But how long did she leave the children alone in California when the queen died and extended their trip
And, once again, why insist on titles from the family you despise so much and caused your terrible trauma and pain? Why not leave your children to decide when they are older (as stated numerous times over the years)?So Shola, what was H's excuse last year at missing his son's birthday when he chose to attend and play polo
He probably could but the past few years have shown us it’s not all been her, he’s shown his true colours and he’s not a nice person either. I don’t want people making excuses for him if they divorce. I dislike them equally now.Question: am I wrong in thinking that once Harry “is back on the side of the RF” (for lack of a better term), that if he really wanted to he could absolutely annihilate Meghan in the press and everywhere else and there’s nothing really she could do about it (of course she would try the same but nobody really cares and knows she’s full of crap anyway?) I mean with the RF on his side (and him claiming Stockholm etc and repenting etc) Harry could wipe her off the Earth it seems……????? People would be more willing to believe ANYTHING bad about Meghan and that’d be more effective than anything she could retaliate with? Anyone know what I’m getting at? Ultimately Harry is the more powerful one in the end……she is screwed.
They did not say that they were pleased he was attending the announcement said they were PLEASED TO CONFIRM he was attending totally different thing
This may have been mentioned, as I’m still catching up. But her being a ‘mom’ didn’t stop her remaining in the the UK without her children for weeks when the Queen died. Those ‘children’ were also younger when they supposedly came over for the Jubilee for a few days. So they don’t care about a couple of long haul flights for youngsters in a few days of each other. Plus wasn’t it Lily’s birthday during the Jubilee and they did something here and I don’t remember it overshadowing anything. But now, now she’s all so concerned with playing the mom role and her kids birthday. Sure.Her excuses
- 'I didn't want to overshadow the event as all eyes would naturally have been on me - oh, and Harold'
- 'Talking as a loving Mom, Archie & Lili need either me or Harold to be at home with them all the time'
I don't believe he ever left the UK and it was never reported that he returned to America as usually we see pap photos of him arriving back yet on this occasion he was not spotted at the airport.Are we sure that Smurf-knobbed Man-Child actually left the UK after his PR stint with the chronically late court case?
I wouldn't put it past her to have herself papped walking into hospital or something dramatic. Something to guilt trip people. Or her walking into a divorce lawyer's office with a folder.Everytime Meghan has been papped, Harry has been out of town. Who's betting she'll call backgrid and get papped on the day of the coronation! With kids maybe?
Perhaps the Palace has its eye on history. They know the marriage will not last and they want a clean, historic, Meg-free Corrie with the full, blood family on display that can be rewatched in years to come and it will be important from this angle that Harry is given prominence. I am expecting him to be puce with rage and mean mugging throughout however.My hubs who has no love for the monarchy, is convinced that Harry will be allowed to wear a uniform and he will be on the balcony. I wonder if there isn’t something to this. Perhaps The King wanted him to be present for optics and he caved to these two requests. The trade off was that the wife stayed home. I think they really didn’t want her. As far as th kids are concerned no one cares that much about them for them to be a bargaining point. They would be too young to be seen anyway. ,