I don't know why but this is hilarious. Thank you for bringing this here!!
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Where did this ‘They’re at the Fosters’ nonsense come from? Because the only people who think they are still tight with the Fosters are Sugars.
Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
www.mirror.co.uk
Ooof! It was written to Harold only.
Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Prince Harry and Megahn Markle have shared a response to Jeremy Clarkson's latest statement, where he claimed he had emailed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to apologise for his column
Ooof! It was written to Harold only.
Wiki says it was actually professionally redecorated for William and Catherine.
So furniture aside, if it was a shabby mess when he showed Smeg around that presumably because he’d spent 3 years trashing it!
And certainly antiques don’t have to be valuable. My parents and my sister and I have houses full of old wooden furniture that came from grandparents going back three generations. It’s not worth anything but it’s nice to have the memories of people attached to it all and we can’t bear to just get rid of it. BP and KP must be swimming in all that low value level of furnishings (as well as the priceless) so it’s definitely odd if he wasn’t trusted with any of it.
Anyway we know he’s slovenly, uncaring about things and stingy. He was also obviously so used to people running around after him that it didn’t occur to him to actually tidy or clean or paint or improve his surroundings himself!
I bet this ‘so skint we had to buy a second-hand sofa’ is their lie-convincer for the black and white garden furniture being shipped over from Smegs (and captured in the fake Platty Joobs Lidl bday pics)
They want total control.Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Prince Harry and Megahn Markle have shared a response to Jeremy Clarkson's latest statement, where he claimed he had emailed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to apologise for his column
Ooof! It was written to Harold only.
Can't wait to see what piers has to say on this at 8pm
Even after JC apologised twice, they can't stop preaching
Jeremy Clarkson: Harry and Meghan accuse TV presenter of spreading 'hate rhetoric' as they dismiss latest apology over Sun column
Clarkson said he would usually get somebody to check his Sun articles, but instead wrote the piece in a rush without showing it to anyone. The Sussexes have rejected that explanation and claim he has a track record of hateful articles.
So it shows that even if you apologize, it doesn't work. And if you give them toenail they demand whole village.Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Prince Harry and Megahn Markle have shared a response to Jeremy Clarkson's latest statement, where he claimed he had emailed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to apologise for his column
Ooof! It was written to Harold only.
No negotiation with Cunts.
Book mention of Oprah …think it was @ResidentMerkin asked …H is asked why he did Oprah by Tiggy and others ..he says he fails to see why ‘ his family briefing the press’ is any different to him talking about family on Oprah . The only difference is that M & him had chosen an interviewer who is “above reproach “.
Good tweet from Piers
Ooof, here's an example of how they deal with an apology. More public shaming and grandstanding. They use everything they can get their hands on to either be a victim or to abuse others. Who would ever communicate with them moving forward? They spin everything as an insult, woe is me and they turn around and use it for profit, publicity, and abuse.Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Prince Harry and Megahn Markle have shared a response to Jeremy Clarkson's latest statement, where he claimed he had emailed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to apologise for his column
Ooof! It was written to Harold only.
James May had a crash into a wall on the program and one of his friends on another motor podcast (they are all journalist buddies) said he was still not right.
I also read elsewhere that Clarksons farm has done more to help people understand the difficulties of modern farming than decades of countryfile. He may shift it elsewhere but Amazon are not that fussed by his headlines. It will have died down. I could see him lose Millionaire over it as ITV.
Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Harry & Meghan issue response to Jeremy Clarkson apology over vile rant
Prince Harry and Megahn Markle have shared a response to Jeremy Clarkson's latest statement, where he claimed he had emailed the Duke and Duchess of Sussex to apologise for his column
Ooof! It was written to Harold only.
This bit.
After some of the contents of Hazza's memoir, that's a bit 'Pot Meets Kettle', isn't it?
And this is also exactly why the RF don't need to respond verbally. It won't be enough. It never will.
The Harkles are utterly graceless.
Piers will be addressing this now on Talk tv Can't wait.
Clarkson won't give a duck 
I agree people have just been twisting the amazon thing, but even if they did drop him they have had a series of very expensive flops from their original series' so they'd be foolish to stop a successful one but it wouldnt be susprising. I haven't read many of his articles, I'm intrigued at H&Ms claim he spreads dangerous conspiracy theories- does he? Or is it Harry's weed addled brain sending out the dog whistle. I agree no point him apologising, just as there will be no point Charles trying to either (still not sure what they want an apology for mind- answers on a postcard).
I will cancel my Prime membership if they ditch Clarksons Farm!
So far Bower (relevant) and me (irrelevant) are endlessly entertained by the ''spin.''
It will be a loooong 5 months (almost) until we get the joy of seeing our much beloved Harkles.
www.dailymail.co.uk
''Tom Bower, who wrote an unauthorised biography of the Duchess of Sussex, suggested it would be naive for King Charles and Prince William to seek a 'peace summit' with the Sussexes and urged them to issue a statement rebutting the couple's claims instead. ''
Tom comparably mild for someone that obviously had to insert a few errors in his book, to get away with it via ''it's not that accurate '' to actually publish the book and avoid lawsuits .
Of course Bower understands the ''game'' and doesn't do apologism , so it will be glorious .
''The RF is playing the long game''-most ''journalists '' don't even know what it is.
''The Harkles will have the backseat ''-of course, they don't want the front seat, they want the location of the seat, and the ultimate seat.
''William will solve it.''-Yeah.
''It's ''strategy '' -Course
''They would be damned if they do, damned if they don't .''-Nope, if a clear cut is done, vs ostriching untill 2 days before the Coronation , but that's the ''strategy'' to actually enable their presence .
Harry escaped the zoo, and started a circus with the zoo animals, I'm in awe by his propensity for risk taking , it was always extreme, now he just has a mission .
It will be a loooong 5 months (almost) until we get the joy of seeing our much beloved Harkles.
Charles 'should abandon ''peace summit'' with Harry and Meghan'
Tom Bower, who wrote an unauthorised biography of the Duchess of Sussex, suggested it would be naive for King Charles to seek a 'peace summit' with the Sussexes.
''Tom Bower, who wrote an unauthorised biography of the Duchess of Sussex, suggested it would be naive for King Charles and Prince William to seek a 'peace summit' with the Sussexes and urged them to issue a statement rebutting the couple's claims instead. ''
Tom comparably mild for someone that obviously had to insert a few errors in his book, to get away with it via ''it's not that accurate '' to actually publish the book and avoid lawsuits .
Of course Bower understands the ''game'' and doesn't do apologism , so it will be glorious .
''The RF is playing the long game''-most ''journalists '' don't even know what it is.
''The Harkles will have the backseat ''-of course, they don't want the front seat, they want the location of the seat, and the ultimate seat.
''William will solve it.''-Yeah.
''It's ''strategy '' -Course
''They would be damned if they do, damned if they don't .''-Nope, if a clear cut is done, vs ostriching untill 2 days before the Coronation , but that's the ''strategy'' to actually enable their presence .
Harry escaped the zoo, and started a circus with the zoo animals, I'm in awe by his propensity for risk taking , it was always extreme, now he just has a mission .
I put Diana in Regency period, I think she was the type and that she was brought up that way: have "high" social life, no carrier, no higher education, and finally excellent marriage.
She was infantile when she married Chuck. I wouldn't be surprised if she didn't think about "heir and spare" - she did her duty, so now she could play the field.
tit, I'm agreeing with Pierce thanks to cunts.
- Status