Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.

jkroche95

VIP Member
The little girl next to him doesn’t seem too impressed either …. and her outfit is hideous as well. I wonder if the bride had a falling out with her future sister-in-law about them?😂
apparently it's Eleanor Fellowes, Jane's (Spencer) daughter!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

Shushex

VIP Member
_________

Oo what's this

Astralian 60 mins?

BTW: i'm having trouble seeing Twitter links, is any one having the same problem?

BTW 2: is Lady C trans or intersex? found it on a sugar account and checked it, and she was assigned male at birth but claims she was female had a "deformity" which makes me think intersex. nice way to be inclusive and tolerant, sugars, especially during Pride Month.

edit: twitter is working now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

Hannahebee

VIP Member
Just googled that. Is it good?
I enjoy a murder mystery
I have to say it's interesting in a way as there are multiple suspects who are each hiding the truth from Inspector Ravenscroft but it leaves you guessing as to why they are keeping secrets from him in the first place. A murder mystery author who I would personally recommend is Helena Dixon as her murder mysteries are so interesting that you don't want to put the book down as you always want to see what happens next, the character are well rounded which results in you learning more about them in each book and the locations in which the stories take place in are really interesting; for example in one of the stories the murder takes place at a beauty pageant.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 18

Onthehop

VIP Member
I think this is what BookWorm means. I don't know if there are different versions of birth certificates, but this one for Ffark hasn't been completed properly by the look of it because there's a space and it's got a line through it.
Maybe someone savvy can shed some light.

(““maiden surname”, in relation to a woman means the surname under which she contracted her marriage (or, where she has married more than once, her first marriage),”

This Birth certificate should show the maiden name plus any other married names, here
Engelson because that was her name when she married the Stoat.

This certificate from Harper's Bazaar shows that where it says "surname at marriage if different to maiden name:, there's a line through it and nothing written. This should have Engelson. Why has it been omitted? From this, it was her first marriage but it was possibly her third.

In the section where it says that you "certify the above particulars are true", etc., there is no signature, just the typed word "Harry". No surname, meaningless.

View attachment 2235702
Would her occupation be described as “princess of the UK”??
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Angry
Reactions: 18

Cat Eyez

VIP Member
Today is the day we find out if H's visa is released
What do you think they'll do?

I do wonder if a week has been granted so it can be doctored - I'm such a cynic, trust no one 🙄

Can it it be doctored to show favourable toward those it needs too?
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Wow
Reactions: 18

Evangelina

VIP Member
@Evangelina

i stand corrected.
it's stupid of me to assume that every one hacked is just an uneducated user of new technologies, although i will stand by that it might have been the case in some of the minor celebs.
i delved deeper into the issue and, as you say, the voice message inbox "hacking" is the tip of the iceberg that the press begrudgingly admitted to, so not to open the nuclear cans of worms consisting of, to put it bluntly, committing high treason: because all this listening in and planting of bugs and deploying high end military intelligence tier spying equipment IS treason. and for what? a first scoop about which plane will Chelsy be boarding (or so they would like us to believe?) that Murdock really got off scot free, the investigation should have gone much deeper, or maybe it didn't because it would have revealed too many state secrets (am talking of the spying on cabinet ministers here, involved in two never ending illegal wars; no one have no time for Chas' tampon fetishes)

i'll mention again my favourite Ripper theory: he is a Fleet Street creation.
------

i finished the Palace Papers and i must say it ended on a disgusting downer. Tina Brown keeps invoking the Camilla test in relation to Charles' hiring policies, while epically failing the Meghan test herself: she was so deep up Smegz and Sparry's arse she could tickle their tonsils with her saccharine tongue. the amount of contorsionism and mental gymnastics she did to excuse and explain away all their proven lies makes Scrotie Scobie cringe in shame. And, while every one loves to mock Charles, you must admit that he does have some good traits. Not our Tina! she won't be caught alive saying anything remotely positive about Chas: the only good thing she said, through gritted bared canines, was how gracious he was to escort "sweet Doria" at the wedding. then she went on to shit on his appearance (not so body positive, doncher think? oh, i forgot, he's male, pale-well...- and stale, so his "dumbo ears" are fair game).
otherwise, the book is a page turner, easy to go through and have a laugh, but you might need to up your insulin once you get to the Smeg chapters. let's say it was written for the Vanity Fair US audience.

now back to our usual program:
We debatted here, mercilesly mocked Harry over not remembering things from 10-20 years before.
So History 101.
During a press session in Mayfair Murdoch was asked ''who he wants to save '' from those about to fired/punished over the scandal, he pointed at Rehabber Kooks and said ''This one .''
He was in the stand 8 days later , unable to remember meeting her, and got away with it.

As for Tina Brown:
She copy-pasted Morton's ''established narratives'' and Kelley and inserted Harkles to maintain the ''target audience''(US/Diana) view.

Example predating all current events:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

ChaoticArtist

VIP Member
With reference to the bottom advert, how did you get the ability to close it back? Mine has disappeared and just now a massive grey box takes up a lot of my screen. On topic, this would be great if it blotted out Sparry and the ILBW but sadly it isn’t that clever.
The clicky go away went away again 😔 I could suddenly close the ad a few hours ago, but now it's back and not going away, like Annabelle, or the Gruesomes.

Oh hey look it's Sparry with some hair!




@Zippy2000 😱😱 hope you're feeling better now! Did they say what caused such a massive spike? Stress is a big factor too in causing such spikes, so hope you are relaxing and sending all your worried towards the Gruesomes - they can do with some. Just saw your post about taking a break - great idea, get some rest and come back to us all single vision and normal everything 💕♥🤗

@Piglet&Pooh, I hope you can get your surgery soon! Good luck! 💕


ok, so the bike shop owner has found a way to grift from the grifters. Shop owner wrote
”…many of our supporters to reach out to us to ask how they can donate to support this cause, and also how they can support our small business. This got me thinking. Why stop with one bike? Let’s give as many bikes as we can to as many kids as we can, in honor of the birthday boy!…”. Ok, so they set up a go fund me so the Duchess Grifter’s fans can contribute to the shop. Who in turn will send out bikes. But as sided, the $ will go for the cause, and to duppirt the shop. I see a bug Payday for the bike store. Maybe that’s why they sent the bike on the first place.
‘don’t think poorly of me for not believing this. Whole thing was a scam.
I hope Rachel is pissed. Those contributors are for Madame, not some bike shop by extension. I hope a bunch of places start doing this totem. Let’s get a Doll maker to send a gift for little Invisabet, and a Go fund me for dolls for all the little kids. This could be a new Cottage Industry.
I hope Rachel’s not part if this. If anyone else has their hand in Rachel’s fans pockets.
‘why do you think they’re called Supporters?

sorry if this has been said already. Just woke up And I’m behind. I’m worried @Nuttynana has been kinda subdued lately, :( I need more colorful spurts of curse words. @Nuttynana shows Eloquence in calling the bitch a ho.
Thank you to @DanDanTheIceCreamMan for the great new thread, and to @jonathanlynch for the witty title!
Tattlers are awesome! <3
Oh good. Grifter grifting off a grifter. That's karma a bit different from how we recognise it. It would have ticked Smegs off no end though, which serves the purpose.


This is exactly why I don't 'contribute a single rupee' at big shopping outlets - those big companies get tax benefits and goodwill for CSR spending, much of which they fund by asking, or rather forcing, cheating (they'll charge without asking) or shaming, customers to contribute.

And then there are those 'philanthropists'. I unfortunately know some rich men's wives (who contribute zilch to the finances or their husbands' work apart from the occasional networking, if that), who do charideeeee. By forcing their household staff and husbands' office employees, or even artists etc to provide extra unpaid labour, collect money (fund-raise, but tacky) or convince people to contribute in kind, then take all the credit and tax benefits.

The lockdowns showed the true colours of many - one woman got lots of people to contribute foodstuff, got her staff working overtime to prepare maybe one/tenth of it, posed for pictures and videos making up a single package, then sent her driver out to deliver the packages - to families living in mansions, not even old people living alone. The DIL of one of the richest families in the city. Her only contribution was rolling up one chapatti for photos, and 'organising everything'. Where did the rest of the foodstuff and money go?

Another very wealthy woman who found out that her friend was preparing packages every day (they had a farm so weren't as restricted in terms of what they could gather to contribute) sent her driver to collect packets 'for distribution to the poor' in her area - this was in the days when a pass was required and the authorities were very strict. Those 'poor' included her and her staff only. She had a thriving farm of her own, sold her produce at multiple times the market rate in those days. And everyone in their group was thinking that she was so amazing giving away her own harvests and going out to distribute even more, and they sent her more money to help! 🤦
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Angry
Reactions: 18

Just_me1954

VIP Member
Off Topic Don't know how to do it properly.
I'm going to something called a gender reveal on sunday when I should be taking flowers to my dad's grave. Anyway does anyone know if you're expected to take a present to one of these ridiculous occasions?
Thanks.
Found this if it helps

 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

The Tipsy Titian

VIP Member
But Charles wasn’t bankrolling him. He was paying him a “wage” for undertaking royal duties. No royal duties, no wage!

As for KC buying Harry a house, I wonder if he was hoping that Harry would marry a suitable wife and that he would inherit Highgrove? And it doesn’t take much imagination to know what Meghan would do to it. I suspect it is now earmarked for Charlotte.
I can picture it now.....razed to the ground to be replaced by a monstrosity like Andrew's Southyork
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

ChipDex

VIP Member
^^

It turned out to be a DE columnist paraphrasing the general 'tone' of the book, although I'm willing to bet it was very very close to what Hazza originally dictated over Zoom to his ghostie.


They would have gotten married on a civil ceremony. So the religious wedding would still be the one at Windsor.
The religious bit would only have been a blessing, not a full wedding ceremony, in that case. Like KC3 and QC had.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 18

Flowerstar68

VIP Member
The little girl next to him doesn’t seem too impressed either …. and her outfit is hideous as well. I wonder if the bride had a falling out with her future sister-in-law about them?😂
That's Harry and William's cousin, Emily, Lady Sarah's daughter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

mammaof3

VIP Member
Sorry, also just signing ''Harry'' isn't enough.

if made pursuant to paragraph (b) of that section, the mother, in which case the registrar shall add after her signature the words “Statutory declaration made by ... ... ... ...on ... ... ... ...”, inserting the name and surname of the person acknowledging himself to be the father and the date on which the statutory declaration was made by him,

On my children's Birth Certs they have.
Mr Mamma by declaration dated xxxx
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18

Chita

VIP Member
I'd Like to add one or two titles if I may.

'The Hitchhiker's guide to being Waaargh'

'Waaargh believe it or not'

...and one for good measure 'The Catcher and the Waaargh'

If you post each one separately we can like each one and if you highlight them in bold (the B at the top of the box you type in) they are easier to find when someone starts a new thread.
XxX
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 17

Maleficent50

VIP Member
We had to get a copy of my dad’s birth certificate which was actually an extract from the birth register. It gives a lot more information and it was only then we found out that my dad was registered with one name and it was changed when he was six weeks old. Even he didn’t know that!
Maybe we need to get a copy of the birth register.
Yep that’s what I had to do x
 
  • Like
Reactions: 17