BIBNo,no,no! No IPP status for Haznobrains …… he needs to face the consequences of his actions rather than them being covered up like they have been his whole life. He is a grown man now and reality needs to smack him in the face, no more protecting the wimp. Also IPP status would automatically come with security and I’ll be damned if I’m paying taxes to cover paid security for that little shit, his Ho and two dolls …. No way!
And your gently swaying sporran Johnny!Just in case it is Johnny.... yoohoo Johnny we love you.
I will be fucking livid if William gives so much as an inch. I am a grudge holder, appeasement and being the bigger person isn’t in my make up and giving into that snivelling ginger cunt and forgetting his appalling behaviour makes my blood pressure steam .BIB
No, I don't think you're wrong.
Here's Jobson. Haven't watched the clip, but according to the replies (who aren't having any of it) he's called William "churlish".
Remember, Clarence House co-operated with him on his first Charles book.
I feel for William and Catherine because there's definitely some kind of a "narrative" coming from somewhere. Suddenly all the RRs are singing variations of the same tune.
We seem to be coming full circle back to "Poor Wee Hazza."
And if William has to be made into an obstinate villain, then so be it. Never mind Spare, NF, Oprah, the Catherine-bashing, etc. Water under the bridge.
You can see it in the other pieces from CT, Roya, etc.
Charles "pleased". Camilla "forgiving". William "pragmatic", ie the roadblock to a full-on, happy-clappy family reunion.
What next? The balcony for "Darling Boy"? I wouldn't be surprised.
If I were William, I'd call myself Duke of Cornwall, bugger off somewhere rural with Catherine, the kids and the Duchy, and live a quiet life as a landowner.
Leave the rest to it, and see how long the Monarchy's support lasts without W&C's popularity propping it up.
JMO
I love Ramblin Sid and Round the HorneSorry to quote myself, but I remembered that RSR did write A Sussex song
I love these names for Harry, his wife and children
I’ve fixed the Montedeceito pipes , Meghan….’ oh those pipes ‘ ….from Princeharry FB puff-puff
ooops - my arm slipped .. sorry...
I'm with you on this one - I'm still laughingHappy Sunday, Tattlers!! I must not have slept very well last night because this video got me laughing long and hard…It’s just so silly!!
All this reporting re Kate pushing for Rachel's non-attendance, even if true - has been taken out of context, I'm sure of it. If anything, she has not requested this on her own behalf as I think she is made of strong stuff (re her glares at TW stopping that madam in her tracks & moving her & W to the fore) - this is for William - she has had to be his bolster & support against Todger's continuous salvos and knows what impact these have had on him as the major target of the jealously. Todger wants W & his family to step away from the stresses of being the heir - by fair means or foul. This could be the ultimate aim.I will be fucking livid if William gives so much as an inch. I am a grudge holder, appeasement and being the bigger person isn’t in my make up and giving into that snivelling ginger cunt and forgetting his appalling behaviour makes my blood pressure steam .
We can’t let William bugger off anyway because Mad Harold will be poisoning Charles’ earl grey .
The similarities are…, striking.
The MoogAlways room for more KennethI grew up watching Willo the Wisp
It's about time that they dropped this narrative about the number of engagements and thought about quality of work over quantity. After all it doesn't mean that William isn't working just because he's doing something behind the scenes instead of shaking some hands in public.
Camilla Tominey talking to Robert Jobson.No, no, no...why should it always be William's responsibility to make the concessions to his spoiled brat of a brother?!
Brilliant! I've never listened to one of these before, and just posted the same thoughts as you.BIB
No, I don't think you're wrong.
Here's Jobson. Haven't watched the clip, but according to the replies (who aren't having any of it) he's called William "churlish".
Remember, Clarence House co-operated with him on his first Charles book.
I feel for William and Catherine because there's definitely some kind of a "narrative" coming from somewhere. Suddenly all the RRs are singing variations of the same tune.
We seem to be coming full circle back to "Poor Wee Hazza."
And if William has to be made into an obstinate villain, then so be it. Never mind Spare, NF, Oprah, the Catherine-bashing, etc. Water under the bridge.
You can see it in the other pieces from CT, Roya, etc.
Charles "pleased". Camilla "forgiving". William "pragmatic", ie the roadblock to a full-on, happy-clappy family reunion.
What next? The balcony for "Darling Boy"? I wouldn't be surprised.
If I were William, I'd call myself Duke of Cornwall, bugger off somewhere rural with Catherine, the kids and the Duchy, and live a quiet life as a landowner.
Leave the rest to it, and see how long the Monarchy's support lasts without W&C's popularity propping it up.
JMO
So William and Kate are now supposed to shoulder the blame for Hazno being a twatCamilla Tominey talking to Robert Jobson.
This was a bit difficult to follow at times as they kept talking over each other. Robert Jobson has a book to sell "Our King".
RJ suggested Chuck is bringing the Stoat in from the cold but there's no rapprochement with William, but W will support his father and his day will come. Is William looking churlish?
Jobson says KC is misunderstood, a visionary and eccentric, honourable and decent. Agreed that he doesn't appeal to youngsters.
Camilla Tominey asked why as an eco-warrior wasn't Chuck more popular? The answer to this important question was lost with them interrupting each other, so will forever remain a mystery.
(Tattlers are invited to submit suggestions, to be evaluated by Johnny who is now an Hon. Tattler)
Camilla asked if the Cambridges were work-shy, and Robert Jobson said not exactly work-shy but they "could do more".
The Stoats were a loss to the RF, but now should have their titles removed.
Robert's a great admirer of Princess Anne who works hard.
.....................
I found it odd that Jobson should see the Stoat situation as "KC rapproacement -V- William stubborn" in such simplistic terms, ignoring a whole catalogue of cruelty and betrayal including unkindness to both Chuck's parents.
It seems to me that William recognises the malign danger that the Stoat presents to his Family, and that Chuck for his own PR reasons is choosing to ignore the danger.
So the PR is "Chuck the loving father, William the churlish unforgiving brother" backed by Catherine, an equally unforgiving wife. Chuck really is a master-manipulator, using the cover of Loving Father to do a deal with the Stoat that will protect the Stoat and the RF (him, not William whose hands are clean.)
Of course William knows it, and must feel totally betrayed. JMO.
I would never refer to myself as a Ho. I much prefer “sisters before misters”.Maybe rehabilitating her image is part of the divorce/fuck off overseas package?
Definitely! I've been saying that to my friend lately. Don't know how my soon-to-be BIL will take that though
ETA: Ho's before Bros only when the Bros are shite though. But then they wouldn't classify as Bros
Probably all crap though isn't it? They aren't going to tell about what they say in private. I'm sick of the stories I read, newspapers can't possibly know if any of this is true in my opinion of course.I wish a journalist or RR would remind people of all the nasty spiteful things the harkles said and did. Its needs to be repeated as it seems some have short memories. This talk of KC being so pleased that Shitbum is coming, and warmly welcomed is driving me mad. As is all the digs at W & C. When was the last time KC said anything nice about W?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?