Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

peradetlic

VIP Member
Andrew?
The one that sued and won against People over long lens photographs taken of Bea and Eugenie in a rubber pool?
Was offering his children to...pedophiles?

Well, you know that William is Satan right.(well sources )
Also a Jew married to a Jew right...aren't we...all?

Really it 's in a book.
They are all..whatever is alleged that they are doing.
But of course it's all possible .
Bib

Exhibit no 1.: "little" Willy in his pants

:LOL::love::LOL:😂
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 15

hehehe

VIP Member
I'm very sorry to hear that @Ndrangheta. There are more of them around than is comfortable for us to think about.

Before retirement, I used to commute to / from London on the trains and underground. I sometimes, in my darker moments, used to muse on the number - of the many hundreds on the crowded train/tube/platform - of murderers, child abusers, rapists, wife / husband beaters, socio/psychopaths that were amongst us. According to the laws of averages and the relevant statistics, there ought to have been a sizeable number that ticked one (or more!) of those boxes.

Just to say, I don't usually think along these lines - I'm quite normal really! - it's only when I'm in a large crowd. Everyone appears so ordinary until we know them better, don't they? (Though I've often read that unfortunate Tattlers who've had their lives blighted by narcissists have come to have an in-built radar, and can spot a narc e.g. Smegs, a mile off.)

Speaking of people looking ordinary until we know otherwise...
When I was working, I was helping a colleague who worked in Child Protection with the techy stuff around some training she was due to give. I got to see the material she'd prepared, and one of the things she was planning was to give participants several screens-worth of photographs of people. There were around 50 of them and they were just ordinary photos, and not mugshots. The participants would then be asked to decide which, if any, had been convicted of child SA. The only info about the people apart from their photos was age and occupation (if any). There were both males and females, and a huge range of ages, ethnicities, and professions, e.g. student, housewife, unemployed, dentist, printer, translator, and so on.

Of course I perused the pictures, and said to her, "Go on then, tell me which ones?" guessing that there would be a few surprises. I was still taken aback by her answer. "All of them."
No shade, but your post is way off topic for this thread and I have reported it. There are crime threads elsewhere to post this, which people who want to avoid this stuff safely can stay away from. I didn't come into a Harry and Meghan thread for posts on child SA -- this is something that can be quite psychologically damaging for some to see, even briefly without reading the full post, and then have to think about it indefinitely.

I get there are posters here who get along with each other but this isn't a free for all/random thoughts/ socialising thread as it's increasingly becoming with page after page of off topic content which makes the H&M posts hard to find.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 14

peradetlic

VIP Member
Why wouldn't Epstein , Weinstein and Ghislaine be guests at a party in 2006?
The article implies that Jeff was aware that the FBI was after him?
So he decided to party ? And leave evidence for the FBI because jail...is fun?
Not on that subject, but on young royal offered
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 13

TheCutiePatootie

VIP Member
The thing that gets me is that if she was 17, where were her parents? What was she doing with JE. If a 17 year old commits a crime, the judge can decide that the 17 year old be tried as an adult. The same goes for her. I knew damn well what I was doing when I was 17. 17 is old enough to know better. She wanted to be there and should be held accountable.
---

It is also hard for a man to tell the difference between a 17 vs 18 year old. girls lie all the time about their age.

Are you saying 17-year-olds are too old to be abused?

Sorry for being obtuse. I just need to understand the first sentence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12