Why are these companies pandering to these nobodies? Why should Harry and Meghan influence who we watch on television ? What hold does this pair have on the media channels ? I imagine that Jeremy Clarkson would be bringing in viewers long after this fifteen minutes that the gruesomes would. Another knee jerk reaction that they may regret. It sets a precedent that other deluded celebrities who think they rule the world will use. Clarkson won’t care, he has said so himself. He has plenty of money to keep him going.First they take over Netflix now this! fuck you meghan! I liked watching it for James may!
Diana would never have been able to wean herself from playing with the press and would have been totally destroyed by social media. Since the time she died look at where the tech for smartphones is her bad behavior would have come out and destroyed her I was such an innocent victim cardI agree. I think if Diana was alive during this generation, she would have been more scrutinised.
People's opinion of her was based on what was watched on TV or written in the tabloids.
These days, we have social media, discussion forums and You Tube. We have body language experts, psychologists etc at our fingertips willing to scrutinise behaviour. We can discuss, anonymously, her traits (using our own experiences).
Don't get me wrong, I liked Diana. But she played the game as much as Charles and ultimately, they were both as bad as each other during that marriage.
OMG! The policy of Appeasement! That didn’t get them too far back then. Find Winston Churchill quickly! Fight to the death of you Harry, you ungrateful little ponce! No giving in to terrorists!
She was already on her way. She was being scrutinized over the company she was keeping. The pedestal was getting wobbly.Diana would never have been able to wean herself from playing with the press and would have been totally destroyed by social media. Since the time she died look at where the tech for smartphones is her bad behavior would have come out and destroyed her I was such an innocent victim card
Don’t forget the people who were invited probably wanted to see the guest list to make sure the Harkles weren’t invited before they accepted the inviteI think the PR would only be one side of it. Think of all the accommodations, like over the top security, nutty demands like a giant trailer filled with teal bowling balls, Meghan stealing everyone else's gift bags, Harry running up to anyone who will listen begging for jobs for Meghan, BAFTA having to come up with some reason to put those two on stage because they wouldn't come otherwise-- and getting markled afterward just makes it so much less work NOT to invite them.
Absolutely, she would have had a massive downturn if she'd lived. As it is she's immortalised when she was very beautiful, never had to go through scrutiny about ageing.She was already on her way. She was being scrutinized over the company she was keeping. The pedestal was getting wobbly.
Yes, she was a bad mother for a wide variety of reasons, some of them:Pondering mummy issues...
I was having some thoughts as to whether Diana was actually a bad mother? What makes a bad mother? Is love enough? We know she wasn't that intelligent herself, wasn't very strict with boundaries, used a young William as a confidante and, towards the end, introduced the boys to a number of "uncles". I'm not suggesting her mental health had anything to do with it. The question that occured to me was, whilst she may have thought she was doing her best, were her mothering skills low? I do realise Charles had a part to play, but I guess I'm wondering if your views on Diana's competence as a mother have changed in light of the way Harry has gone off the rails in the very public way he has done.
And IF you think Diana was not a good mother role model for her children, is she to blame for that (i.e. could she have improved her skills to become a better mother if she wanted to) or do you think that was beyond her conscious control?
*Edited to add: I'm not sure where I sit on these questions, so I'm keen to know what others think. It's where my morning brain took me and I don't mean to cause any offence.
Could be the shrooms just sayinYep. It’s easily to mythologise someone who is dead, has been dead for years, and who you never really knew. He doesn’t seem to love her as a mother - rather, deifies her as a god. Diana, goddess of the hunt… hunted.
Really weird, as you say.
Exactly. My grandson is already earmarking furniture in my house that he plans to take with him.I can't keep up with these threads but wanted to share this. In the 80s Alan Clarke dismissed Michael Heseltine as "the type of man who buys his own furniture", the implication being that those of breeding inherited theirs. That is what struck me as completely preposterous, why would Harry buy a sofa of all things? There must be a few hundred around the place! How many castles, palaces and big houses are owned by members of the Royal family and Crown estates. Not to mention Viscount Linsey who ran a bespoke, handmade furniture company. Just seems odd - not to mention second hand high street!?!
First they take over Netflix now this! fuck you meghan! I liked watching it for James may!
The thing is he is not going to lose his audience because of this column. They won’t give a flying fuck. So another channel will pick him up because he comes with a guaranteed audience.he'll be on talk tv soon enough.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?