Can anyone who has managed to read Lady Colin's book please tell me what she said about Archie's birth and the possibility of the moon bump? Did she mention it or skirt around it?
I think the only way smeggy will do that interview is if she has pre warning of the questions so she can rehearse her responses and do lots of test videos at home of her own reactions so she can get it perfected ......latest Murky Meg video
Hmmm. And she certainly made sure she “fit in” with other white groups later in life by lightening her skin, narrowing her nose, never dating black men, straightening her hair and identifying as caucasian on her CV. Not to mention the two white husbands, mostly white friends and a complete absence of any kind of work on behalf of the black community.And looking at the photo's she seems to fit in fine. All smiling, just one of the girls...no sign of any 'issues' there and I don't believe she's ever mentioned any.
I thought I was going nuts. I'm not up to scratch on American speak but I always assumed the grades started from their first school year (being grade 1 and aged about 5) so 8th grade would be 13/14-ish. I was scratching my head wondering why she was word-salading at them about voting when they're at an age where all they think about is boys, clothes, music and more boys. And sex. Voting? not on their radar. Silly twunt.Eighth graders are 14 years old. It was a middle school graduation
She was completely inappropriate, and telling them to use their vote; what in 2024?
Stupid Bitch
word-salading...I thought I was going nuts. I'm not up to scratch on American speak but I always assumed the grades started from their first school year (being grade 1 and aged about 5) so 8th grade would be 13/14-ish. I was scratching my head wondering why she was word-salading at them about voting when they're at an age where all they think about is boys, clothes, music and more boys. And sex. Voting? not on their radar. Silly twunt.
She's hardly done the legwork, that was left to poor Thomas Markle to get her through college and life etc, you know he's the guy who happens to be her father, who she shafted along with many others ?Push comes to shove I am on team Meg. Meg has done the legwork, nothing has been given to her on a plate. A bit of a troubled background, vaguely attractive. She's grifted her way into the upper echelons of society; celebrity society anyway. Fair play. She made a mistake, she broke-off more than she could chew. She's out of her depth. A part of me feels sorry for me. But that's me, the humanitarian; wanting to look-after a lost soul.
https://giphy.com/6vm8u786n3MBO
As for Harry. Sorry, but the mask has slipped. Even the housewives who read the Sunday Mail have washed their hands of him now. To think we all gave him a free-pass for wearing a Nazi-Uniform. Those were the days. The man is a cretin and he has blown away any sympathy we had for him regarding his mother. We as the British public gave him an long rope to hang himself and he still found the noose. I fear for the boy, I really do.
And the royal family should squeeze out some perfectly formed Shiite from a big height and bury her with itOprah only needs to ask one question and it's going to involve 'Royal Family' and 'racist' in the same sentence.
And then Meghan won't answer but will squeeze out one perfectly formed tear.
Absolutely Well Said....The worst thing that ever happened to Markle was getting everything she wanted.
Narcissists are ill-equipped for mega-fame, even though that’s what they strive for. They crave the kind of uncritical adoration that simply doesn’t exist in real life. Even Diana wasn’t universally beloved until she died. People forget this, I think.
Narcissism isn’t really self-love - it’s a self-hatred that’s too deep rooted and painful to confront. To cope, they construct an idealised identity for themselves to present the world with, and it will always fracture because it’s not real.
She tells us at length that she’s a “feminist”, “humanitarian”, “animal lover” etc...and that she’s been campaigning & working for these causes since she was young. Except that’s not true - it’s a complete lie.
If you add up her “charity work” it amounts to about two weeks worth - not much out of 36 years. And the two speeches she made focused on herself & her own experiences. For someone so keen on female empowerment she seems oddly reluctant to so much as mention any other female. It’s all her, her, her.
I mean - the woman went to one of the most impoverished nations on Earth for less than a week. When she came back she boasted about how she lived her life with “one foot on red carpets & the other in refugee camps”. ONE refugee camp for less that ONE week, and this is how she characterises it? And did she actually talk about Rwanda, who she met there, what the issues were and how people could help? Nope. She talked about HERSELF, and how much it all meant to HER -how she asked her mother why she felt this need to help people so much and St. Doria replied “You were born that way, honey”. Yes, she actually said this - I haven’t exaggerated.
You have to be a prize cunt to go and visit children living with violence and grinding poverty, then come home only wanting to talk about yourself.
There is something deeply wrong with Meghan Markle. I don’t admire her “grifting” - she hasn’t worked hard (except at self-promotion), she‘s just lied. Far from being a victim of racism, she’s been protected by it. Kate, Fergie, Camilla, Sophie & Diana would never, ever, ever have been able to get away with such obvious self-aggrandisement. But for Meghan, people have given her the benefit of the doubt because “isn’t it wonderful to have diversity in the royal family?” Sure it is. But having an angry, entitled, lying, showboating, botoxed old cow hasn’t been remotely wonderful.
Don’t worry about Oprah. She’s an extraordinarily intelligent and shrewd woman who has almost certainly already seen straight through Markle. What can be given can be taken away - and a woman capable of disrespecting the Queen will have no qualms whatsoever about doing the same to Oprah.
If she accuses the royal family of being racist towards her there really is no way back. So she's in a difficult position. If she insinuates that they were racist there will be a huge outcry (on both sides). Those who believe her will bay for blood and those that don't will be disgusted about her tearing into her husband's family who have spent huge amounts of money on her.Oprah only needs to ask one question and it's going to involve 'Royal Family' and 'racist' in the same sentence.
And then Meghan won't answer but will squeeze out one perfectly formed tear.
I don't know who Wayne Dupree is but he's bang on about Meghan and Harry. Neither of them really have a clue what life is like for people who really are oppressed in society.
There’s a whole chapter on it.Can anyone who has managed to read Lady Colin's book please tell me what she said about Archie's birth and the possibility of the moon bump? Did she mention it or skirt around it?
she's not been that quietAnd still Samantha Markle is keeping amazingly quiet
wonder why?
Its worrying how smoothly she said the story and described everything to such detail and now it turns out the whole riot and tree burned story was a lie.she's not been that quiet
Hasn’t the largest number of Rona victims belonged to BAME groups? Or did I imagine reading that somewhere?So just had an interesting cul de sac moment on Facebook...I said that the protesters were hypocrites for protesting in large groups for BLM,then if they caught Rona they would expect the NHS to help them after needlessly bringing it on themselves,so someone said I'm a hypocrite and how can I say I care when I didn't complain weeks ago when lots of ppl were tanning.oh and that if covid didn't kill us,rascism would.im not educating pork and telling her there's only one s in racism
I'm just hoping that there are alot more hypocrites out there who thought the same as me.was I right or wrong??you can be honest
Sorry for the rant...
H+m are still what Freda says...
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?