This is where Harry got most muddled and badly advised. Everyone knows the Mirror has form and hacked other peoples phones. He assumed because of this he would automatically be believed.Chap on GBNEWS saying it doesnt matter if others can prove THEY were hacked
The ONLY consideration is whether he has proof HE was hacked
Maybe any cheers were because he can now FOff back to the USA ?I've just watched it... seemed to just be people yelling 'Harry' rather than cheering as such.
Will he fuck off now? I do hope so
BIB"My lord, my whole life the press have misled me, covered up their wrongdoing." I don't think this is having the impact that he wants it to have. It reeks of what the madman said before they put the straitjacket on him and hauled him away.
I am beginning to think that this case has very little to do with Harry and much more with David Sherborne and the legal team. Until Sherborne approached him on holiday Harry was not even aware of these Mirror articles or that he'd possibly been hacked. So the "distress" and "pain" seems to be something Harry constructed retrospectively. It seems like the lawyers saw an opportunity with a highly impressionable person like Harry, who had a long standing, but vaguely defined, grudge against the tabloid media. According to Harry's own evidence the lawyers approached him, picked the cases, helped him write his statement and suggested that invoices to PIs were evidence of hacking. They approached and told suggestable Harry that he'd been hacked and he believed them. Suddenlythe legal team got a huge celebrity client toThis is where Harry got most muddled and badly advised. Everyone knows the Mirror has form and hacked other peoples phones. He assumed because of this he would automatically be believed.
The difference between these children and yours or mine though is that these were children born into the monarchy and in direct line of succession and the public were interested and invested in what was published about them. I don’t agree with the press obtaining information or publishing articles which they had gained illicitly but it happened. Don’t forget his mother was well renowned for leaking stories herself, and his father, it may not have been directly about their children but it was the culture that existed and still does within the RF press office. When you delve into the case itself it clearly shows although Hairy had a great dislike for the press throughout his life, his decision to litigate at this stage in said life began in 2018, when the body blows about Meagain began. I’m of the opinion that as he has unravelled since his marriage all of this downfall is fuelling this vendetta and he is so far in now he will continue until he is a broken man. People have short memories. He’s a man now, with supposedly a family of his own. Not an 11 year old boy born into one of the most privileged positions there is. The children I feel sorry for are not 11 year old Harry or William. They are the neglected, starving, homeless and uncared for children throughout the country and indeed the world. Harry’s world is exactly that to him. We aren’t allowed in unless invited. Well if he chooses to let his dirty linen be aired in court then he has let us in. There’s nothing in his case that wasn’t already in the public domain and raked over time and again. He is an arrogant fool who played the court jester perfectly in my opinion.I'm puzzled that so many articles were written about Harold (and William) from 1996 when he was 11, about private stuff that should have stayed private. Green asked Harold if one article written about him aged 11 upset him, and did he remember it?
The glandular fever story and broken thumb were nobody's business, he was at school. It seems from Green's examination that PC's spin doctor Mark Bolland co-operated with NOTW about the drugs story in 2002 when Harold was 18.
There's no public interest justification, and reporting on minors like this was a betrayal. I can't imagine helping the press with briefings about my son.
I'm very behind on the thread but this is what's emerging for me and I don't understand why he and William weren't protected as youngsters. This has certainly played a big part in what's happening now. The articles about him from childhood were all negative and the image of him fixed for ever is a thick weak child who cheated to get in. All true, but he was under age. Why was it allowed? No Red Line here for the children.
So far, no hacking or eavesdropping, and though Harold is making a fool of himself he has also exposed how he and his brother were subject to media intrusion. Clever Green will trip the addled Stoat up with when exactly he had a mobile phone, but that is not the point. This is Harry's Hill that he will die on, it's not the children.
They were NOT all negative he was the most popular royal for a LONG time, if he hadn't cheated it wouldn't have been reported on (quite a big deal by the way shows that the royals were abusing their position so SHOULD have been said out loud) Even his own mum said he was thick, the most reported on woman in the world said those words. Aim your anger at her.The articles about him from childhood were all negative and the image of him fixed for ever is a thick weak child who cheated to get in. All true, but he was under age. Why was it allowed?
.... and your case needs, like, evidentiary support?
KP just said they would 'offer their support' whatever that means. They should offer to replace, though, they have all the money and time in the world to do so! Tragic someone did this to a charity that supports people in need.
I'm puzzled that so many articles were written about Harold (and William) from 1996 when he was 11, about private stuff that should have stayed private. Green asked Harold if one article written about him aged 11 upset him, and did he remember it?
The glandular fever story and broken thumb were nobody's business, he was at school. It seems from Green's examination that PC's spin doctor Mark Bolland co-operated with NOTW about the drugs story in 2002 when Harold was 18.
There's no public interest justification, and reporting on minors like this was a betrayal. I can't imagine helping the press with briefings about my son.
I'm very behind on the thread but this is what's emerging for me and I don't understand why he and William weren't protected as youngsters. This has certainly played a big part in what's happening now. The articles about him from childhood were all negative and the image of him fixed for ever is a thick weak child who cheated to get in. All true, but he was under age. Why was it allowed? No Red Line here for the children.
So far, no hacking or eavesdropping, and though Harold is making a fool of himself he has also exposed how he and his brother were subject to media intrusion. Clever Green will trip the addled Stoat up with when exactly he had a mobile phone, but that is not the point. This is Harry's Hill that he will die on, it's not the children.
Thank you! And thank you!Huge Congratulations. And remember, your Moms problem affects you, but it is her problem. YOU are not the problem. Sending love.
View attachment 2223849
and Hazno’s an ass!
Well done, how wonderful for you
Thank you so much!yay well done on the job and well done for standing your ground You must do what is best for you
I’d have hard evidence of suspiciousness regarding that myselfAnd how did the barrister find him?
did he hack his phone?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?