Trying to portray the “I’m amazing in the sack” , bed head
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Because Megz and Harry would have called their lawyers by Saturday lunchtime
Oh, yes I saw that story on the Dominic Lawson article in the mail.
Prince William is an aide de camp for the Queen and has some gold braid on his uniform.
Harry had a hissy fit that he wasn’t one, so was given the same »honour » a few months later.
Honestly he is a spoilt brat.
Even basic things like he is allowed to have a beard when he is uniform.
it’s normally against the rules in the military, and he looks scruffy; whereas William looks <swoon> in uniform.
Last edited:
Oi! Trailer Trash have standards.
Taz spoke about this. So she can fiddle with her hair, to show off the jeweller ( bracelets, earrings etc) she is merching.
Her hair pre RF was tidier.
Well done. A perfect illustration of the deployment of that allegation to suppress the expression of ideas you neither agree with nor understand.Typical.
Oddly enough they never elaborate on that alleged theme. The other 'go to' is "I don't understand the negativity toward her". I mean they read this thread, they've said so and we can recognise names ... with all the evidence of her perfidy, reams and reams of her sneakiness, her lying, her manipulation, all laid out clearly in links and videos. Not just our opinions, but facts that speak for themselves... and then trot off to post that they don't understand the negativity toward her in here and that the royals are cunts anyway and deserve her pissing on their cornflakes.
Also how does drawing attention to a group of people distract attention from what one of them might have done. I dont think a career in crisis management beckons unless the Sussexes have a vacancy in their team which must already be larger than his IQ.
Last edited:
I bloomin love it
x
By all accounts she's had enough practice
A good read, as usual. I didn't realise that the Invictus Games she turned up to were a month or so after their alleged 'secret' engagement (I don't keep a timeline, maybe I shouldLatest Harry Markled
‘Finding Freedom’ ~ The Extracts Review
The Times decided to print extracts from ‘Finding Freedom’ by Scobie and Durand, but was it a wise move? Readers moaned and complained for this is the kind of book suited more for The S…harrymarkle.wordpress.com
). This really is puzzling, because from the photos it really didn't look like a devoted couple at that point, although obviously he was there in an official capacity, so had things to do.Just a little preview of tomorrow when I gather the Mail have revealed that Judgment will be "handed down" in the injunctive application to restrain naming of their 5 "letter" Winesses.
Usually this happens: The Judgment will have been sent to the Barristers for both parties late yesterday afternoon. This is on the strict understanding that neither it nor its conclusions will be dislcosed any further. Although in Practice the Barrister tells the solicitor and they sort of hint at the outcome to the client "Its not gone entirely our way..." This is to allow the Parties representatives to try and agree consequential directions. These will be about the conditions either of the imposition of anonymity or its relaxation; or if either party Appeals what happens until the Appeal is heard. If either party Appeals the Court has to give leave which if they refuse (because they think an Appeal is hopeless) the losing party then has to make another Application to another judge for leave to Appeal. You can see why its all so absurdly expensive.
Speaking of which, also costs. The losing party will usually pay the winning parties costs of the Application which are usually assesed on the spot, and payable in weeks, although if they are very large and its complex they can be assesed by yet another specialist Court. It might also be that this hearing is where the Judge disposes of the apparently unresolved issue of who pays the costs of the Application lost in May, which would make sense.
Anything the parties cant agree will be determined at tomorrows hearing and whoever loses those arguments will also pay all or part of the costs of that hearing.
So Meghans perfect week could continue with game over on protecting the naming of her Witnesses and two expensive adverse costs orders. We can but hope.
Usually this happens: The Judgment will have been sent to the Barristers for both parties late yesterday afternoon. This is on the strict understanding that neither it nor its conclusions will be dislcosed any further. Although in Practice the Barrister tells the solicitor and they sort of hint at the outcome to the client "Its not gone entirely our way..." This is to allow the Parties representatives to try and agree consequential directions. These will be about the conditions either of the imposition of anonymity or its relaxation; or if either party Appeals what happens until the Appeal is heard. If either party Appeals the Court has to give leave which if they refuse (because they think an Appeal is hopeless) the losing party then has to make another Application to another judge for leave to Appeal. You can see why its all so absurdly expensive.
Speaking of which, also costs. The losing party will usually pay the winning parties costs of the Application which are usually assesed on the spot, and payable in weeks, although if they are very large and its complex they can be assesed by yet another specialist Court. It might also be that this hearing is where the Judge disposes of the apparently unresolved issue of who pays the costs of the Application lost in May, which would make sense.
Anything the parties cant agree will be determined at tomorrows hearing and whoever loses those arguments will also pay all or part of the costs of that hearing.
So Meghans perfect week could continue with game over on protecting the naming of her Witnesses and two expensive adverse costs orders. We can but hope.
Last edited:
Thank you Auntie. We would be lost without you, I know little of how it all works in the legal stratosphere, apart from that it is, as you say, absurdly expensive.
thanks Aunty Legal @antinoos
however head is spinning with the Legalease.
please could someone translate into plain English for me?
The Princeling has no shame. What an absolute and complete insult to any other person who has worked above and beyond to receive that honour.
One prob -not sure he can write tho?
PS Not that I have any sympathy, but you can see just why people operating at David Sherbournes level earn their money and often burn out in the process. He has been fighting for Johnny Depp all week, preparing the next days cross examination and submissions overnight; and tomorrow with less than 24 hours notice he has to take instructions from Meghan, prepare and then spend yet another very difficult day in court arguing with another Oxford Double-First who put simply wants to humiliate and kill him....
I didn't know this about the braids - thanks! His sense of entitlement really is something else!! What a spoilt brat
With every revelation I just think they really do deserve each other.I'm intrigued because I know all of you are easily smart enough to understand it if its not full of arcane gobblydegook which I do try very hard to avoid so please let me know what is not clear and I will try again. I'm not being funny it genuinely would help me. I might write something about this case...
Mind you my second paragraph is a bit glutinous:
Basically the Judge has made a decision in writing about whether or not the Five Witnesses can be named. Tomorrow the losing party will have to decide whether to try and get permission to Appeal the decision; and both parties will argue the toss about what it means in practice and who pays for all these expensive Applications. Usually the loser pays the winner.
Last edited:
About this Aunty, the case surely hinges on the fact that the famous five were integral in the debacle. How can they, as key witnesses, be anonymous? As a lay person I kind of can’t see how they can be kept private. It’s been made such a public issue it’s now in the public interest to know who we are dealing with. I’d love to be a fly on any of their walls
Worth their salt indeed!
Last edited:
I’m sure Meghan can write it down for him and he can copy it in his best handwriting (which won’t be as pretty as Meghan’s, of course).One prob -not sure he can write tho?
I thought Meghan wanted their identities kept secret up until the point they had to give evidence, cos the mail/all media would doorstep them and their families, publish everything they could find out?About this Aunty, the case surely hinges on the fact that the famous five were integral in the debacle. How can they, as key witnesses, be anonymous? As a lay person I kind of can’t see how they can be kept private. It’s been made such a public issue it’s now in the public interest to know who we are dealing with. I’d love to be a fly on any of their walls
Worth their salt indeed!
- Status