Cinnamon.girl
VIP Member
Thanks @LadyMuckNeil Sean
![Wine glass :wine_glass: 🍷](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f377.png)
Neil's source says that the Ho's exclusion from the Sandringham Summit, which led to Megxit, was something the Ho never forgave the Palace for. She wanted to add her input by zoom or whatever (from Canada presumably) but she wasn't allowed and Harald was left to deal with it alone. This in turn led in the Ho's eyes to an unsatisfactory result regarding what was agreed at Sandringham between the Palace and the Sussexes.
...................
This is interesting because it supports the Stoat's claim that they were told to leave the RF rather than the Palace version that they left of their own accord. It seems the Ho was removed from the UK before the meeting and escorted to Canada, as no way would she have wanted to miss this crucial meeting to thrash out a deal with BP.
This also explains Harald's angry phone calls to her as he didn't know what to do.
Something happened to get them thrown out, but HM wanted to clarify things before the Stoat left too and this was done at Sandringham.
A PR release then said they'd "decided to step back as senior working Royals", but it seems that as Harald has always said, they were told to leave. Whatever happened to cause this, the Stoats have never forgiven the Palace.
This is just my take on Neil's video, picking up the fact if true that the Ho wanted to be at the Sandringham meeting, and the significance of her not being allowed to be there. It casts a different light on everything. Since Megxit the story has been that the Stoats chose to leave, their choice, so why are they complaining, they stepped back etc.?
Maybe they didn't, or weren't ready to go yet even if this was their intention.
Or they were thrown out but it was packaged as something else, and it's bitten the RF on the bum ever since.