Harry and Meghan #303 Kiss Meg's shoes or I'll release book two!

[JAR21]

A 'friend' has bloody refaced me on their engagement press intro and a bit of the wedding

 

[carolinew]

But if KC and POW really wanted peace at all costs, I think they would have made that invitation happen.

Question…is there some option where H is excluded totally from participating in the ceremony and he and M have no ‘inside’ seats. (Because they are no longer part of the family business) ….BUT are publicly extended an invitation to join any PRIVATE family function held afterwards?

Yikes - who would get the short straw and have to sit next to them? Not poor Sophie again. Could put Meghan at the end of a table next to the Duke of Kent.

 

[LadyMuck]

Angela Levin on gb news at 9.20 discussing Clarkson's dismissal despite his apology

 

[LadyMuck]

Princess Ann at King Constantine funeral today

Princess Anne looks sombre as she attends King Constantine's funeral # via https://android.com

 

[Meemew]

He would be absolutely stupid to leave the Harkles the run of his house unfettered - the staff not shoved in & still floundering in the pool would have run for the hills.

Where did this ‘They’re at the Fosters’ nonsense come from? Because the only people who think they are still tight with the Fosters are Sugars.

 

[Cinnamon.girl]

A few serious ones by me with sources.
The trouble with human interest, the importance of media in ''propaganda'' which is a word mostly associated with politics, governments but actually is a media element.
MSM and SM(regardless what (example) I say, if theorists don't copy, reframe it, or the MSM it's irrelevant )

So here:

TOM BOWER: Palace must hit back to win over the under thirties

Adhering to the Palace's maxim of 'Never complain, never explain', courtiers insist that the best answer to the torrent of vitriol is to say nothing. I believe they are making a terrible mistake.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Tom Bower:
'' But he faces a huge task at a time when social media tries to dictate public opinion and when there is a powerful narrative that Harry is the ‘victim’ of an uncaring father, a hostile elder brother and a ‘dangerous’ stepmother. ''
....

Right now the idea that every theorist out there that claims via human interest(''insider ,'' ''source,'' claims, appeal to fandom (individual or Monarchy) appeal to anti fandom (dislike or outright hatred of the Harkles) is actually who they claim to be is ...dangerous.

The gray concept is based on a sponsor (the side which benefits and is the instigator) posing as a proponent of the ''liked'' side while spreading information that will at the end (with human interest) actually implicate , damage the-liked side, if nothing else-by association .
No, the disliked side will not suffer any damage, they are either sufficiently damaged already, or untouchable via ''apologism,'' even when ignoring certain MSM interest in taking down the liked side.

Regardless of the BS I'm spewing here, trust your gut, and follow the logic of ''association via named location.''

Trying to decode your as-ever enigmatic post.

"Tom Bower:
'' But he faces a huge task at a time when social media tries to dictate public opinion and when there is a powerful narrative that Harry is the ‘victim’ of an uncaring father, a hostile elder brother and a ‘dangerous’ stepmother. ''

Not surprised Chuck faces a "huge task" with countering the powerful SM narrative that the Stoats are "victims", given that we've not heard a peep out of him except that the Stoats are much loved and overseas. What did he expect? Social Media is very powerful and the Stoats have used it ruthlessly to promote their false narrative while the RF through choice have never contradicted them.

Now the Stoat has outed himself as half brain-dead (allegedly, I'm not 100 sure) and handed an armoury of weapons to his Ho. Everything that's wrong with the Stoat is the fault of the RF.

I understand what you say about people posing as one thing but are another.
But could the serious matter of the alleged violence accusations change all this? Before that the Stoat was possibly already "sufficiently damaged or untouchable" but surely this takes him and the RF into dangerous waters - if it comes out - and he will no longer be untouchable? The Ho still will be, even more so.
I've probably totally missed your point, in which case could you put me straight? thank you!

 

[wibble]

That explains it...

 

[toninottony]

Too many people I know are watching with enjoyment the dysfunction in the royal family like one watches a train wreck.
I think Charles and the rest of the family are actually worried about what would happen if Harry actually went full blown racial justice and compensation on them. If they did that, huge swaths of the country and the world would be delighted by that message and it honestly would get the Mountbattens of Montecito the attention and platform they crave. Perhaps that is what Harry is thinking of when he’s saying he hasn’t called the royal family racist. There’s an implied yet.

Won’t work already strongly implied in a way won’t work again

 

[Verfugbar]

Had one of those thoughts that ambushes, what if we are underestimating their ambition and delusion & they actually want to become gods?
It would explain the tedious wanking on they do about wanting The Commonwealth, and the DofE managed it.

Prince Philip movement - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

(The Wikipedia link possibly explains the dancing at their wedding nonsense, as when told about the twat’s wedding by a travel agent (notified by The Times - obviously to stir up racism) “they hoisted the Union Jack, danced, and ate pigs.”)

 

[stuffandnonsense]

I was just about to post this - I read both years ago and am going to dig them out again. If I remember, neither really slags off the family

I have to confess I’ve read neither but I’ve read about them and Traitor King. (I love history) From what I have gleaned you are correct they didn’t disparage the RF. it appears in many ways that he really wanted back in, to be seen to be part of it. Those were different times, victimisation and race would not have been tolerated. We were afterall recovering from a War

 

[DarnIt]

Congratulations on becoming a VIP @Murphy Brown, unfortunately I feel you are setting your sights a bit high asking for Beluga ..... how about a tuna buttie and a sausage roll thrown in for good measure? I have also been to Poundland for some madeira cake for afters but, and this is the icing on your cake, I walked past the Oxfam shop on the way back to the VIP lounge and there, in the window, was a copy of the fastest selling non-fiction book in history ..... priced £2 !!!!! I splashed out and bought it for you to mark this momentous occasion ....... enjoy!
P.S. Bring your own booze, I'm not made of money!

Spare: possibly the fastest remaindered book…in the world.

 

[Happy Lady]

@JAR21 did you save a copy of BP announcement saying a surrogate was used? I've failed to find it. I can't remember whether the notice was for Arch or Lidl, or both.

 

[BlinkyBill]

OMG so Clarkson apologised by email BUT thats still not enough for them.
They say his 'hate rhetoric' needs to be addressed
Bloody hypocrites

Unbelievable!!

 

[265]

Carole Malone not holding anything back.....

'Don't expect Harry to do decent thing, he doesn't know what it is'

Prince Harry is now expected to be invited to the Coronation on May 6. Why for goodness sake? This treacherous little scrote should be banned not just from the Coronation but from every royal event in the future.

www.express.co.uk

Carole makes sense and makes me wonder if H&M should turn up or not, I think it's a case of dammed if they do, dammed if they don't!
Yes they can come and collect information then whinge like fuckery or they are not allowed to come so they will whinge like fuckery! It's a
no win situation, also it's a state event which means it's paid by the Taxpayer. Carole thinks that the RF shouldn't have the final say in who
comes or not, I'm not sure I agree.

 

[da1sycha1n]

Just seen a rumour on Quora that the Markles (led by Thomas Jnr) are planning to make a documentary of their own that'll be fun

yes seemingly for October of this year

 

[LadyMuck]

Smeg was a serial cheater. Aka puck bunny. Trevor was her 2nd husband

 

[4FoxAche]

So we'd had a day without any mention of them and then along comes Jez

Tbf though I braced myself loading DM website for this pair and was met with the headlines about that police force monster.

Actually wanted Haz back.

 

[LadyMuck]

Duchess of Narsussex. Harkles are not invited. W and the sausage

 

[thenorthremembers]

This it, in a nutshell. Oh dear Harry...

Velociraptor that’s a good one

 

[Allflightscancelled]

View attachment 1886069

I genuinely thought this was a halloween pic - it isn’t.

Bloody hell

I know this is vacuous. But please, can’t someone give than a lesson in applying makeup?