sonic
Member
Does anybody else think that the meeting with Sherborne was set up by the Markle campLady Victoria wonders if his lawyers have set him up
Highly suspicious that this was a by chance meeting!
Does anybody else think that the meeting with Sherborne was set up by the Markle campLady Victoria wonders if his lawyers have set him up
Paul knows where the bodies are buried. I hope he sues the frizzy haired effer for defamation.Paul B is a prat and an attention seeker.
But he did adore Diana and would protect her and her boys.
I wonder why Harry hates him? What does he know?
Who cares about Harry.I'm puzzled that so many articles were written about Harold (and William) from 1996 when he was 11, about private stuff that should have stayed private. Green asked Harold if one article written about him aged 11 upset him, and did he remember it?
The glandular fever story and broken thumb were nobody's business, he was at school. It seems from Green's examination that PC's spin doctor Mark Bolland co-operated with NOTW about the drugs story in 2002 when Harold was 18.
There's no public interest justification, and reporting on minors like this was a betrayal. I can't imagine helping the press with briefings about my son.
I'm very behind on the thread but this is what's emerging for me and I don't understand why he and William weren't protected as youngsters. This has certainly played a big part in what's happening now. The articles about him from childhood were all negative and the image of him fixed for ever is a thick weak child who cheated to get in. All true, but he was under age. Why was it allowed? No Red Line here for the children, that is my only point.
So far, no hacking or eavesdropping, and though Harold is making a fool of himself he has also exposed how he and his brother were subject to media intrusion. Clever Green will trip the addled Stoat up with when exactly he had a mobile phone, but that is not the point. This is Harry's Hill that he will die on, it's not the children.
BIBHe doesn't even have any evidence to back up his claim of phone hacking. This is just ridiculous.
I may have been hacked every day over 15 years
Harry tells the court he filed his claims against MGN and News Group “at around the same time”.
He adds that he believes there was “industrial scale destruction of evidence” of unlawful information gathering in relation to him to which Mr Green asks where he gets this idea from.
“My legal team,” Harry replies.
Mr Green asks whether he thinks his phone was “consistently hacked” throughout the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011, the time period that makes up his claim against MGN.
“It could have been happening on a daily basis, I simply don’t know,” Harry responds.
Asked if he was aware of any evidence to show this, Harry says: “No, that’s part of the reason I’m here, my lord”.
So sadly Harold didn't realise that he was supposed to bring proof into the courtroom.He doesn't even have any evidence to back up his claim of phone hacking. This is just ridiculous.
I may have been hacked every day over 15 years
Harry tells the court he filed his claims against MGN and News Group “at around the same time”.
He adds that he believes there was “industrial scale destruction of evidence” of unlawful information gathering in relation to him to which Mr Green asks where he gets this idea from.
“My legal team,” Harry replies.
Mr Green asks whether he thinks his phone was “consistently hacked” throughout the 15-year period between 1996 and 2011, the time period that makes up his claim against MGN.
“It could have been happening on a daily basis, I simply don’t know,” Harry responds.
Asked if he was aware of any evidence to show this, Harry says: “No, that’s part of the reason I’m here, my lord”.
I agree. A few years ago, our younger grown kid decided he was perfect and we were not and therefore to be ignored. Fine, we said. Ignored him, too, for two years until he came to his senses and returned to the family with humility and sincere remorse. Never once did I consider trying to “reach out,” as it was pointless and weak.Not really, Charles doesn't need to pander to Harry, just get on with what he's doing
he can feel whatever he wants. It’s not a hurt feelings case, it’s a hacking case. Jesus wept.
Well one commentator did say there was a good reason MGN chose to pay off other complainants but not Harry. They knew they had an excellent chance of making him look stupid. And he walked right into it.They prob read this thread tbh
---
like i said on the previous thread there are people in the backround controlling & using Gingernuts for thier own nerferious reasons only numbnuts is too thick to see it
Well we certainly have hard evidence of ridiculousness following this.Hard evidence of suspiciousness![]()
KP just said they would 'offer their support' whatever that means. They should offer to replace, though, they have all the money and time in the world to do so! Tragic someone did this to a charity that supports people in need.
So finally he has HARD EVIDENCE
Hard Evidence that points to...
*drumrolls*
SUSPICIOUSNESS!!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
View attachment 2223316
Oh, God. They are so stupid. I am so done.
Nor mineNot in my house they’re not![]()
Great insight, thanks Chita. Awful Spencer sister. Yet Paul, for all his faults, has never spoken badly about the Spencers.Paul won't want to go through the courts again so Harry will get away with defaming him.
My friend used to work with Paul's brother. They often went to stay with Paul.
When Paul was accused, it was the Spencers who accused him.
One of Diana's sisters was executor of her will. Can't remember which one, sorry but I do remember the details.
In addition to the actual Wiil, there was a letter of intent from Diana indicating which items she wanted her Godchildren to have.
The sister decided that those items should not be given and she ignored Diana's wishes by giving the godchildren something else instead.
The sister was being bullish and taking stuff she thought Diana's "blood family" should now be custodians of.
Paul was horrified by this because he knew Diana so well and he knew what bits Diana wanted "her boys" to have.
When the sister didnt give the godchildren the keepsakes Diana had intended, he decided to move stuff that he knew Diana wanted William and Harry to have so that the sister couldnt take them Into Spencer controlled storage.
He took them for safe keeping while the sister was going through Diana's stuff like a tornado.
He then intended to give the stuff to the boys but never got chance because of what happened next.
Another member of the Royal household staff had taken some of Diana's stuff without permission - if I remember correctly, a painting was one of them. It appeared somewhere in the USA for sale.
The Spencer sister wrongly assumed Burrell had stolen it and was trying to sell it.
So she instigated the police inquiry and legal action against Burrell.
We know what happened next. He never got chance to give the stuff to "the boys." It was removed from his home and he was accused of stealing it with the intent to sell it for personal gain.
I know a lot of people hate the guy but he LOVED Diana and will never betray her.
Yes he got a bit carried away talking to the press after she died but he was caught up in that WEIRD bubble we were all in. It was a very strange atmosphere and we were all acting as if under some kind of spell.
He was affected by that craziness as were thousands of people.
Sadly now, he has been defamed AGAIN. This time by Harry who knows Paul will not want to go to court and drag all of that awfulness up again.
Just when you think Harry is the shittiest shit there could ever be, he goes and does something even more shit.
It's high time he got his come uppance.
Come ON court case - humiliate him and rule against him.
Come ON USA officials - slap him with a tax bill for a shit ton of money then deport him.
It's time he was taught a lesson.