Harry and Meghan #303 Kiss Meg's shoes or I'll release book two!

[Thalia]

Regarding the Coronation, they should be invited and welcomed with open arms...

...but it would be unfortunate if His Majesty's Customs and Excise drug sniffer dog signalled the pair so they had to be detained while their private plane, and everything on it, was forensically taken apart. They'd also need to wait for blood screening results and be subjected to full cavity body searches.

I would expect that investigation would take, at a rough guess, until the Coronation and attendant celebrations had ended.

That would be a shame

 

[wibble]

And if Rishi does it, it would knock on the head the constant bilge of racist Britain.

It won't.
The usual suspects will call him coconut or whatever.
And bleat on about whiteness and his unconscious bias.

 

[da1sycha1n]

Thanks @planetmirth And @JAR21 . Will not read the book, but does the book witch about how they were victimised at the Jubbly? Sested in the 2nd row, that sorta tit?

no it doesn't cover the Jubilee

 

[MeInMidAmerica]

When I opened my Ipad, this was the top story on Yahoo News…from MSN…’woke-friendly…so not surprised at that.

Who might be inventing this garbage?

Just focusing at different targets from day to day. This one us for those who may still like K. Evil monarchy needs H to transform it to save it.

MSN

 

[265]

Regarding the Coronation, they should be invited and welcomed with open arms...

...but it would be unfortunate if His Majesty's Customs and Excise drug sniffer dog signalled the pair so they had to be detained while their private plane, and everything on it, was forensically taken apart. They'd also need to wait for blood screening results and be subjected to full cavity body searches.

I would expect that investigation would take, at a rough guess, until the Coronation and attendant celebrations had ended.

That would be a shame

That or the Pilot "accidently" landed in Bermuda.

 

[Hula flight]

WTF???? Eeewwee

 

[Ubu1uk]

Perspective .
In her defense :

So Kelly reached the pinnacle of Britishness by loyally serving the Queen , getting a order, being seen with her, interacting with her...
It's not arrogance , it's a bit of pride.
Doubt that anyone can change anything about her status, she's part of the Queen's will.
So if she's gone from her position (lost all access ) , it;s because Kate, Camilla etc have and had somebody else dealing with tiaras , and not because Charles took the keys away, that's not how it works.
See also Harry's claim about Peg's tiara trial.

I agree about the locks, as I pointed out to my friend at the time this happens when the Monarch dies as does all the servants losing their jobs. My friend was a big fan of Kelly hence me buying the book but she just didn’t like her personality as displayed in the book.

 

[penpitstop]

Maybe I’ve picked it up wrong but when the daily Mail printed their address in the fortified, highly secure borrowed mansion on Vancouver island they had to flee. But when the daily Mail printed the address of their “heavily discounted” mansion in SB (which I’m sure didn’t have the same protection) they stayed put. Why does nothing with this pair of nobodies make sense!!!!!!!

 

[LuluBanks]

Just like the accusations against the Palace of ''discrimination '' or similar , nobody would advocate for a foreigner joining ones military (unless Foreign Legion) or one becoming President, or prime minister.
Sometimes even citizenship without a clear cut from foreign association isn't a guarantee of loyalty .

Wasn’t Prince Philip of Greece in the navy before renouncing his title and getting British citizenship? And the British royal family had German titles until 1917 when they renounced them due to anti German sympathy in WW1. Hence Princess Victoria of Battenberg becoming Marchioness of Milford Haven.

A big question is what is the purpose of the monarchy? Is it merely symbolic? Does it operate under the foreign service? I think the degree of transparency ought to reflect its function. At the end of the day, they are public employees who work for the people of the UK (of which I am not included). As an outsider, I would think that the British people would want full transparency and the ability to strip royal members of titles when they are no longer found to be appropriate representatives of the nation. In other words, the people should be able to force Charles to strip Harry of any royal title and let him live a je ne sais quois life as his son, Mr. Harry Mountbatten Windsor.

 

[VC10]

WTF???? EeewweeView attachment 1884861

Hahahahaaa, cheap old hoe

 

[Evangelina]

He is a danger to the Wales family.
Elements of US media claimed that George is ''Spare.''

A mentally unwell , logically incompetent , and Monarchy uninitiated individual may understand this as following :
If all 3 children are ''spare'' than the next King after a killed William instead of just Regent (no Act changes so far) would be Harry.
Vs:
Harry's temporary importance for a few years (no Act changes so far) as Regent until George is King.

The '' temporary importance '' of Harry is less worth of a crime, than the ''security'' of George is ''Spare'' and Harry is King.(in a mindset , understanding of a deranged fan of ideologue .)

There are precedents, when misunderstandings of media information killed innocents, even when the reporting was factually objective.
All one needs is a troubled mind, or ideology .

 

[DarnIt]

I don’t want them anywhere near the Coronation.You just know that conversations will be recorded for future use, no matter if they play nice at the time. I also dislike the thought that their bad behaviour gets rewarded.You can guarantee that they would see this as their story being validated.
I understand that KC loves his son, and I truly feel for him.If some kind of private and personal compromise was reached between family members, then that would be a different matter.But that’s not what Harold wants.Harold wants total capitulation, public apologies, and a couple of cushy tax payer funded jobs where he can strut on the world stage.He also wants his family to be publicly shamed.
If he gets any concessions I will be disgusted.

i just wonder if anyone records the Smarkles chit chat?
Long distance microphones? Intercepted calls?
Obviously there will be unused stuff, bloopers & outakes in the Netflix vaults.
I reckon that they are remarkably circumspect as they chat, prolly have a soundproof room so no-one can eavesdrop as they hatch their plans & review progress.

As Smeg is weirdly quiet at this time, very little is leaked from Montecito HQ even though they are not universally liked.
It is all so controlled.

 

[planetmirth]

no it doesn't cover the Jubilee

Have you read it @da1sycha1n ?
I’ve just finished part 1..interest waning but want to see if a seachange come part 3.

 

[Ndrangheta]

I believe so too. Lawyers are now working frantically behind the scenes. Conversations, letters, meetings - all take time. People involved will be receiving advice on how to do things by the book in the correct and legal ways. There's no rushing these processes, justice requires patience.

There's an old saying: Revenge is a dish best served cold, not via a six part Netflix series.

 

[toninottony]

Just seen a rumour on Quora that the Markles (led by Thomas Jnr) are planning to make a documentary of their own that'll be fun

Not a rumor Thomas markle junior talks about it on his you tube channel

 

[DanDanTheIceCreamMan]

Regarding the Coronation, they should be invited and welcomed with open arms...

...but it would be unfortunate if His Majesty's Customs and Excise drug sniffer dog signalled the pair so they had to be detained while their private plane, and everything on it, was forensically taken apart. They'd also need to wait for blood screening results and be subjected to full cavity body searches.

I would expect that investigation would take, at a rough guess, until the Coronation and attendant celebrations had ended.

That would be a shame

I'd quite like to see them in a separate pen to everyone else, kind of like visiting football fans at the height of hooliganism.

 

[Churchill's Ghost]

When I opened my Ipad, this was the top story on Yahoo News…from MSN…’woke-friendly…so not surprised at that.

Who might be inventing this garbage?

Just focusing at different targets from day to day. This one us for those who may still like K. Evil monarchy needs H to transform it to save it.

MSN

Um. Charles secured the crown at birth…all he had to do was literally stay alive

 

[DanDanTheIceCreamMan]

WTF???? EeewweeView attachment 1884861

Oh, so the sun does shine out of her....... oh....

 

[ResidentMerkin]

There also wasn't any mention of her alleged suicide either nor of the RF are racist comments they said on Oprah

Anything on Harpo or Tyler at all? Or the UN trip? Or the US veteran NY intrepid trip? There or on the documentary? Therebis sooo much still that they could annoy us with

 

[Blessmyheart]

No he isn’t. He’s a curious mix of traits - growing up in the RF almost guarantees that you’re going to have some issues. He has obviously known nothing but material privilege but he was relentlessly, hideously bullied at school and it traumatised him so much he still carries it. All his life he’s been mocked by everyone from his uni peers to the press to his own ex-wife. He’s prone to self pity as a result which Camilla has helped him with - she patiently listens and has settled that side of him down. He’s also used to the world revolving around him, is pedantic and spoilt. But his own issues have made him incredibly sympathetic to others’ woes which was the driving force behind the Princes Trust. He’s rather overly sensitive but is generous and very loyal to his friends, encouraging to his staff, and dutiful and hard working to a fault. He’s a long long way from perfect but I think he is fundamentally a good man who cares a lot.

The Harkles do however, between them, match every single narc trait:

View attachment 1884766
View attachment 1884767
View attachment 1884768

I wish I could put into words how much I admire your post.It is fair, accurate and true.Charles has made mistakes, some more damaging than others, but never made from a place of malice.He never sought to hurt anybody.Unlike his younger son.