Harry and Meghan #80 Hazza's completely under Meg's thumb, have you always been this dumb?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
She's actually complained about not being able to take Archie to nursery or let him mix with other children because she's too famous - talk about delusional. I've said before, Kate manages to do the school run, pop into the local Sainsburys, was seen in the local Waterstones, etc. and she's married to and is the mother of future kings. Meghan just makes herself sound ludicrous by saying all this - I bet if she went out, dressed down and without loads of security around her like Kate does when she's not on duty, no one would take the slightest bit of notice of her. Everything she does is for maximum attention and 'look at me'. Look what she was like at Wimbledon when firstly she thought she was too important to follow the dress code so turned up in jeans so couldn't go in the royal box and then had the stand emptied and her security stopping people taking pictures of her, even though they weren't which was embarrassing!
This reminds me of something the British actor Richard E. Grant (of Withnail and I fame) wrote about in his diaries that were published in the early nineties. He spent part of the eighties immersed in the Hollywood scene off the back of Withnail and met or hung out with a lot of very famous actors and musicians, about whom he tells various anecdotes. He spent time with people as famous as Madonna, Steve Martin, Bruce Willis and Demi Moore at their peak, and went out with them to events and eateries etc, and he made a very astute observation - that even major A-listers are perfectly capable of going out and blending into a crowd to some degree and remaining fairly undisturbed - if they want to. Some such as Madonna really don't want to, and he made the point that he observed them engineering hysteria around themselves through the way they behaved in public. He contrasted going to an event with Madonna, who dragged an entourage with her, dressed like a movie star and went up to a balcony and leaned, practically hung herself over it to hit a spotlight and get the crowd's attention away from the act onstage (her own backing singer trying to start a career), to Bruce and Demi whom he met in a queue to go see one of their own films, who didn't get mobbed at all because they just dressed and acted normally.

Markle follows the Madonna pattern far as I can see. Engineer the appearance of celebrity and hope for attention to follow you. The photographer who spoke about her before she married Harry said she behaved like an A-lister with her entourage of 12 and stupid diva antics when she was a nobody in the business. Dragging a carful of security around a safe place like Montecito where stars are ten a penny and nobody bothers them fits the profile of someone who desperately wants attention, NOT privacy.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Haha
Reactions: 68
Woah I've just been on Twitter. I barely made it out alive. How is it that black people can insult, threaten and abuse white people, but it isn't racism? They are so angry. Genuinely I feel a bit shaky. 🥺I was only telling them to stop shaming Prince William's lack of hair! 😂🤣

I'm deleting my account. I am NOT going back there again!
What I find about these people (shouty, racist PoC) is that, the only people who appear to have a problem with their colour, is them themselves
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 28
😳🥺🥺🥴🥴. Yup, she knows exactly what she's doing!! She's dangerous!! 😳😳😳
It makes me sick that her fans think she’s this natural successor of Diana, I saw someone say that it’s ‘hauntingly similar’ well a) no it’s not bleeping similar in the slightest and b) Meghan’s lifelong obsession is Diana, it’s not really surprising that she’s managed to copy her to a T!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 25
Yes this is how it works. I’m not sure if you’re familiar with Critical Race Theory (CRT) which says black people can’t be racist because they don’t have the ‘institutional power’.

It’s disgusting, cult-like bollocks. I’ve seen the most foul anti white racist comments on Twitter. Re the Prince William ‘meme’ I’ve attached below, someone made a very good point (I can’t remember who sorry). They said if this was about a woman they’d say ‘don’t body shame Women’ ‘don’t age shame women’ etc. But wills is a straight white man so he’s fair game apparently.

Vile racism and misandry at play. What about William’s character? His maturity, good nature, intelligence, beautiful close family? No, he’s a straight white wealthy man, he must be the devil. Ugh.

Signed,
A perpetually irritated-and-angry-with-all-the-woke-tit woman.
View attachment 491902
Horrible cunts. Yet they love Hazzard..... Only because he's sticking his mickey into the palest person of colour ever . She's a person of colour alright.. white.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 28
Hiya Pom 👋👋. Thank you, I just fancied a change from the usual stuff, that's why I'm here. I enjoyed it though 🥰🤗😘
You know I always love your creations ❤❤❤
Thank you very much💖 🥰😃🤗😘 xx.
I am the same I managed to catch up alot of this thread and get though quite alot of pages 💕😘 xx.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 11
Thank you very much💖 🥰😃🤗😘 xx.
I am the same I managed to catch up alot of this thread and get though quite alot of pages 💕😘 xx
Me too Pom 🥰. It was very insightful I must say! 😮. I will try to keep up with this thread, its good 😀👍. Anyway it's late, so I'm going to bed now. Nighty night 🥰
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 12
Me too Pom 🥰. It was very insightful I must say! 😮. I will try to keep up with this thread, its good 😀👍. Anyway it's late, so I'm going to bed now. Nighty night 🥰
Yep, it's been interesting and hopefully it be going at a less faster pace so I can keep up lol 😄 Goodnight 💕😘 xx
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
Princess Margaret’s children seem to have been able to lead a very nice privileged life without all the problems I.e security, titles that Markles brings up obviously racism wasn’t a factor there but Harry isn’t the first spare, so sad what has become of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 30
In other news, the cute corgi names have been revealed.



hilarious comment!
I think Hazzo is still a UK citizen. I don't think he will try to get a green card. I was thinking maybe he needs a diplomatic or some sort of special visa/passport in order to avoid tax and to protect the RF accounts by extension? I am not exactly sure how the tax works for him, but I think the RF will go out of their way to give him some sort of special passport. RF might not give him more money but I don't see why they wouldn't do that for him. if that is really the case, then he is more of a c*** than I'd imagine. Your family is still trying to do everything to protect you (including taxes and other legal matters) and all he is doing is going around burning everything. What is Smeggy doing for him? Nothing but wasting the money.
Muick is a fresh water Loch on the Balmoral estate Aberdeenshire.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 24
I’ve got no business speaking for anyone else, but for my part...is there any way we can stop having the sugar tweets & IG crap posted? Some of us come here to escape all that.
Well you speak for me. I'm bored shitless reading people's experiences on twitter. I just don't give a rat's ass. :rolleyes:
It clutters up what was once a good sugar-free trans-free terf-free thread. If I want to read sugar shite I'll go look for it.
I'm biting my tongue, believe it or not.:censored:

Anyhoo, back on topic. Found this, from a guy who does specialist news stories, very niche stuff that involves actual work re digging and delving (important later in the post). Not mainstream and I doubt we'd recognise his name, even if he gave his real one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A basic tenet of news reporting is the Right to Reply. In other words, you cannot publish an allegation without giving the other party an opportunity to respond. Even if they say 'No comment' you've discharged your duty in that respect. But - and this is important - you cannot publish without a response.

But TV is slightly different. What happened on TV at the beginning of the week was one-sided and I'll politely describe some of what was said as dubious.

There was no immediate right to reply, nor did Winfrey come anywhere close to hard questioning - much less informed questioning. We got schmaltz-wrapped character assassination. I don't believe Markle because she's not believable. And not because of skin colour. I don't believe her because of her past record, a great deal of which is out there not too far from the surface of the internet. And there's only so much you can keep a cap on with injunctions and by being overly litigious.
Buckingham Palace, in some ways, gave the green light to some good, old-fashioned journalism (yes, it does exist). There's plenty out there on Markle and we may yet see some of it emerge in the coming weeks. It ought to.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Wow
Reactions: 70
Well you speak for me. I'm bored shitless reading people's experiences on twitter. I just don't give a rat's ass. :rolleyes:
It clutters up what was once a good sugar-free trans-free terf-free thread. If I want to read sugar shite I'll go look for it.
I'm biting my tongue, believe it or not.:censored:

Anyhoo, back on topic. Found this, from a guy who does specialist news stories, very niche stuff that involves actual work re digging and delving (important later in the post). Not mainstream and I doubt we'd recognise his name, even if he gave his real one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
A basic tenet of news reporting is the Right to Reply. In other words, you cannot publish an allegation without giving the other party an opportunity to respond. Even if they say 'No comment' you've discharged your duty in that respect. But - and this is important - you cannot publish without a response.

But TV is slightly different. What happened on TV at the beginning of the week was one-sided and I'll politely describe some of what was said as dubious.

There was no immediate right to reply, nor did Winfrey come anywhere close to hard questioning - much less informed questioning. We got schmaltz-wrapped character assassination. I don't believe Markle because she's not believable. And not because of skin colour. I don't believe her because of her past record, a great deal of which is out there not too far from the surface of the internet. And there's only so much you can keep a cap on with injunctions and by being overly litigious.
Buckingham Palace, in some ways, gave the green light to some good, old-fashioned journalism (yes, it does exist). There's plenty out there on Markle and we may yet see some of it emerge in the coming weeks. It ought to.
Oooooooh! *rubs hands in glee*. The stories will come out. If she thought she didn't have the protection from the RF before, she was well mistaken!
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Heart
Reactions: 40
But William is doing so much more than talking, and there is no evidence of Meghan actually following through on anything unless sending letters and notes count. Some people need to believe what they believe because it somehow validates their choices and thinking. I believe admitting you have made a mistake or were wrong about an opinion takes courage, and that shame and embarrassment will make people even more dogmatic.

An interesting article calling Meghan out on her lies in the OW interview. Apparently writing articles about Meghan is really paying off.
Wow, powerful stuff. Very enlightening and dare I say it ... some truths that might explain all the angst and weave ripping in some quarters.

:LOL::ROFLMAO::LOL: You are SO dead ! Hope you have a hard hat.:m
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 31
This is the whole woke issue. It doesn’t matter to them how she behaves. Anything she does is because white men are so nasty and she’s just a strong black woman living her truth. Disgusting cult like ideology
But a lot of other people have changed their opinion because of her behaviour.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 10
I am sick of the sight of them. Just completely peed off with their simpering faces being plastered everywhere every single day over and over.

Does anyone else want nothing more for them to disappear and never make their existence felt again? What a wonderful dream...
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 33
I’m not sure how good this looks? People and Sugars are going to say it’s just a PR move etc
View attachment 491821
It doesn’t matter what the RF do, the sugars will have a go. There is nothing the RF can do to appease them, they are so full of hatred and bias they can’t see straight. I think it’s a good move by the RF, at least it’s showing that they care enough to change things if it needs it. Personally I don’t think they have to change a damn thing, you and me both know the RF are far from being racist but it might shut some ppl up, but not the sugers, nothINg shuts that lot of idiots up.

And really who gives a flying f@@@ if it is a PR stunt, Megain isnt the only who can play at that game. The sugars are also calling Prince William article on sunday a PR stunt, so f@@@ what, I couldn’t care less if it is. Where in the PR rule book does it say only H&M can do PR stunts, it’s not just for those two losers to play that game.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
Reactions: 26
But a lot of other people have changed their opinion because of her behaviour.
Yes, amongst ordinary people, thankfully. But not the wokes, who I was specifically referring to. On social media most posts I see are still supporting her and pulling the race card
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.