She didn't say that, the media did-nope won't work.
She didn't say that, the media did-nope won't work.And THIS is how they plan to cover their arses!!
The only thing I've ever seen of William looking cross was when they were being followed on a bike ride and he (quite rightly) had a proper rant.The sewer rat has resurfaced.....
Very true.He didn’t want an ordinary life, he wanted a privileged life without having to work for it. All the perks with none of the responsibilities.
Is this article a rehab one, a pity party for poor wee Hazbeen who's always had such a terrible life, or just plain shit-stirring?
Well, after all those years of hating his life, etc, he's finally got what he wanted now, hasn't he? Freedom from the nasty institution who made his life such a living hell.
Except he still expected to cherry pick the "best bits" of that hell-on-earth, like paid-for security, a home on a Royal estate, titles, CoS, and the best seats in the house at any and all RF events he deigns to attend.
TBH, you could probably offer the twat the Throne, and it still wouldn't be good enough. IMO, even if Diana hadn't died, he'd probably still be whining about something. The resentment towards William clearly pre-dated 1997. It would most likely have been joined by resentment towards a stepdad and younger half-siblings who took Mummy's attention away from the most important stuff - him.
I hope KC3 never lets him get a foot back in the 'Working Royal' door.
What did she expect from the Queen? Her grandmother in law? Is it normal to leave (the most recent and problematic) grandchild’s spouse something in a will?Lady C
Thoughts on Haz and Thomas Markle meeting up? İnteresting spin that Haz and not Smeg want to meet up. Could be yet another diversionary tactic by the Harkles. İf it is more than a rumour then TM (according to TM Jnr) would consider seeing Haz. A port of call for Haz on his voyage of discovery of the truth as Smeg has told so many lies to boost herself.
Thoughts on Smeg's hypocrisy? Smeg miscalculated and did not achieve what she wanted which was to be left in TLQ's will (nor was Haz). Lady C to elaborate further in a future vlog.
But Catherine hasn’t droned on and on about her experiences etc. I am certain we would have got a naked Pregnancy photo and book telling us all how to be a mother, along with long expositions on her actual birth. This is why .I doubt she gave birth to either kid.To be fair, neither has Catherine.
I still don't believe MM was pregnant to Harry, but for me, this isn't really evidence of that. I'm on the fence about the children and not sure what I think when it comes to surrogacy or rentakid or "too ugly to be shown in public", but I absolutely believe she didn't carry them and she didn't give birth to them.
We Tattlers felt pretty certain that Fark and Lillibucks weren't brought to the UK last Summer or that they came over here during the week that the Harkles stayed for the Queen’s funeral. The photos of the kids at Frogmore are all photoshopped. Now why would they do that?
I don't think I've ever seen any articles claiming Catherine was a bully. And if it happened there would have been, because the media were hostile to her for years. Whereas Rebecca English actually witnessed something going on with Smeg in Fiji, and a staff member left in tears.The sewer rat has resurfaced.....
I don't think I've ever seen any articles claiming Catherine was a bully. And if it happened there would have been, because the media were hostile to her for years. Whereas Rebecca English witnessed something going on with Smeg in Fiji, and a staff member left in tears.
Nice try at deflection there, Myra, but no.
We've also seen plenty of photographic evidence of Hazza's aggression. Bleeding polo ponies, and brawling with paparazzi in public. Where's William doing that? Because if he's truly aggressive it would be reported on. As with Catherine, the media were also quite hostile to him. And adoring to Hazza.
So again, Myra, nice try but pull the other one.
Welcome to the ‘older but wiser’ group on here, or we like to think we are! Didn’t you also graduate from New Member recently? Congratulations @ravjav on both happy occasions.I'm going to be 70 on Tuesday and I have better skin as well.
90 fecking thousand?The Dior tent was pretty bad and cost £90,000
View attachment 2204879
We bought our first house for that much! I'm actually speechless, noone in this world needs to spend that much money on an outfit! & they had the cheek to call out people who have more than 2 children, but spend obscene amounts on shite, jog on clowns.90 fecking thousand?
Dear god......
No doubt it would look fabulous on Catherine but on her it looks like a Primark seconds
It looks like a Transformation Challenge from Sewing Bee where you have to make a garment from a vintage shower curtain then attach random trimming around the sleeve that you have dug out of an old British Home Stores carrier bag.It looks like cheap polyester scuba fabric, horrid colour. Also what is happening to her boobs in this picture, they seem to have a straight horizontal line at the apex. Are they supplemental pads or something?!
She wears her clothes like Cherie Blair - always looks like a bag ofOn the topic of horrendous attire, here's the Green Goblin outfit from the back:
View attachment 2205146
Who wore it better?
Judging by the state of it bottom left it's never seen an iron!Given the new information of how they were asking for a discount and/or freebee at The Carlyle and and asking a baker to give them a birthday cake for free because of the PR the baker would get, I certainly think that many of these clothing items were mooched for the PR aspect or at least a very significant discount was given. Do I think that there could have been two invoices? You bet I do! One with the real cost and the other with the inflated cost. Or there was a kick back scheme in place. Maybe that is really what got Claire Waight -Keller fired from Givenchy. Everything that Markle touches has a taint of dishonestly attached to it.
---
Oh look! Iron on tape embellishment down the side. That is 10k right there!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?