't imagine anyone wanting to cozy up to Haz, he always looks like he smells of stale sweat and booze, dishevelled, selfish etc. There's no way Meghan was actually attracted to him. Just his $$$ and fame.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 45
Just his $$$ and fame.
She's not the first and won't be the last. Zero self-respect. Must be amazing to have no shame nor dignity. My ex (long after we split) decided to find the richest man she could to marry. She found one and seems to be happy as larry, living the high-life and swanning-around like lady muck. As I say, it must be bleeping amazing to just do that and not feel any shame. Incredible.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
Reactions: 27
Just saying...

The Royal Grift video mentions the visa, and makes links to Harry being involved with NATO.
The implication - assumption - is that it is the British government doing whatever....

However....
Il Duce is known to be friends with the Trudeaus, had lived in Canada, Canada is a NATO member, and is actively involved in the "censorship complex".
So if there is a diplomatic visa, perhaps it isn't supplied by Britain.
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 31
Go to 56 57 minutes, or there abouts


---
Wow, just listened to the video from the 56 57 minute mark, and wow, wow wow, hope this is true. Said H was supposed to come out with it last Oct, and M wouldn't be in it.
What did this show as I think it's gone now 😬
 
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 16
I loved San Francisco about 25 years ago. Now it is a crime ridden, poorly policed, poop filled homeless encampment with rampant drug use. It is not a safe place to be. Another once majestic city destroyed by left wing politics.
Yes, same as London with gangs of feral youths and girls storming Budgens supermarkets. Sadiq Khan is an absolute disgrace, a hollow-eyed corrupt grey dwarf clinging to power, and that cruel Kanye if he was white would be arrested for spousal abuse.
Lady Muck posted a video the other day from Neil Sean warning us of pickpockets in London, as it's the second time his phone was stolen - from a zipped pocket. He said to be careful.
There's no respect for the police. I'm in Spain at the moment and the police take no prisoners, they are respected and feared. They've hugely tightened up their borders here and throw people out, unlike us at home who allow hordes of pickpockets and illegal people into our country. This is the reality of daily life for the man on the ground, no matter how the elite preach to us. A machete attack is statistically unlikely to happen to a person, but the fear is there and they never used to happen before.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Angry
Reactions: 46
So if the markle children are born from surrogates it's ILLEGAL they've been put in the LoS and we are boldly being deceived in plain sight. :mad:
Indeed....
But then when the Harkles scam was being pulled there wasn't an outbreak of cancer....

If you want to get really conspiratorial, you might ask why the Harkles avoided so many family gatherings.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 27
I agree! I think the whole Markle clan are bloody rough, and as sleazy as hell.

TM Sr's gruff but well-meaning, sick-old-man image has never washed with me. A couple of posters upthread mentioned that he was absolutely fine with Dorito using the marital home - where the young Meghan lived remember! - to shag both sexes indiscriminately, and display the home-made porn photos around the home. Didn't TM Sr (according to TM Jr, so perhaps a pinch of salt is needed) regularly visit the Far East as a - let's not beat about the bush - sex tourist, and invite TM Jr along too?

Before I retired, I sometimes wondered what the hell it would take for Child Protection colleagues to remove a child from its 'parents'. They'd go to any lengths to keep the family unit together even when the so-called parent/s were IMO lost causes. However one of the few things that would get their arses in gear and carry out an emergency removal was a minor witnessing or being aware of adults (even the parents) having overt sexual relations. I can't imagine the US is so very different, but I guess the Markle household was off their radar.

The Ragland side of the family appear to be decent enough folk with the obvs exception of Dorito.
If TM Snr turned a blind eye to DR shagging and MM knew it's no wonder MM allegedly uses Sex to grift... Children see as children do.
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 33
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.