He's so unprofessional for a royal reporter
Its about time he starts acting like the pushing 40 man he is 
Harry and Meghan #78 Here’s the sting, the closest you’ll get to the Royals is Gayle “King”
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Its about time he starts acting like the pushing 40 man he is 
I don't see any difference between her acting roles and real life
OMG he is brilliant and sooooo true.I made a mess with my first link so now it's one I meant. Sorry
Wait, what!!
Meghan is 1/4 irish. I remember someone doing her genealogy before the wedding. It has never been mentioned since. I remember it caused a real jovial stir at the time because it was portrayed she was 1/4 WOC and 1/4 Irish.
As a genealogist I remember quickly looking and it's less than a 1/4 but considering the day that is in it, I shall go look for it.
Lovely video.
Happy St Patrick's day.
he knows exactly what he’s doing.Cuntface scrapie has just tweeted this:
'Bit confused here, so just want to get this new royal protocol correct. It’s okay when info is leaked to the papers via a palace source but not when Gayle King shares it on TV? Righty-ho then'
bleeping stirring little bleep. His stupidity knows no end. Remember everyone this is his true form
View attachment 486136
he’s stating that they leak stories as a fact. Him and Meghan both state that these are lies used to discredit her.
there’s no real way to know who leaks what (it at all). Journalists don’t reveal anonymous sources. Equally a newspaper could make up any story and cite it as a source.
scobie is staying the palace leaking as fact instead of attributing it to the media, all part of a running theme and effort to undermine ANY royal story - as obviously they rarely paint Meghan in a good light.
equally if the palace ARE leaking stories, it’s their only way of combatting Meghan or contradicting her. She and her cronies are undermining this in a mud slinging effort.
Honestly Omid, who hurt you, to the point you have zero selfesteem and resort to riding on the coat tails of a narcissist who treats you like a pet?
We don't want her!Wait, what!!
Meghan is 1/4 irish. I remember someone doing her genealogy before the wedding. It has never been mentioned since. I remember it caused a real jovial stir at the time because it was portrayed she was 1/4 WOC and 1/4 Irish.
As a genealogist I remember quickly looking and it's less than a 1/4 but considering the day that is in it, I shall go look for it.
Lovely video.
Happy St Patrick's day.
The Queen must have been so proud...
Agree, I keep thinking something very very bad (not just what they complained about) must have happened for this end result.
I think people quite liked her initially and as a future wife to Harry she was given a fair go. But us Aussies can sniff a faker a mile away, as can the rest of the world. She's a trashy big-noter and he looks as miserable as a bandicoot.
Snippets from an 'insider' about the Oz tour 2018..
What is Meghan, The Duchess of Sussex like in real life?
Agueda Sanchez's answer: Remember the Australia Tour? On the left, we have the lovely Lady Cosgrove, Prince Harry, Governor-General of Australia H.E. Peter Cosgrove, all the way to the right, standing out, Meghan. Before I continue, I have permission to post this info from someone very close to...www.quora.com
Good tea Aussie folks. I thank you muchly.
Concerning the alleged camera footage from the Wedding.
If somebody did record her, she going to sue right? I honestly can’t see any footage coming to light because the person that recorded it would surely be dragged through the judicial system for covert filming without permission?
I would love for it to emerge if true but can’t help but think the consequences wouldn’t be worth it.
If somebody did record her, she going to sue right? I honestly can’t see any footage coming to light because the person that recorded it would surely be dragged through the judicial system for covert filming without permission?
I would love for it to emerge if true but can’t help but think the consequences wouldn’t be worth it.
Meghan even turned on his book when it came down to it in court and said it wasn't factual. With respect to bullying complaints, it's not so much them leaking for palace PR, they're "leaking" personal stories about THEMSELVES because they're sick of seeing someone parade and perform their niceness and compassion when they're an outrageous witch. No one has sued the Times - these emails exist, and they precede Megxit. The Sussexes can spin it all they like, they're true.
for those who haven't, clue yourself up on Meghan's anonymous working actress blog. She's no naïve little mermaid and she's no woman's woman.
He's a horrible little plastic bastardHe's so unprofessional for a royal reporter
Rachel is the character Meghan played in Suits:
Well she definitely plays that part right!
suits.fandom.com
Well she definitely plays that part right!
Rachel Zane
Rachel Elizabeth Zane, J.D. is an attorney and former associate and paralegal at Specter Litt, the daughter of Robert Zane and the wife of Mike Ross. Rachel grew up under the shadow of her father, Robert Zane, a skilled lawyer and name partner of Rand, Kaldor & Zane. Despite her family's wealth...
I don't think it's for a certain class. I would loathe for my family goings on to be discussed in public and I imagine many people are the same. And I am definitely not upper class. You can tell just by looking at my back garden (NOT urban dictionary)
Smegma mentioned she knew Eugenie pre Harry and they were friends. Anyone have tea on this?
I bet that relationship soured pretty quickly.
Sure Megain you knew nothing about RF despite knowing Eugenie. Yeah...
In a YouTube interview that is still up MM is asked what she and her character have in common. She says she is very much like her character in suits, with the biggest thing in common being their ambition.Rachel is the character Meghan played in Suits:
View attachment 486161
Well she definitely plays that part right!
Rachel Zane
Rachel Elizabeth Zane, J.D. is an attorney and former associate and paralegal at Specter Litt, the daughter of Robert Zane and the wife of Mike Ross. Rachel grew up under the shadow of her father, Robert Zane, a skilled lawyer and name partner of Rand, Kaldor & Zane. Despite her family's wealth...
there you go, she warned us.
Not only has nobody even mentioned sueing The Times but there’s been no denial.
Yes she wanted to wear it, but HMTQ had promised it to Eugeine, and said NO . The actual tiara M wore for her wedding was a replica!! RF wouldn't trust her with he real thing
She can't be trusted, don't you know!!on MarkleNews instagram is an article where apparently a video of Meghan losing her tit during the wedding dress fitting has surfaced in Canada. an RPO was there and filmed it on his/her phone and the video has supposedly surfaced and is about to be dropped as a back up to the bullying claims. I remember reading somewhere that Jessica was present for one of the fittings and MM turned to Jessica saying "do you see what I have to put up with" when someone wasn't doing what Markle wanted. Oh how I would LOVE for witness statements!!!! I suspect as well the tea-throwing incident will come out
Can I get some group prayer going now to manifest these Oprah "WHATT" moments ? Oh how delish that would be if for each video or official witness release we get a "WHATT" (I dare not put an image/gif/video of HARPO as apparently that is digital blackface and racist).
No one does!We don't want her!
My point was very badly made but it was about how she plays up and plays down aspects of her ancestry when it suits her.
It was her 3 X great grandmother Mary Smith that came from Ireland. So a lot less than 1/4.
She moved to England and was a servant in Windsor Castle. Then she married an army officer Thomas Bird.
The rest is history as they say, I think Mary Bird is also her Malta connection.
Maybe that's why she was so opposed to Frogmore. Another family member in the servants quarters.
- Status