Good next title there @BaguetteBest comment on the Mail's write up of today's reshuffle..
They should call their foundation 'Arrivals & Departures, nobody sticks around for very long!
ETA Interesting comment
It was said at the time of her hiring that she was on a one year prepaid contract, and many assumed that Charles was the one who paid. It's too embarrassing to admit she left as soon as her contract expired, because the Sussexes have extremely high staff turnover, so they came up with the face-saving "senior advisory" nonsense. Everyone in the business world knows that means she's gone.
AFAIK they have requested leave to appeal the judgement & that decision hasn’t been handed down yet. If they want to suspend publishing the apology/paying compensation they have to apply for a stay on those orders. if the CoA grant leave to appeal (iow agree that they’ll hear arguments) it’s likely all orders will be stayed until final judgement. If ANL win and Warby’s judgement is thrown out then all orders associated with it will be too. If they lose then all stays will be lifted.I thought the Mail had appealed and it will be heard on 6th April? Whether they have to print it at all? Apologies if this is posted further down the thread, am just catching up.
Beautifully writtenSomething like this perhaps (I found it more effective to send letter, because email contact was bogged down and email was just returned after 3 days):
Boris Johnson
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
Dear Mr Johnson
The monarchy exists only with the consent of the people and is accountable to the people through Parliament.
When do you plan to hold the Duke and Duchess of Sussex accountable for their treasonous disloyalty, as demanded by the overwhelming majority of the British people?
I respectfully request that you initiate action to remove Harry and his offspring from the succession. The justification for this is as follows:
Tempting as it may be to bury your head in the sand and keep passing the buck back to Her Majesty the Queen, this is no longer a purely private family matter. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have traduced not only their own family but also our constitution, the fabric of British socitety and the people of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. They have deliberately exposed us to vilification from around the world and incited division where previously there has been cooperation and commitment to improvement for the common good, of which we should be proud. They have justified this action with a catalogue of lies, cruelly brought before the public in the US and worldwide for maximum humiliation and personal financial gain. It is simply not acceptable that they should be permitted to do this from a position of British royal status.
Meghan and Harry have chosen for themselves a path which is incompatible with their retention of royal status. Royal status should be reserved for those individuals who assist the Monarch in fulfilling the Monarch’s role. That role is to sustain our hereditary constitutional monarchy, uphold our values (including integrity, free speech, fairness and natural justice) and act as the glue which binds us together within the UK and with the people of the Commonwealth, presenting our best face to the world and facilitating shared problem solving and mutual support. It is a role which necessarily comes with obligations and constraints – so, for example, it is by its nature a role which is in the public eye, which cannot be done in secrecy or under standard terms of employment, because it takes precedence over other interests. It cannot be combined with political activism, accepting freebies or making commercial deals for personal financial gain where conflicts of interest cannot be avoided. In return for this undoubtedly onerous commitment to public service, we bestow on royal persons significant wealth, privilege and opportunity.
Any and all persons with royal status should believe in the role, undertake the obligations with enthusiasm and be prepared to observe the inherent constraints. Harry and Meghan clearly do not – they have told us as much and that is their choice. The Queen, with the assistance of Parliament as necessary, should therefore remove all of their royal status – by which I mean titles, place in the succession (both Harry and his offspring), and any continuing funding from the Crown Estates or British taxpayer.
Yours sincerely etc
Megan would really have her knickers in a twist!! If this happenedBeautifully writtenbravo!
WonderfulSomething like this perhaps (I found it more effective to send letter, because email contact was bogged down and email was just returned after 3 days):
Boris Johnson
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
Dear Mr Johnson
The monarchy exists only with the consent of the people and is accountable to the people through Parliament.
When do you plan to hold the Duke and Duchess of Sussex accountable for their treasonous disloyalty, as demanded by the overwhelming majority of the British people?
I respectfully request that you initiate action to remove Harry and his offspring from the succession. The justification for this is as follows:
Tempting as it may be to bury your head in the sand and keep passing the buck back to Her Majesty the Queen, this is no longer a purely private family matter. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have traduced not only their own family but also our constitution, the fabric of British socitety and the people of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. They have deliberately exposed us to vilification from around the world and incited division where previously there has been cooperation and commitment to improvement for the common good, of which we should be proud. They have justified this action with a catalogue of lies, cruelly brought before the public in the US and worldwide for maximum humiliation and personal financial gain. It is simply not acceptable that they should be permitted to do this from a position of British royal status.
Meghan and Harry have chosen for themselves a path which is incompatible with their retention of royal status. Royal status should be reserved for those individuals who assist the Monarch in fulfilling the Monarch’s role. That role is to sustain our hereditary constitutional monarchy, uphold our values (including integrity, free speech, fairness and natural justice) and act as the glue which binds us together within the UK and with the people of the Commonwealth, presenting our best face to the world and facilitating shared problem solving and mutual support. It is a role which necessarily comes with obligations and constraints – so, for example, it is by its nature a role which is in the public eye, which cannot be done in secrecy or under standard terms of employment, because it takes precedence over other interests. It cannot be combined with political activism, accepting freebies or making commercial deals for personal financial gain where conflicts of interest cannot be avoided. In return for this undoubtedly onerous commitment to public service, we bestow on royal persons significant wealth, privilege and opportunity.
Any and all persons with royal status should believe in the role, undertake the obligations with enthusiasm and be prepared to observe the inherent constraints. Harry and Meghan clearly do not – they have told us as much and that is their choice. The Queen, with the assistance of Parliament as necessary, should therefore remove all of their royal status – by which I mean titles, place in the succession (both Harry and his offspring), and any continuing funding from the Crown Estates or British taxpayer.
Yours sincerely etc
I'm not clear on whether ANL have yet requested permission from the Court of Appeal, but Chris Ship has the best summary so far of today's legal news, including the all important font detailsAFAIK they have requested leave to appeal the judgement & that decision hasn’t been handed down yet. If they want to suspend publishing the apology/paying compensation they have to apply for a stay on those orders. if the CoA grant leave to appeal (iow agree that they’ll hear arguments) it’s likely all orders will be stayed until final judgement. If ANL win and Warby’s judgement is thrown out then all orders associated with it will be too. If they lose then all stays will be lifted.
That’s generally how it all works.
Wingdings would be betterThe silly tart doesn't even deserve Comic Sans.
Yes and Harry can have WordArt as he's childishWingdings would be better
As like her it makes no sense
Me too!!and I thought they'd employed Liz Hurley for a moment there!
Yes, they could always sent Hazno out on another merching errand.. on yer bike son!Maybe the Haznots will help pay it.....
Catherine St Laurent, their Chief of Staff, has been Markled! She's quit Archewell
Who is Catherine St-Laurent and why has she left Harry & Meghan's Archewell?
CATHERINE St-Laurent was the director of Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Archewell foundation. She took on the role in April 2020 but left after just one year. Here is what we know about her…www.thesun.co.uk
ETA. James Holt now Executive Director of Archewell according to the Telegraph.. Catherine is 'transitioning to a senior advisor role' (insert your own corporate b.s. translation here)
A spokeswoman for the Sussexes said St Laurent was “transitioning to a senior advisor role”. She confirmed that Mr Holt had been promoted to executive director of Archewell.
They know time is running out. They NEED those titles back or hazno has no substance, no meaning, no importance.Given that Scobie is the messenger, I believe this is most probably coming from Meghan with Harry hanging in the background, they think it will have more impact saying its coming directly from Harry. I also think it suggests they are not getting what they want, so they keep raising the stakes. I'd love to know what they are asking for. I wonder if there is an increasing sense of urgency to get their demands met before the bullying investigation, or maybe the big ask is to stop the investigation.
What does it mean? Nothing. It's word-swill. It's garbage. It's basically the Harkles' version of Nathan Barley.What does this mean? Its the agency that is going to be working with Archewell......Invisible hand....!!
But I dont know what a social impact and culture change agency is???
Invisible Hand is a social impact and culture change agency that harnesses the power of creativity and storytelling to propel the world forward.
The woke talk without meaning to their words.What does it mean? Nothing. It's word-swill. It's garbage. It's basically the Harkles's version of Nathan Barley.
A good looking woman like that is going to be gone in 3...2...1....Me too!!
Very pleased for you Hamster! Give him a few extra seeds and let him have a long run on the wheel as a treat !For the past year I've been muttering under my breath about how awful the Harkles are and slagging them off only to be met with indifference and my husband ignoring my rants. For many months the most response I've had is 'give it a rest'.
But finally my husband has seen the light and now agrees with mehallelujah!!!!!
He said that Hazno should be packed off to the Towerit's made my day!
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?