#94Royal family scatter 'cos Harry doesn't matter
Last edited:
You speak for me too - but it started with Megxit. At lockdown last March, I found the Queen's address to the nation extremely soothing. It represented something I needed but didn't understand why. Now it's all become a bit of an addiction and I might be a bit in love with W&C.
Hah, you know, I was thinking about Jackie Kennedy Onassis in just this context the other day. How bizarrely golddiggish that Onassis marriage was basically despite her education, grace and stylishness, because nobody, but nobody would marry that vile, ugly, brutish pig Aristotle Onassis unless they were after his fortune or the kind of outlandish lifestyle it could buy. Terrible man, unattractive man, scandalous man, and publicly known to be a truly bad character of a man, nothing secret about his enjoyment of being a brute or a rude pig to the women about him. Jackie saw the hard side of him when he got wind of her writing to an old male friend regretting the marriage, thought she may dare cheat on him, so he arranged for a pap to get the now notorious snaps of her sunbathing nude on Scorpios. Told the photographer when and where she sunbathed there. He did it to humiliate her in a way he knew would really hurt her and her reputation. Nude pap shots back then were a huge deal, a severe scandal and humiliation to someone of her class and stature.I'm beginning to wonder if HFEW end goal is some kind of cut price Jackie O, snag the famous hubby then move onto the billionaire. Very much the Dollartree version.
I tend to think she’s already got her claws dug into some Silicon Valley bag of cash.Hah, you know, I was thinking about Jackie Kennedy Onassis in just this context the other day. How bizarrely golddiggish that Onassis marriage was basically despite her education, grace and stylishness, because nobody, but nobody would marry that vile, ugly, brutish pig Aristotle Onassis unless they were after his fortune or the kind of outlandish lifestyle it could buy. Terrible man, unattractive man, scandalous man, and publicly known to be a truly bad character of a man, nothing secret about his enjoyment of being a brute or a rude pig to the women about him. Jackie saw the hard side of him when he got wind of her writing to an old male friend regretting the marriage, thought she may dare cheat on him, so he arranged for a pap to get the now notorious snaps of her sunbathing nude on Scorpios. Told the photographer when and where she sunbathed there. He did it to humiliate her in a way he knew would really hurt her and her reputation. Nude pap shots back then were a huge deal, a severe scandal and humiliation to someone of her class and stature.
I highly doubt a typical modern shallow trophy hunting billionaire would touch Markle though. Too old, too many kids, her being an abject, obvious and cynical operator, her value lying only in being notorious via marriage rather than a trophy in and of herself. Jackie was definitely a huge trophy for Onassis, his ego loved bagging world famous. talented and beautiful women (Maria Callas being another) then destroying them.
Thing with Jackie is she was world famous and widely admired during her marriage, and considered an admirable and iconic woman, rather than reviled or at least highly controversial like Markle already is. Jackie is the one who charmed Nikita Khrushchev into complete soppy admiration at a very tense point in the cold war, let's not forget. Although JFK cheated on Jackie constantly, there was no real scandal on Jackie herself and the marriage ended through his death, rather than a scandalous divorce.
I don't doubt if Markle divorces, she'll be on the hunt for the next mark, but I highly doubt anyone in the billionaire class will be biting, unless they're looking for trouble.
its crazy isn't it ? we're here living as best we can and almost there is this parallel universe. /those that have and those who have NotNot going to lie, the last few days I have been obsessed with all of this! Have only really ashamedly learned lots about the Royal Family in the last two years, prior knowledge was via my parents and from reading the papers years ago.
I've read so many of these threads, read about moonbumps-blooming links to articles off these threads!
Absolute insanity how far I have wandered away from this thread sometimes but find the psychology behind it all fascinating.
Hehe
İ feel for Charles too at this time. Hopefully PP gave PC some wise counsel re. the Harkles/titles/succession/funding/children's titles/divorce strategy and he and PW will consider it all in the context of their summit re. Royal Family and patronages going forward. No amount of money will make Harry's wife shut up, and no amount of leniency or explanation will open JCMH's eyes. PC has to protect the Monarchy from the Harkles for his own and PW's futures.Actually, I feel he is a really truly sensitive soul, he didn't always have a great relationship with PP but as time has gone by they have both become really close. he showed visibly signs of upset and tears, the other siblings were probably hurting as much inside for sure, Stoic Anne for sure,( not sure about Andrew as I don';t like him). Chaz is a gentle soul easily hurt and quite vulnerable and I feel he absolutely wants to do the right thing. I have been a big supporter of his letting the crown go to Will, but now I think we could all benefit from his input. Choppy waters ahead maybe he could be what we need in the interim.
On another note.... If any national papers need "a Source". " A royal source". " a friend of the.." Any one of you amazing tattlers could step up
You all know more about the situation , the history, the nuances and express yourselves more eloquently, and you can all define and read between the PR crap than any of the freelance freeloaders reading our posts and making a few quid off our discussions.
Well it looks like we will probably find out if this is true or not, by whether Wallis2.0 sues Jean!This lady's blog is spot on each time
Why Meghan Markle Is LYING That She Is PREGNANT When She Is NOT
I did give this woman of perdition the chance to redeem herself before the funeral of the Duke, but she clearly refused my offer of redemption on behalf of Great Britain. Her audacity to write a ha…jeangasho.com
I bring forth from said blog this gem:Not seen this blog before, and don't actually know how to respond. Yes, I think she's spot on in her observations. But, I think I need another read in day light hours.
Does anyone else feel like they are being drawn into "other multiple" rabbit holes. This stuff begins to play with your mind.
Of all the headlines I've ever seen about HFSEX this is the most ludicrous. She's putting herself on a par with Catherine - as a peacemaker! HSEXW caused all the trouble in the first place. Mangy dingo.Harry was always disgusting, but he found his perfect match in Markle.Meghan and Kate 'played peacemaker with husbands' ahead of Philip's funeral
Meghan Markle and Kate Middleton are said to have stepped in to smooth things over between their husbands, Prince Harry and Prince William, ahead of the funeral of their grandfather Prince Philipwww.mirror.co.uk
Delusions of grandeur, envy and malice multiplied.
I meant deliberate DISTRESS not success.The key point is that Charles dithered as Diana was the mother of his sons & although exasperated, he did not wish her harm or deliberate success. However, sharp decisions were made & she was moved on, she survived this period & could have gone on to thrive (apologies that markleism creeping in). But due to a short series of poor decisions, she died young & we’ll never know.
So my point is that there is no evidence that booting the difficult & recalcitrant out of the RF, even stripping the HRH, does lasting harm. Yes, the ego is insulted but it is not irretrievably damaged. Hazza has been a square peg in right royal hole for many years, they’ve done their best to find him useful purposeful work (Invictus Games just came out of the box ready to run), but he’s trashed that by his own impatience, lack of insight & whatever(!).
There is a strong case for cutting the apron strings.
I bring forth from said blog this gem:
‘If she really had any maternal instinct, and there was really a seed growing in her womb, she would have not done the Oprah interview for the love of her unborn child. She would have owed it to her child to give birth peacefully, without the public speculation and outcry. Her behaviour is abnormal for a woman carrying a child.’
Bracing stuff!
[
This. Charles will be torn. The interview knocked him for six certainly, but I still think he would have wavered regarding grey rocking hazza ...I don’t know about that. Charles going off to Wales to think gives me hope. He’s such a notably sensitive, tender man that doing something like dropping his own son from the line of succession would be incredibly painful to him personally. He’d hate doing it. But it’s obvious the Queen has put the decision on his shoulders. Prince Philip may have bluntly told him he has to do it. William certainly probably has. It seems to be likely that this trip is to gird his loins for making a decision that may well end his relationship with his son for good. That’s tough and I have sympathy for Charles on this. The Windsors have always done what’s necessary to protect themselves and the institution though. Charles may not have inherited the ruthless streak George V showed with Tsar Nicholas and his family. But this trip gives me hope he’ll make the right decision anyway.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?