We called it though, didn’t we? Tattlers predicted that Hazno would use his father’s illness as a way to try to weasel his way back in. ‘Temporarily’ step back into a royal role? Yeah, right. Once his feet were under the table he’d never leave. He couldn’t be a working royal again because everyone hates him, but he’d be back and expecting Pa to bankroll him. We bleeping knew he’d try it.
Does anyone know who is controlling the press and directing the party line that the reporters are following?
It is easy to issue a Palace statement indicating a course of action, or that something will
not happen, i.e. that the Sussexes have stood down and Harald cannot step in to help.
Just my opinion, but..
Harald didn't pitch up at the Palace and barge his way in. I think Chuck told him about his illness some time back, and invited him over. The bit about Camilla was chaff and she wasn't there.
Chuck is not vulnerable and helpless, being harassed by his son. Widespread suspicion and distrust mean that C must find a solution and it can only be with the Stoat. His illness presents as much an opportunity for him as for his son under guises like I love My Family / The Door will Always Be Open. The Stoats are not wanted or needed, they are menaces with royal perks but without the tiresome ribbon-cutting, but might moves be afoot?
C needs to sort out the Flatpacks and prevent the Sussexes further devaluing the Monarchy. Having cancer is unfortunate but irrelevant here, as what matters is that he and his son are complicit in the Flatpack scam. Any course of action or inaction taken by Chuck could be at William and Catherine's cost. I don't know what's going here on but something is. If there's a Big Reveal it will be about the children imo so they need to deal with it.
archive.ph
(sharing the meal below - the Harkles should really try it, they seem too hangry all the time)
www.mirror.co.uk
airmail.news
