Not sure that Harry's very personal revelations about P William 'interest's the public' and it is definitely not 'in the public's interest'.Which Hazza as a best selling author would say, he understands fully how telling ‘alleged’ stories about people for money is a legitimate pursuit.
And a bag.. sorry a can of cokeGot my pain in the arse rental inspection tomorrow and I've got to clean the cooker
Tattlers are delaying me....
Dear Agent Can we postpone please as......
How can you sink so low as to use someone else's, or your own potential, suicide as a threat and/or shield?He's mentioned Caroline Flack. That's him and Schofield
Like his mum isn't hethe other way around: it was Hoare who called the police, then police traced it to Diana and several phone boxes around Kensington, the press started to get some rumours from their connections with the police, but finally Diana leaked to her mouthpieces that it was a school mate of the Hoares' son who played the pranks. The boy and his mum came forwards with receipts that they weren't in London at the time of the calls, but no one payed hem attention, they really put the lid on that scandal.
and a bag .. sorry can of cokeDo we think he's brought a pack up for lunch?
Cheese sarnie and a bag of Wotsits?
This is his problem - he has not proved hacking - all of these articles are puff pieces - Harry's 18th, Harry's sick, Harry hurts thumb, Harry struggles to cope with divorce etc etc - he has not pointed to one piece of evidence that was totally private in them and that couldn't have been sourced in multiple ways.I m fascinated by the way that Hazno knows for a fact that any articles in the paper were written beforehand and then taken to the palace press offices for confirmation!
How on earth can he have known this? How does he know the journalists werent just phishing when talking to the palace press offices.
Haznos witness statement just comes across as so......poor poor, little hard done by me. The press hacked my phone, and knew that I was going to Sandhurst and I wasnt going on a gap year.
And then after hacking the phones and finding out that I wasnt doing a gap year, they found out I was doing a gap year in Australia, working on a farm, and I would hide from the paps indoors to avoid them. Those 2 statements contradict each other, if they knew about no gap year, how come he went on one without the press realising?
Jeez…. My laughing reaction emoji is running out I’ve used it so often in this thread!
What a Court Jester he is! Thanks for all the posts that are keeping me up with what is happening in Court and how it’s been reported/perceived!
Entitled brainless tosser correcting a barrister on the letter of the law.
But has he read that information and decided it happened to him too. I really don’t think the press thought he was important enough to hack.The only thing that stood out in the witness statement was him sometimes listening to a message that he hadn't heard before but it wasn't 'new' on voicemail and sometimes seeing a notification of a new message that would disappear before he would listen to it.
I've heard those things stated before in other hacking cases...
how you would prove it? I don't know, but I suspect the papers will have to prove their sources from elsewhere in order to win.
Well we all know that doing his own written work is not Hazzno's strong point - as revealed in the Sarah Forsyth v Eton College industrial tribunal in 2005
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?