Haha sky news Australia don’t hold back do they! I wish our news stations were this direct about it
Last edited:
Picking a fight with a 94 year old woman is a new low.
Sky News Australia:
(4) Harry did not 'look at the family' before marrying Meghan - YouTube
"Prince Harry will need a lots of luck" (President Trump).
Hope so!Nah - it’s a tizzy right now, but how often do we think about Fergie and she was all over the papers when her misdemeanours came out.Also she doesn’t create real friends or real loyalty so as soon as they slip from their current heights all their supporters will melt away because she can’t do anything for them. They will be in their mansion crying racism not even seeing how privileged their lives are.
This is a long, excellent article. It pieces together events that many people brushed aside and makes a compelling narrative.
I also noticed the fact she brought up the bad behaviour to staff was from both of them not just Merkin. No wonder they're so desperate to try and get involved in the reviewThis is a long, excellent article. It pieces together events that many people brushed aside and makes a compelling narrative.
Such a difference in her speaking pattern when she’s talking normally too! Her answers in the Oprah interview are so scripted and delivered for the most dramatic effect.Even Patrick gets the evil glare here (at the 00:15 minute mark):
Meghan Markle's wedding guests worried about ‘uncomfortable chemistry’
MEGHAN MARKLE's wedding guests felt her close friendship with Suits co-star Patrick J Adams was a bit "uncomfortable", according to a royal biographer.www.express.co.uk
Perhaps he is using powerful to infer something else, like when some people (not me you understand) say that was 'brave' or 'bold' when I really mean 'WT actual F'. Only in my work life obvs.I've got two Charles and Di eggcups, and am a quiet royalist too. My budgie is also a quiet royalist. Not a noisy and placard-waving royalist like that Hamster we see on this thread, or that corgi who photoshops himself into State Banquets with our Queen
How can Sinking Chris Ship call this drivel from Patrick Adams "powerful stuff"? So the newest RF member is growing inside of her, is it?Gross. It's a plastic strapped on lump, you little squirt, and the bint you are defending is a human wrecking ball.
I think they should put out a statement which includes everything they did for the evil bitch, defend Kate and then bury The Hag with everything they have on her.There are some very astute peeps on this thread. And some who have worked in PR, I believe. What would you do if you were BP at this stage? I was trying to think what would be best way of handling it all. Silence doesn’t seem to work. Tit for tat PR press releases just lowers you to same level. What would be the best tactic?? Am not convinced they are handling this right- unless it’s still a case of let them self-sabotage spectacularly...
I totally agree with this approach bit think they should leave it to the paper's who are desperate to finish off them both. This moanfest is totally tone death in the current environment and apart from creating some gossip headlines, will quickly be forgotten. They're craving any headlines so I'd do nothing and just ignore them and let things slowly come out. They've pissed off the paper's and they're dying to sink them. Plus there's some seriously dodge behaviour around the charity money which alone will sink them.I think they should put out a statement which includes everything they did for the evil bitch, defend Kate and then bury The Hag with everything they have on her.
Its a bit early but I am going to get my consipiracy (tinfoil) hat on. What if its not Archie and they are using the photo to create the sense that he exists / is normal looking / acceptable for public consumption / just as a bloody distraction.So it definitely was Archiedoll and they are going to sue any paper that prints the photois this some new money making scam, tempt people and then pounce? What disgusting behaviour!
What about all the people who will be passing it around social media?
I’m Irish. Never in my life been interested in the Royal family, always considered myself a republican and still do but this BITCH has brought out the rage in me! It’s just a disgusting way to treat an elderly woman and her husband who has been seriously unwell in hospital. I’d be saying the exact same thing if it was my neighbours down the road. It’s actually nothing to do with them being royal for me, it’s just about common decency and normal, adult, respectful behaviour.Non Smegsy question: Just how many Irish people are here?
oh yes, and when anyone says a fashion choice is ‘brave’ it’s an unequivocal disasterPerhaps he is using powerful to infer something else, like when some people (not me you understand) say that was 'brave' or 'bold' when I really mean 'WT actual F'. Only in my work life obvs.
I don’t think it’s him because she looks different and there is no socialIts a bit early but I am going to get my consipiracy (tinfoil) hat on. What if its not Archie and they are using the photo to create the sense that he exists / is normal looking / acceptable for public consumption / just as a bloody distraction.
Note, they do not specificy what picture / photo they are referencing - its just 'a picture of archie that appeared briefly on social media.'
They do think they are too clevah by half most of the time so this would not surprise me at all.
I think its time for a cup of tea and a painkiller......
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?