Have we ever seen footage of a genuine laugh or smile from her?I had never seen this.
Joking about teenage girls' Catholic uniforms is just...
GROSSS.
View attachment 1761700
Not that I can recollect …… even the smiles on her wedding day were posed and practiced in front of the mirror for weeks beforehand. The woman is a true fake in every sense of the word. Bet when she lets that face slip, takes of the ‘tan’ and the wig in the privacy of their home we wouldn’t recognise her. No wonder she didn’t want to be filmed ‘at home’ by Nutflux!Have we ever seen footage of a genuine laugh or smile from her?
Thanks Lady Muck, very interesting.Interesting video. Are the kids real (no, imo) and rumour that Netflix stopped filming as there was no sight of them
Ridiculous……There’s no comparison …Richard Kay in DM. 'A battle royal for America's heart. 3 decades after Diana took NY by storm, who will prove to be the true heir to her humanitarian crown'
A battle royal for America's heart: Who will prove the heir? # via https://android.com
God, she is really going after Camilla isn't she ?
Any one else think Smegol is trying to release her hounds?
View attachment 1761911
Have we ever seen footage of a genuine laugh or smile from her?
This might well be in the Stoat's book, the damage he says Camilla did to his parents' marriage, and there have been articles about this briefing against Diana before. Camilla was no saint either and the whole triangle was a ghastly mess. KC is a briefer and they were all at the PR machine trying to win. Diana had a huge advantage because she was generally adored, Charles much less and he was jealous of her.God, she is really going after Camilla isn't she ?
Any one else think Smegol is trying to release her hounds?
View attachment 1761911
I found some fascinating comments underneath that video. There's a lot of flatpack truthers around nowInteresting video. Are the kids real (no, imo) and rumour that Netflix stopped filming as there was no sight of them
Why is she even talking about this? These are all white people with white people problems, including Meghan.God, she is really going after Camilla isn't she ?
Any one else think Smegol is trying to release her hounds?
View attachment 1761911
The child that was wearing the onesie was Gavin Gingras and a lot of people have said how similar Archie and Gavin look as they do share quite a few similarities with each other. His mother Brynn went through a miscarriage and when you read her story Meghan's sounds very similar to hers even though Brynn announced her miscarriage after Meghan's.'7:23 why is Archie wearing a onesie that reads “my mommy and daddy are getting married”?'
God, she is really going after Camilla isn't she ?
Any one else think Smegol is trying to release her hounds?
View attachment 1761911
I get a bit fed up of it. I am not personally responsible for something which happened before I was born. I wouldn't blame a murderer's children for their parent's actions.Jeez, some people are capable of moving on after 25+ years shouty but I guess you must have led an exemplary saint like life to think that something that happened in the last century is still worth whining about.
BIB Because that's Gavin Gringas.I found some fascinating comments underneath that video. There's a lot of flatpack truthers around now
'I know for a FACT that Mizz Snarkle DID NOT give birth to this "Lilly" in that Malibu Hospital, since my cousin in SoCal checked with someone who WORKS in that hospital. Enough is ENOUGH!'
'They claimed the child was born in the Cottage Hospital in Santa Barbara...not Malibu, which does not have a hospital at all. However, there is no legal proof, with legitimate birth certificates, with recognized hospital receipts, and respected doctors' sworn statements, for either of her alleged, phantom, children...as she and her husband have claimed, to date.'
'Her sister Samantha told it in a video. Her father Thomas Markle told it also in a video that he went to a doctor's appointment with her when she was in her twenties and he was sitting next to her when the doctor announced that she couldn't never have children anymore....she had a hysterectomy.'
'If Markle actually gave birth she would talk non stop about her pregnancy. She never talks about her pregnancy ever because she doesn’t know anything about it. If she knew something about pregnancy she could have dedicated one her flop casts to it.'
Stop the video at 7.23
'7:23 why is Archie wearing a onesie that reads “my mommy and daddy are getting married”?'
Absolutely right in normal circumstances, but what's happened with the Stoat and his upcoming memoir, plus the fact that the Royals who were so quiet before are now hot news, has brought the past up again.Jeez, some people are capable of moving on after 25+ years shouty but I guess you must have led an exemplary saint like life to think that something that happened in the last century is still worth whining about.
No one is responsible for the sins of their parents, but people like her want to blame everyone else for what their ancestors did, so turnabout's fair play here. No one has asked her about her ancestors, but someone should. Every time a presenter has her as a guest, they should ask her, and they should keep asking her, incuding every graphic detail of everything her ancestors did, until she finally shuts up. What are they afraid of? Shola's shouts? She's already shouting. Shout back.Absolutely right in normal circumstances, but what's happened with the Stoat and his upcoming memoir, plus the fact that the Royals who were so quiet before are now hot news, has brought the past up again.
BookWorm said Diana, and I think it will turn out she's right.
Camilla to be Queen, skeletons in KC's cupboard, plus the Stoat furious and armed with insider knowledge. There are unresolved issues and these never really go away do they. People remember.
Shouty would last 3 minutes criticising her ruling party in Nigeria, but she does it here because she can. Like they all do.
Interesting that nobody has asked her about her slave-trading ancestors. It's not her fault, but she should deal with it honestly and afford the same courtesy to us colonial Raj-celebrating imperialist white middle-aged women, born after the siege at Rorke's Drift.
Why would Brynn allow her son to be used as the fake Archie? Of course the obvious answer is money, but does she really need the money that much?I don't know why the parents of this Gavin let these rumours go around. If you google their child's name so many theories come up and if I were a parent I would protect my child from that.
Weird.
Edit:
To me, this side-by-side of Gavin and Archie is so crazy even though I personally do not believe in the children not existing.
The hair, forehead area, the shape of the head, ears... Too similar.
View attachment 1762036
They have never said anything about the rumours either which is odd because with all these rumours going around they should have come out and said our child is not Archie his name is Gavin but by not saying anything it just raises even more suspicion IMO.I don't know why the parents of this Gavin let these rumours go around. If you google their child's name so many theories come up and if I were a parent I would protect my child from that.
Weird.
The magic protection of the Queen has gone and it seems as though all bets are off. I never consciously realised the control HM held until it was no longer there. Her reputation was totally clean which made her bullet-proof, and we won't find that ever again.No one is responsible for the sins of their parents, but people like her want to blame everyone else for what their ancestors did, so turnabout's fair play here. No one has asked her about her ancestors, but someone should. Every time a presenter has her as a guest, they should ask her, and they should keep asking her, incuding every graphic detail of everything her ancestors did, until she finally shuts up. What are they afraid of? Shola's shouts? She's already shouting. Shout back.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?