Harry & Meghan #11 You’re Muggles Now Harry!

Notice
Thread ordered by most liked posts - View normal thread.
2

2xblended

VIP Member
Carmen 6 said:
So celt news on YouTube ( I won't upload as Penny does that for us) surmises that the baby won't be shown, or brought back to the U.K. because he's been here all along, in the care and custody of the Queen.
Interesting...
Click to expand...
Celt News also said that Harry was being rescued by William and her sources told her he was in Britain, when it was later announced he was actually doing the JP Morgan talk. So, as much as I like to watch those videos for a laugh, there's little merit to the 'facts' they claim to have.
Edit to clarify, I do realise you've said she surmises that Archie won't be shown and that she's not actually claiming to know this as fact; my comment is simply tangential because I remembered the earlier video when I read this.

I can't find the video on the channel anymore (I think it has been deleted), but it was posted on an earlier thread here. I'll edit it in if I can find it.

Edit: Found the post (#860) but the video is gone from there too!

Harry & Meghan #8 Ginge & Cringe: The Great British Break Off

No but just saw her latest post speculating that Pamela May be Andrew’s son 😳 What fresh hell is this! Because of his surname, there's many Anderson though but perhaps MM gave us a hint with Archificial Harry's Son
tattle.life
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Barkin Mad

Barkin Mad

Chatty Member
Campagne said:
Harry !Markled blog has written a great post on the role of a Royal reporters

harrymarkle.wordpress.com

Why History Will Judge The Royal Reporters Harshly

Some of you may dismiss the role of the ‘Royal Reporters’ in this debacle, but what they choose to report makes a difference in the public perception of the Sussexes. Also by analyzing …
harrymarkle.wordpress.com harrymarkle.wordpress.com


Ooh, first hand gossip!
so your friend worked at Frogmore.
can you say any more about why the nannies quit?

( I presume Megz was a demanding bitch)

Looks like she’s coming to the UK, but wants a private jet.

Click to expand...
Con Air, ready for take off
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
FridaK

FridaK

VIP Member
I think she looks great. She and Kate always do. Different styles for different roles but both are gorgeous women.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
V

vikka

VIP Member
HereWeGoAgain101 said:
I agree with everything apart from the
c-section bit. I’m convinced she had a
c-section because of the way she retained the midriff weight for so long. It’s difficult to get rid of that after the muscles have been cut. I had a c-section and was up and back home after 3 days and actually in work after 5. Only briefly but showed up for a meeting. It’s possible. I don’t believe Archificial was a moon bump.
Click to expand...
I think it also depends on body type. I know some women who looked about 5 months pregnant 8 weeks after giving birth!!
Doria has a fuller midsection and I think that's just where the weight stuck with Meghan, esp after pregnancy.
I know some women fit into their pre-pregnancy jeans very soon after giving birth, whilst others looks very pregnant months later.
(talking non-c-section, most women I know gave birth naturally)

freda19 said:
I think she was pregnant.Her baby weight afterwards was very believable and she's too conceited to pile on the pork for a scam.
However, I certainly think she had help getting pregnant. She's nearing 40 and needed a baby to seal the deal so there was no point in wasting time via Mother Nature, even if she'd lent Ginger back his balls long enough for the occasion.🤪 I think she had all her ducks in a row procreationally speaking prior to the wedding to ensure a quick sprogging and I think that's the reason she broke with tradition regarding posting the names of the doctors in attendance at the birth. Because she'd need to use the doctors who helped get her pregnant, seeing things through to the big moment. A quick google search on their names might have brought up what the doctors' specialised in and that wouldn't do at all.
Such a shame as she could have been a poster girl for women desperate to get pregnant. :(But Migraine had to look perfect even perfectly getting pregnant without help.
Click to expand...
There were a number of articles of H&M enlisting help to get pregnant, mostly it was said both changed diets.
Only docs who are assisting the birth are named, not those who help with conception.

Lonewolf said:
Cameron Diaz for example and Robbie Williams and his missus both were able to have surrogate pregnancys without any of the media knowing until they announced it themselves, that's what I think it was with them 2 dimwits!!
Click to expand...
That's what I mean, celebrities can drop off the face of the earth for some time, they can change their personal staff rotations etc to protect and/or hide pregnancies, surrogacies or whatever else they want to cover.
A royal can't do that without raising questions and attracting the attention of monarch and establishment, as well as staff. Then you fear things will leak and if they don't know, they might in years down the line (we still learn new stuff about Victoria or Edward and Wallis etc etc).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Granny

Granny

Active member
Fin said:
I'm no expert but I think a lot had to do with her age when she got married (20?) to a man who was way older than his years. I really don't know the true story behind their marriage but the reason he was never allowed to marry Camilla in the the first place was typical of the rules and regulations that govern the royal family.


Camilla wasn’t a Virgin 😱😱
Prince Andrew wasn’t allowed to marry Koo Stark who is Mother Theresa compared to Meghan, she has never sold her story .
Click to expand...
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 2
Bastille

Bastille

Chatty Member
Boredofgrey said:
What’s the source for the downs comment?

I think an ugly baby and baby having an extra chromosome are a long way apart.
Click to expand...
True, but the likelihood of a Downs baby shoots up when Mum is 35 and carries on increasing every year. Personally I think she'd be shouting from the rooftops if it were true
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
Idontliketogossipbut

Idontliketogossipbut

VIP Member
Rigmor said:
I wonder if Meghan was involved in trafficking girls to Epstein and his ”friends”.



She would because she spent a lot of time with her lovers instead of her sons too according to other posters on the forum.
Click to expand...
Well she certainly had a lot of time to herself to pursue them. Just can't imagine her disapointimg them like that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2