da1sycha1n
VIP Member
you could see that from her mannerism in the Harry shush video! there was no conviction in it, actions speak louder than words!
you could see that from her mannerism in the Harry shush video! there was no conviction in it, actions speak louder than words!
This is odd, as The Times said they had the information from a Senior Palace Source. I wonder if there's been a U-turn, or KC has floated the story to gauge public reaction as he has a habit of doing? Roya Nikkhah is The Times Royal Correspondent and I don't understand how she can have got this so completely wrong with quotes etc. She looks a fool with this false story and surely would never have run it just on the Stoats say-so without checking with the Palace? Especially after all the Stoat lies? It doesn't add up.There will be no reconciliation talks.
I am so disappointed! I wanted to see what frock horror she would turn up wearing and how many layers of fake tan.
One woman claims she was his girlfriend at the time and another his fiancee plus a daily mail reporter RK spoke to her several times she alerted the media to where she wasThis was the chain of events that led to the fatal accident.
As much as everyone wants to put the full blame on the RF.
Diana took the offer up to go to Al Fayed's villa in France with her son's, knowing she had no royal security or protection.
Instead of focusing on her boys (which was what she was there for apparently), she decided to start a relationship with Al Fayed's son, who had just dumped his girlfriend, to go running after her.
And from all accounts, she was still upset by the break up from the heart surgeon but quickly moved on to Dodi as soon as he showed interest.
If she had just focused on what was important at the time, and less about men, she would probably be here today.
The ransom in other words.those numbers started circulating last week. IMO thats TW putting out her price to release Harold.
God, do you know I never even thought of that! As rumours go it isn't impossible or even unlikely that she might have had a bit of 'time' with Andrew. I mean, they would have had the opportunity, she had lots of affairs and Andrew was/is alllways at it. Well, wouldn't that be interesting if it was true!!!Lordy, imagine if he did turn out to be Andrew's. That would be one for the ages.
View attachment 1885876
On what do you base your opinion? In what way is Camilla mentally or physically unfit to be QC? Details please.Charles knew what skeletons he was bringing to the Throne, but with his mixture of stubbornness and vanity he may cling on with Camilla, who I personally don't think is mentally or physically fit to be QC. I always wondered why HM stayed on so long.
yes- have been saying the same thing for a while now.... also, for a Todger who complains endlessly about *leaks,* he has his nerve in publishing such tripe..... the Dastardly Duo is obviously working hand-in-hand with reporters to publish their projected/wishful manifestations on a nearly daily basis.Oh for pete's sake, the reconciliation rumors are just like
Will present an Oscars/invited to oscars
Invited to Obama's birthday party
Will meet with female senator leaders
Will be invited to state dinner before Her Majesty's funeral
Will appear on the balcony at Jubilee
blah blah blah.
The irony of haz demanding the family meeting to be private does not escape anyone. (Hoping they can lie about it with impunity)
I think they will come to the Coronation and be well managed as they were at the Jubilee, second row in the center, behind the candle However, I suspect if they miss their ride, they will be stuffed into the tower until it's over. I think it will be delicious to watch KC and QC be crowned with perfect pomp and circumstance, to see PW in his uniform with all the accoutrements participate in an important role, as stunning PC in a glittering tiara watches and fuming haz and gurning smeagol will be boo'd by the happy crowds. Not carriage rides, no balconys, completely snubbed and ignored by the rest of the RF.
He's not quite fat enough to be Andrew's, in all honesty. And his tits are too big.God, do you know I never even thought of that! As rumours go it isn't impossible or even unlikely that she might have had a bit of 'time' with Andrew. I mean, they would have had the opportunity, she had lots of affairs and Andrew was/is alllways at it. Well, wouldn't that be interesting if it was true!!!
I put Diana in Regency period, I think she was the type and that she was brought up that way: have "high" social life, no carrier, no higher education, and finally excellent marriage.Yes, she was a bad mother for a wide variety of reasons, some of them:
Her belief that she is a superior because ''kindergarten '' work, and the complete lack of understanding that a regular aristocratic child and a Royal child which will end in the public eye for life are not the same.
The smugness of her being ''warm'' while others are cold.
She didn't understand the ''creation process '' of Royal children,-there must be a public persona and a private child, she mocked those that lived it before (other Royal women) which gave the world headlines ''William the Tantruming'' and ''William the Basher.''
As we see now, these get used against him, and would be even if he was the most zen person on the planet ,(media)
The ''uncles''
Affairs are one thing, usage of children as ''front'' for affairs are another.
See Spare and kids watching ''courtship '' of another uncle. (St. Tropez)
Carling ''teaching rugby'' and Hewitt , well riding , mostly Diana in hay of Baracks.
Even without the above, the way to early indroductions to ''uncles'', the witnessing of ''break ups'' and the general lack of stability would under normal circumstances give the other parent lots of leverage during custody establishment .
She was a egomaniac , she wouldn't ''improve'' her skills, because she did it ''right.''
She did things intentionally to create problems for the Monarchy it didn't matter if mocking protocol with mismatching gloves , or parenting the children as a form of one upmanship against the RF.
Of course the ''narratives'' her ''sainthood '' are something else.
The luurve, warmth, hugging , the kissing , the jumping on beds are clearly a successful ''polish'' and universally appealing to the emotivist mainstream but the reality is that Charles did similar things, with a difference :
-He didn't reach sainthood
-He maintained the public persona (mostly) towards his children when in public.
The childrens manipulation , the negativity and the (by today's standards ) parental alienation elements are clearly visible .
William succeeded at a certain point in seeing the ''intent'' behind her ''love'' love which would absolutely escalate when it was Charles turn to (have the kids) or do even basic parenting (see history 101, of ''superior '' vacations , ''superior'' outings as documented, always conveniently leaked, to outdo the other parent, leaked by her side)
Harry is now using these things against the RF. Contrary to popular belief he is aware of Diana's games (it was clear in school for him) but ...there is a Monarchy to attack , so it's useful .
Just like mummy.
Bloody perfect.
Apart from being in Fiction, I like the book titles on the right that make a complete phrase:
Is Charles a narcissist? It’s awful, the family is riddled with personality disorders.My belief is that the stories of reconciliation are far from truth. On one side is part of the Palace narrative - they keep saying it since the Queen's funeral. On the other we know that it keeps the Harkles on the press. So both sides can be leaking it in a way or other, and they will be around until some sort of understanding is in place - can't see that happening soon, while Harold is still married. However we think that KC3 is being weak - I think he has been weak with Harold as he was growing up, don't think he is being weak now - we must not forget that KC3 is a narcissist as well, who waited 74 years to be a King. I think he likes it more than he shows and he will not jeopardise his position for anyone, and sure not for a traitor of a son.
That said, he might be measuring the pulse of the nation with these stories. Trying to understand how he is seen as a father and as a King - and if you read the comments, it's pretty clear the overall sentiment regarding the theme.
I think, for KC3, the family door is open for Harold, without TW and with discreet paid for existence. I really believe - and I hope I am not wrong - the door of the institution is forever closed for all of the Harkles.
He was probably fiddling the expenses - the same goes for his TK Max story.would Harry buy a sofa of all things?
Nah, this has been coming long before The Whore column. It was meant to end in 2018 but Amazon gave them a bumper pay deal to continue.First they take over Netflix now this! fuck you meghan! I liked watching it for James may!