Keep giving them enough rope, they are hanging themselvesNile Gardiner, a foreign policy analyst and former aide to Margaret Thatcher, predicted that the book would further damage the pair’s relationship.
Mr Gardiner wrote on Twitter: “Prince Harry’s memoir is set to be a nasty hatchet job attack on his own brother.”
Duke of Sussex’s memoir contains ‘minute details’ on fight with Prince of Wales
Source familiar with the manuscript says Spare is ‘tough on William in particular and even Kate gets a bit of a broadside’www.telegraph.co.uk
Spare has already spent weeks near the top of the Amazon books sales charts based on advance orders, with the title at No. 5 in the UK listings on Sunday.
The couple signed a $20 million, four-book deal with Penguin Random House in 2021 and there has recently been unsubstantiated speculation that a memoir by Meghan might form part of the publication series.
The publication of Spare is being accompanied by two major television interviews of the Prince by ITV’s Tom Bradby and CBS’s Anderson Cooper to be broadcast in the coming days.
Prince Harry is also expected to give at least one newspaper interview to accompany the launch, with The New York Times – in which Meghan wrote about her miscarriage in 2020 – a possible outlet.
But in an indication that the six-part Netflix series has backfired on the couple, a poll last week found support draining away from them.
The YouGov poll found almost half of the public think the Duke should be stripped of his royal title, with 44 per cent saying they were more sympathetic towards Prince William and the Princess of Wales, compared with just 17 per cent for Prince Harry and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex.
Penguin Random House did not respond to requests for comment. ITV would not comment on the content of the Bradby interview.
A spokesman for the Sussexes did not respond to requests for comment on the content of Prince Harry’s book.
Telegraph article:W and H will never reconcile
Harry and William 'will NEVER reconcile after his book', insider says # via https://android.com
So when you’ve been voted the most overexposed and annoying celeb , the last thing you want is a book coming out , with yet more moaning !!! Or more moany interviews…..
This poem is amazing, reminds me of Coleridge - Kubla Khan and suchlike, the poet has such a wonderful declamatory voice,& intriguing accent I can’t place it. It’s the sort of poem to learn by heart. and like a spell against the Re-Fib ulatorsThis is a great poem about the reeks,very dark,very Game of Thrones...
Link may not work,it's called the liars by Joseph Charles Mackenzie on youtube
Firstly, thank you for sharing your story @ResidentMerkin. It must have been a truly frightening and prolonged period of your life, I can’t imagine the impact it’s had on your and your son.a couple things 1) the last court case was soo egregious and he was litigant in Person to save costs, that the judge listened to nex claims and demands and judge made it clear that he didn't believe his claims and would hold him to a veeeery high standard of evidence etc. He then announced that he would deputize himself (which he did right then and there, in the court room) to the High Court because he himself wanted to see it play out and make the judgment. The asshole visibly panicked and then the judge added that if nex did not meet the judge's standard of proof etc, he would rule against the nex and make him pay not just all my legal expense but even consider damages, as he was one case away from being deemed "vexatious litigant". NEx pooped himself and wiithdrew the application. 2) I was the greyest of greyrocks. I had cut off all means of contact and communication so he took me to court to force me to communicate with him (yeah). I had an IDVA (Independent Domestic Abuse Advocate) read the emails as they would cause me major panic attacks. the IDVA and I would agree if a response was necessary and what iit should be but she kept an eye on if it was swaying into abuse or threat territory and would add that to the very long report that the police had on him. It was interesting as he was a suspect in a viiolent assault that took place in our part of London on a lady who looked like me. They never managed to prove it (or catch the perp) but he was prime suspect not just because of the physical similarites but the behaviour specialists thought the record they had on him suggested psychopathy. He still doesn't know about his record as it is protected under Domestic Abuse protocol. 3) I lost my job and so he knew he coould no longer try to come after me for maintenance/other money and 4) our child that was sadly the plaform for his years of attacks turned 18 and that was it. No more grounds for anything. He timed out. It was insidious and tbh the legal system is wildly abused like this very very often. It is an actual tactic that Father4Justice train their members on. I've seen it. It is awful.
ETA - in April 2021, I believe, a law regarding this sort of abuse was passed to help stop women (who are 90% of the time the targets/victims). It is deemed Post-separation Abuse and was added to the Domestic Abuse Act, I think (am not a lawyer) but iit is still early days and judges are not trauma informed and not yet properly trained regarding this new law. Although Charlotte Proudman is a loud defeneder of Smegs and believes the Sugar Campaign that poor Smegs is a victim, Proudman was also instrumental in the drafting and passing of this law.
There are dedicated support groups for victims of this kind of abuse.
As in this case the targets are his father AND his brother, there is no real expiration point. Slag and her handbag could very well do this for I firmly believe that her main gripe is that she wasn't allowed to barge to the front of the queue and grab the top table and be appointed Queen, like she did and does with restaurants. I firmly believe the "one plane crash away from the throne" story and because TQ didn't abdicate and usher her ahead of Chuck and Wills to become Queen (as absurd as that it is to even imagine - but she is absurd), she is seeking her revenge and the demise of the monarchy. She wanted them to modernise the monarchy to change the rules so that she wouldn't have to bow to literally anyone and that the new rules would put her on the throne and have everyone bowing to her.
My personal favourite of 2022 was when H with zero self awareness , announced to US tv ,
Our saviour the candle! Give it a knighthood! Services to protecting us from Markles face!
Cunty Asides sounds like a village in the West CountryHonestly, there is nothing. Even mega Hollywood feuds like Bette Davis/Joan Crawford weren’t all consuming like this, most of the time they just bubbled away in the background with a few cunty asides here and there. But they had talent and class, unlike the Narkles, who are just frankly deranged.
And if the Asparagus isn’t 100% accurate, it still tastes great!But, I have just seen you in the paddling pool with Otter on Masked Singer @Scotch Mist - seems you are having a great NY
On the bookie wookie - the ‘asparagus lady‘, who uses them to predict the next year, said that PoW and Hazzno will not reconcile this coming year - which could make the ‘reports’ Hazzno is going after the Wales’s hold a little more credibility (if you believe that asparagus can tell the future)
She Is EverywhereWhat fresh hell is this?! Just logged into Netflix and this ad for their new thing started playing without me even prompting or wanting it?! Surely that’s against the law it’s only the first day of 2023!!!! I need a bunker, and fast!
Netflix desperation!What fresh hell is this?! Just logged into Netflix and this ad for their new thing started playing without me even prompting or wanting it?! Surely that’s against the law it’s only the first day of 2023!!!! I need a bunker, and fast!
What's the time stamp? Also what's the fake thoughtful pic all about?Holy balls!!! I just noticed something and someone else is gonna have to corroborate but…in The Royal Grift video I just posted here, there’s a black and white pic of Smegs looking pensive w/her laptop on her knees and the pic was used in the article slamming her for her discussion w/G Steinham on Roe v Wade being overturned. The article was titled “Duchess Meghan Markle slammed for “fake thoughtful pic” in Vogue discussing Roe v Wade.” Anyway. I noticed it looks like she is wearing the same pants and top she was in the pic of her holding Lili at her “birthday party” supposedly held at Frogmore. Not sure why it caught my eye but it did…both of those pics were black and white, so I’m wondering what’s up?
Thanks, @JAR21 I see now the shirts (jumpers) are different. The pants look the same, though! Appreciate you going back to look! You’re swell, Lady!What's the time stamp? Also what's the fake thoughtful pic all about?
I assume this is the photo you're referring to?
Screenshot 2022-06-29 at 16.19.00.png
MM pretending to be an activist re Roe vs Wade, June 2022tattle.life
Looks like a different jumper:
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?