Harry and Meghan #4 They're not OK it's official, but where is baby Archificial?

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
I don't think years, I don't think will last long
 
Reactions: 4
Touchè
 
Reactions: 6
I think they'll keep their titles but I have no idea how this is going to work.

I'm really interested to see how this pans out.
 
Reactions: 6
Harry is going to find out what normal peoples lives are like and he will wish he never gave up a life of privilege. For a narcissist.
 
Reactions: 10
We don't have to bow and curtsey to any Royalty, not even the Queen.

(extract from Telegraph article)

For as long as there have been kings and queens, their subjects have bowed or curtsied in their presence.
But one of the Queen’s most senior former courtiers has claimed that bowing and curtsying is “not necessary” and that Her Majesty is “very relaxed” about whether people do it or not.
Dickie Arbiter, who spent 12 years at Buckingham Palace and Clarence House as a press secretary, also says in a new memoir that it is a myth that people must wait for the Queen to speak first when they meet her.
In On Duty With The Queen, Mr Arbiter says that such customs were mostly “made up by courtiers over the centuries, and retained for whatever reason. Regardless, what may have befitted the social mores of the 18th or 19th centuries wasn’t necessarily right for modern times.
“Bowing or curtsying when in the presence of a member of the Royal family? Not necessary. Not unless one chooses to.”
 
Reactions: 2
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.