Harry & Meghan #344 Muppets!

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
There's some article on People about Markles "go to jacket" and I'm not going to give them the click. It's just continuous merching leading up to her rebrand. They are all over the news, every. single. day. Do they even understand market saturation? People are so sick of them but they are scraping the floor for every little bit. It's just not sustainable, nothing they've built or branded is sustainable.
You know, I thought the gist of the deal when the Markles left for America was that they could keep their titles, but not trade off them. Yet that’s all they’ve seemed to do since they got here, whether it’s wearing (and announcing) branded clothing or selling family secrets, real or imagined. Did I misunderstand the terms? I’m vicariously embarrassed for the monarchy.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 40
Some little bits and pieces to know regarding the latest bullshit Hazno is spinning:

Harry and William ran a joint royal household up untill March 2019, and untill 2013 they shared the same private secretary (Lowther-Pinkerton), thus it would have required a concerted effort to exclude Hazno from anything. Harry's lawyers have already admitted that he had learned of an arrangement to delay any settlement between News Corp and the royals as long ago as 2012, which would have been a more suitable point for him to instigate action (rather than seven years later).

Much of Hazno's bullshit is being spouted under legal privilege, that's why he's able to do it.

The court has been told Diana declined police protection after her divorce because she feared officers were leaking to the tabloids - even though at the time most accounts stated it was because she thought they were feeding information back to Charles. The most prolific leaker to the papers about the private life of Diana was Diana herself, via Richard Kay and Andrew Morton.



Source: Private Eye.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 54
Here is a nice little rant. Sounds like one of us tattlers.

If only this writer didn't sit on the fence or beat around the bush 🤔 I wish they would just tell us what they REALLY think...
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 30
I've been thinking about how close William and Harry were supposed to be before MM entered the scene, and Ive realised that I can't recall a picture of H with William and Catherine's children. Are there any?

ETA I mean informal, larking about type pictures, rather than standing on a balcony chatting type.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24
I've been thinking about how close William and Harry were supposed to be before MM entered the scene, and Ive realised that I can't recall a picture of H with William and Catherine's children. Are there any?

ETA I mean informal, larking about type pictures, rather than standing on a balcony chatting type.
I’ve wondered would the Wales children even remember H&M
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30
Congrats @Bobble22 on VIP. 🍾 🍾 🍾

At the time the phone hacking was made public, Piers gave an interview and he said it is common knowledge that people's voicemail messages could be easily accessed because most people didn't change the factory set PIN number.
He then denied having ever done that himself or ever having instructed anyone else to do it.

I remember him saying that because I didn't know how the papers had got access to phones. I thought they must have somehow planted bugs or tapped into phone lines to listen in.

So the getting into stored messages via PIN number hadnt occurred to me until Piers gave that info.
So even if he didn't do it or didn't authorise stsff to do it, he knew how to do it.

It's very murky.
As much as I now dislike Harry, I am on his side in this issue. If journos hacked private phones they deserve to be sued.

I think compensation will definitely be forthcoming, and rightly so. William got it, and Haz undoubtedly deserves some too.

The problem with Haz though, is that compensation won't be enough.

He seems to think this is still some sort of criminal trial, when all that's been done and dusted.

And he's on a righteous crusade to control the media, and what we get to read, when it comes to reporting on him.

From his own behaviour, he clearly doesn't give a tit about how they report on the rest of his family, or their privacy rights. He's perfectly happy to breach those when it suits him.

This case isn't really about journalistic standards at all. It's about him. It's always about him.

Grandstanding in court might give him some satisfaction, but we've yet to see the emotional cost. If negative stuff comes out about Diana and her own intimate relationship with the media, what will he do then? He can't blame his brother who settled, possibly for exactly that reason.

Remember, Piers Morgan was on good enough terms with Mummy to be invited to KP for lunch with her and William.

JMO
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 45
I've been thinking about how close William and Harry were supposed to be before MM entered the scene, and Ive realised that I can't recall a picture of H with William and Catherine's children. Are there any?

ETA I mean informal, larking about type pictures, rather than standing on a balcony chatting type.
Probably only in private collections.

After Diana died a deal was made with the press regarding royal children.
The press agreed there would be no stalking or unauthorised following of the children and in return they would be given official pictures to print.

It was agreed upon by all so future kids were not treated like Diana and the boys had been before she died.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 35
In TRG video upthread she has done some serious research! This is a screenshot from the video. Andrew and M disappeared below deck for 3 days. Could this be the 'secret' that M is threatening KC with and why he is so soft with them?


Assuming Meghan and Andrew did do rudeys together in the past, let us examine this.

Charles dated Diana's older sister in the past. Maybe they did rudeys.
Diana obvs didn't mind that her sister had been there first.
Princess Anne dated Andrew Parker-Bowles in the past. Maybe they did rudeys.

If no money exchanged between Andrew and Meghan IF they were intimate, is it really a big deal?
Girls on yachts can get around the law by saying they were paid to be there as hostesses.

If this story is true, it's embarrassing for those involved because they have pretended to have not met previously and also a problem if money for sexual acts was paid.

I think they should just let all the truth come out.
The stories will be in the press for a while but then everyone will move onto the next scandal.

Many people think badly of both of them anyway so if it's true and it comes out, how much worse could things be?
Not much, unless Harry didn't know his uncle had been there first.
If he did know and doesn't care then it's only a problem if money was paid for sexual acts.

Ugh.
What a sordid situation.
I'm sick of the lot of 'em to be honest.
So I'm off to look at cute animal videos on youtube.


See ya all later.
---
He's not a jealous man thank goodness.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 32
Kay Burley on Sky has just said something about one of Sophie's motorbike escorts knocked over an elderly woman yesterday... (the lady is still in hospital)

I'll try and find a link to it.


P.S. I'm a few pages behind so it's probably already been talked about
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Wow
Reactions: 21
Assuming Meghan and Andrew did do rudeys together in the past, let us examine this.

Charles dated Diana's older sister in the past. Maybe they did rudeys.
Diana obvs didn't mind that her sister had been there first.
Princess Anne dated Andrew Parker-Bowles in the past. Maybe they did rudeys.

If no money exchanged between Andrew and Meghan IF they were intimate, is it really a big deal?
Girls on yachts can get around the law by saying they were paid to be there as hostesses.

If this story is true, it's embarrassing for those involved because they have pretended to have not met previously and also a problem if money for sexual acts was paid.

I think they should just let all the truth come out.
The stories will be in the press for a while but then everyone will move onto the next scandal.

Many people think badly of both of them anyway so if it's true and it comes out, how much worse could things be?
Not much, unless Harry didn't know his uncle had been there first.
If he did know and doesn't care then it's only a problem if money was paid for sexual acts.

Ugh.
What a sordid situation.
I'm sick of the lot of 'em to be honest.
So I'm off to look at cute animal videos on youtube.


See ya all later.
---


He's not a jealous man thank goodness.
for me, it's the first sentence that holds no water. whoever wrote this fiction of a bunch of European poshos readily befriending a rando American begpacker and taking him to their yacht has never traveled outside the boundaries of their home town.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 24
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.