I like my historians to have quiet gravitas like Kate Williams, not this arm flinging harpy. God awful woman.
I like my historians to have quiet gravitas like Kate Williams, not this arm flinging harpy. God awful woman.I makes up for not knowing anything.
A big thundercloud over a certain 16-bathroom mansion with two tree-like humans or human-like treesOooh Montecito under an evacuation order due to extreme weather!!!!
Well that's one way to get rid of them!
It wouldn’t be simple.When Harry name dropped Courtenay Cox (because of course he did - he's a famewhore much like his wife), did he even stop to think that mentioning she had magic mushrooms could pose issues for her if the police decided to investigate? He's basically said, she was the provider of illicit drugs (well, they were in her fridge, in her home). He just doesn't think, does he?
Also, in the interview - when Bradby (or whatever is name is) asked if the royals are racist and Harry said no, he sort of backtracked and said, "Did Meghan say they were?" - haha ... he was totally digging himself a big hole. Surprised he didn't insist that bit was edited out.
I absolutely loathe these two dimwits - him and Meghan - and wish they would bloody go away and STAY away. But they won't. Next, will be Meghan's book, then Harry will give an interview complaining that his family won't take his calls ... and on it will go, on and on ...
-------------------
As an aside though - and bear in mind that I loathe Meghan - if the following is true, then Kate is surely in the wrong here?
View attachment 1869700
If the dress was too small then sure, it might need to be remade (but all of them??) - but as it was too big and baggy then no - simple alterations would deal to that.
Bob adopted Tiger after both her parents died when she was tiny so she would be with her sisters. There was an argument Michaels parents wanted her but Bob got her. Always thought that was a decent thing to do.I was thinking this because isn't one of Bob Geldof's daughters actually Michael Hutchence's? Swear that because Bob but because he was married to her Mum (Paula Yates, I think) he could claim her as his - which he did.
That entire situation was a toxic mess.
However, in this case if it was proven he could (probably would) still be removed from the LOS. The titles would be down to Charles, presumably.
So here’s the plan. RF has cut off all communication with them. No calls, texts, or meetings. So how can they FORCE them to meet with them?Well well well.
Announcement....get ready at Frogmore. If this is true....
You need 4 months to prepare for a child's birthday party.
Coincidence after Stoat confirms RF not racist?
Anotherpretendtrip like to the Platinum Jubilee when theydidn'tmeet Chuck.
But Chuck said they didwith Camillawithout Camilla.
I'll be watching this with interest.
Liars.
ETA Sorry @LadyMuck I've missed 3 Bookworms... got swamped and still catching up !
We've seen from the Netflix just how often Meghan cries. Its not a big deal in the slightest to make her cry.
If she was someone fairly stoic and crying was a rare occurance then making her cry would be a big deal
Meghan would never type mum. She is American and doesn’t conform to make other people feel better so she would say moms. Calling it fakeWhen Harry name dropped Courtenay Cox (because of course he did - he's a famewhore much like his wife), did he even stop to think that mentioning she had magic mushrooms could pose issues for her if the police decided to investigate? He's basically said, she was the provider of illicit drugs (well, they were in her fridge, in her home). He just doesn't think, does he?
Also, in the interview - when Bradby (or whatever is name is) asked if the royals are racist and Harry said no, he sort of backtracked and said, "Did Meghan say they were?" - haha ... he was totally digging himself a big hole. Surprised he didn't insist that bit was edited out.
I absolutely loathe these two dimwits - him and Meghan - and wish they would bloody go away and STAY away. But they won't. Next, will be Meghan's book, then Harry will give an interview complaining that his family won't take his calls ... and on it will go, on and on ...
-------------------
As an aside though - and bear in mind that I loathe Meghan - if the following is true, then Kate is surely in the wrong here?
View attachment 1869700
If the dress was too small then sure, it might need to be remade (but all of them??) - but as it was too big and baggy then no - simple alterations would deal to that.
Exactly…kind of like dressmaking skills….not tailoring???It wouldn’t be simple.
You would need to take the skirt off. Remove the sleeves, adjust the top of the dress and refit the sleeves. Maybe even make new sleeves.
Then adjust the pleats on the shirt and reattach.
Re hem the dress.
I don't believe this, can't see the RF putting this out like this or what for. It's the Stoats they need to tell to write to Palace lawyers, not people like us laughing on gossip threads. No need to tell us on Tattle that they will only write to the Stoats through heir lawyers either....If this is true, there's no way they'll be going to the coronation...
There MUST be a recording of Trisha jumping on the racism claims after Oprah, on her radio show maybe? I seem to remember she appeared on Good Morning Britain to talk about them/racism too.She’s a muppet! She was straight on the racism bandwagon back at the Oprah interview time
When Harry name dropped Courtenay Cox (because of course he did - he's a famewhore much like his wife), did he even stop to think that mentioning she had magic mushrooms could pose issues for her if the police decided to investigate? He's basically said, she was the provider of illicit drugs (well, they were in her fridge, in her home). He just doesn't think, does he?
Also, in the interview - when Bradby (or whatever is name is) asked if the royals are racist and Harry said no, he sort of backtracked and said, "Did Meghan say they were?" - haha ... he was totally digging himself a big hole. Surprised he didn't insist that bit was edited out.
I absolutely loathe these two dimwits - him and Meghan - and wish they would bloody go away and STAY away. But they won't. Next, will be Meghan's book, then Harry will give an interview complaining that his family won't take his calls ... and on it will go, on and on ...
-------------------
As an aside though - and bear in mind that I loathe Meghan - if the following is true, then Kate is surely in the wrong here?
View attachment 1869700
If the dress was too small then sure, it might need to be remade (but all of them??) - but as it was too big and baggy then no - simple alterations would deal to that.
It's also quite easy to put someone on your contact list as Kate then text pretending to be her.That whole text exchange looks totally bogus for one thing where are times and date on the messages
I think this is just a mock up the paper have compiled from what he said the texts were. Look at the top that’s a mock up not an actual screenshot.Is that really it?? Fucking hell talk about scrapping the barrel. It's nothingness. I have no idea why they are sharing it? Are they really classing this as an argument or Kate being arsey. It it just absolutely pathetic.
View attachment 1869537
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?