You don’t need status to hire veteran RPOs and unless they have clearances held by a large contractor (v rare for ex RPOs) then they lose their clearances.I mentioned this in previous thread about ''Police security for individuals is not for sale.'' and again this :'' think they were ex police,'' about the muddling of waters.
Harry technically doesn't have the right to hire veteran RPO's now, because of their security clearance levels being identical to active ones.
Technically he is fighting for status which would enable him to hire veteran RPO's that are now ''private contractors,'' or get back his full status.
That's the ''Intelligence'' element I'm harping on about.
Their clearance levels grants them access to ''Intelligence .''
I you want I can source examples, trying to avoid it.
But even with these clearances they don’t have rhe same access as current serving RPOs.
The reality is no6 wants to get full time security in thr UK and not pay for it. He knows he can’t pay for it so is putting pressure on getting it for free.
It’s like (kind of
![Rolling on the floor laughing :rofl: 🤣](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f923.png)
![See-no-evil monkey :see_no_evil: 🙈](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f648.png)
i would then threaten to sue everyone as I want to pay (of Course I don’t want to pay) and that you’re all bastards for not letting me pay (for something I was never entitled to in the first place).
I mean; it’s not my best metaphor…granted…but the fact is they have no entitlement, they know it, the offer to pay Is pathetic and they know will never to fly.
They need to fail and pay and then they might finally get some just desserts….maybe.
Such tossers