Some new info from yesterday Lady C
- medical professionals have said to her that H and M show many signs of being mentally unwell. M in particular has v strong indications of narcissistic and borderline personality disorder although have to meet people and know full history to diagnose properly. Mental illness etc deserves compassion but doesn't mean all perspectives are gospel
- like Lady C's mum, Meghan writes a lot of letters, in order to later have evidence to exonerate herself in a ploy of long term strategy - lady C thinks for example she always mentioned writing to the family to be of use Etc so that when she left, which she always planned, she had 'evidence' to show how devoted she was. She does like her evidence and to mention it at all stages, publically, even though sweet and caring, obv
- like hell was this the Sussexes last word on the matter
- the RF diaries are planned six months in advance, to highlight various causes that the palace gets behind, often personally shortlisted, but derived from apolotical, civil servant like palace institution, not to undermine anything by the government, but uplift national unity and international diplomacy
- when members are on a trip - always carefully planned with each engagement being meaningful and highlighting something important - general understanding that trip gets the media attention. And when royals have important speeches and points to make, others step back to give the press attention to that cause.
- Harry and Meghan didn't do this, they wanted their own image and attention to be headline irrespective of whatever causes others were trying to promote - no team spirit. They totally stole thunder from Charles' very successful tour in the Middle East. You see this all the time now in their constant need for press exposure eg letters this morning in smart works. She didn't even write letters just a sentence and her name?! God the desperation. Anyway the palace wasn't a fan of them doing this, and the Sussexes didn't like being told off - big source of problems internally , as they were keener to promote themselves than the causes the RF were meant to get behind
- Lady C is undoubtedly a snob but she generally is kind and intelligent. I really didn't approve of her references to good breeding in the sense aristocrats had good breeding - some of the most awful rude people are aristocrats. I think she means good upbringing, with certain manners and dignity. None of which markle has but not exclusive to aristocracy so that annoyed me!
- pointed out by psychiatrists that Meghan shows some self hatred - altering her appearance and openly getting confused about and having to reject half her identity as a teen and young actress, however now using that identity entirely to stage her world image. However this must conflict, and we are seeing her open battle with her conflicts happening on the world stage. Don't know how I feel about that analysis but I'm not a psychiatrist!
- just repeated patterns of petulance and victim narrative, constant constant need for exposure and inability to share spotlight, that every good act is about Meghan performing the good act rather than the charity or cause she is promoting. They release more information on the fact they have donated or written to charities than the work the charities do.
- how much help MM was given to teach her and help acclimatise, including Lady Susan who was a confidante and aid to Diana, as well as SamanthaCohen who was a very experienced and trusted palace aide
- the clear delight Meghan took in deception - for example her glee about a secret wedding ceremony - she is genuinely proud of this, and getting one over the stupid peasants (my analysis, the peasant bit
)
very good video, watch at twice speed though!!
www.weddingsabroadguide.com
(if it exists) I can only imagine it will backfire on whoever releases it.
