She'd need a man with something in his pants for that.
Let's Harry out.
She'd need a man with something in his pants for that.I think she’ll definitely have another child!
And someone did genuinely try kidnap her!
Meghan needs Marvel more than Marvel needs Meghan. Got a whole list of those
Yeah, looks like a clever bandwagoning scheme/scam.Making cash from the advertising and whatever items they's supposedly selling.For once I don't think bugger-lugs is involved.
It's probably someone in Nigeria. One of the many princes wot live there.
[/QUOT
There is a petition. Yankee Wally I think started it !Someone should start an online petition into their security costs.
They probably cost more than William and Kate now that they are gadding about overseas.
They need to pay half the cost with the UK government.
Apart from the JP Morgan money and the travel agency, I wonde4 how much cash they have made? A couple of million dollars? I bet that has gone on meghan’s tax bill from flogging off her clothes and accepting back handlers.
They just disgust me.
Even if it’s only to get her money’s worth out of those fake pregnancy bumps she bought for last time...!I think she’ll definitely have another child!
She’s really trying to push that feminist agendaMeghan needs Marvel more than Marvel needs Meghan. Got a whole list of thoseSuggestions .....
No I'm not buying what you're selling Smelly. The higher you get in showbiz the more you know about those around you and Oprah is as high as they go. Not a doubt in my mind she's heard rumours on her elite grapevine about most of the dodgy characters. These things are never totally kept under wraps. Those people look after themselves and as long as the shit doesn't happen to them personally they probably don't give a damn what goes on in the grubby underbelly so they waft along 'minding their own business' and leave the ponces etc to get on with it.Can I just say (I'm going to anyway!) that just because someone is seen with another person, or is friends with someone, doesn't mean they know absolutely everything about them!
FFS! I can't stand Oprah but just because she is being a luvvie and sitting next to this twit and posing with him.. doesn't mean she knew he was a rapist! Maybe she did.. most probably she didn't. The same with Andy Pandy and Epstein.. Andy just wanted someone to pay for his private jet and get his leg over .. Do I think he knew and was involved with child sex trafficking? No, not for a second. (I mean initially! No excuse after Epstein was prosecuted).
Everyone always seems so up in the air over association, without knowledge of the persons knowledge!
Rant over
But there was a photo of him in Vancouver in January....So celt news on YouTube ( I won't upload as Penny does that for us) surmises that the baby won't be shown, or brought back to the U.K. because he's been here all along, in the care and custody of the Queen.
Interesting...
He'll be like Cindy Crawford's son who got "misunderstood" tattooed on his face.I worry that of something should happen to meghan and Harry how alone he will be. I mean when Harry lost his mum he had his brother, cousins, dad and grandparents etc. Harry has his maternal grandmother (who I also think doesn't look overly maternal) and that's it. I can't seem Meghan having anymore as she will be all 'one child is enough", "I only have enough love for archie I would worry the other child would be left out" I can hear her saying it,plus the fact she's no spring chicken. I can see Archie feeling very isolated and misunderstood. He will be one of those lost celebrities we read about that will become chaotic and self destructible.
I thought this was a joke, but its true.He'll be like Cindy Crawford's son who got "misunderstood" tattooed on his face.
Ta Daaa!So celt news on YouTube ( I won't upload as Penny does that for us) surmises that the baby won't be shown, or brought back to the U.K. because he's been here all along, in the care and custody of the Queen.
Interesting...
Thanks hunTa Daaa!
This will be Archie in 18 years time. Good luck Harry and Meghan. Imagine showing up at the coronation of George like thisI thought this was a joke, but its true.
He now looks rough as.... View attachment 90099
I've known about Weinstein for a long time and how some women got into films and got their Oscars. I'm nowhere near that industry and I knew. That means that people within the industry knew 100%, no doubt about it and no excuse.Can I just say (I'm going to anyway!) that just because someone is seen with another person, or is friends with someone, doesn't mean they know absolutely everything about them!
FFS! I can't stand Oprah but just because she is being a luvvie and sitting next to this twit and posing with him.. doesn't mean she knew he was a rapist! Maybe she did.. most probably she didn't. The same with Andy Pandy and Epstein.. Andy just wanted someone to pay for his private jet and get his leg over .. Do I think he knew and was involved with child sex trafficking? No, not for a second. (I mean initially! No excuse after Epstein was prosecuted).
Everyone always seems so up in the air over association, without knowledge of the persons knowledge!
Rant over
Exactly. They can sanitize it all they like but most of those feckers knew something was amiss. They don't get where they are without turning a blind eye when required to.I've known about Weinstein for a long time and how some women got into films and got their Oscars. I'm nowhere near that industry and I knew. That means that people within the industry knew 100%, no doubt about it and no excuse.
Word is Jenn Lawrence is off the grid deliberately until the Weinstein stories blow over, as she's one of "his girls".
That's all for the celeb thread I suppose, so I'll just leave this nugget here and leave it at that:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?